EZEKIEL
and YHWH’s
Judgment
for the
Good News
PEOPLE
VOLUME XI
The Evil Amalekites
EZEKIEL and YHWH’s
Judgment for the
Good News People
Volume XI--The Evil Amalekites
by
an unworthy servant
And you shall know the truth,
and the truth will make you free.
(John 8:32)
Common Law Copyright, 2003 & 2005 CE, an unworthy servant, Calder, Idaho. The author claims his Right of exclusive ownership and control of this publication, the fruit of his labor, as a matter of Intellectual Property protected by the Laws of YHWH and as guaranteed by the US Constitution for the United States. Permission is granted to quote provided appropriate credit is cited together with the Publisher’s web site name and postal mailing address––WWW.AgeEnd.Com PO Box 473, Calder, ID 83808, USA.
Contents
Volume XI--The Evil Amalekites
CHAPTER PAGE
- Cover Page 1
- Title Page 2
- Contents 3
- Publisher’s Preface 5
Part GG--Total Amalekite Depravity
154 Amalek-Edomite Depravity I 6
155 Amalek-Edomite Depravity II 21
156 Amalek-Edomite Depravity III 36
157 The Amalekites Follow Balaam 49
158 Amalek-Edomite Path of Evil 58
159 Amalekite Methodology for Destruction 70
160 The US Change on Race 82
Part HH-Amalekite Criminals
161 Amalek-Edomites and Crime I 93
162 Amalek-Edomites and Crime II 104
163 Russian Amalekite Criminals I 110
164 Russian Amalekite Criminals II 122
Part II--More on the Amalekites
165 Esau Versus Yakov 137
166 Amalekites Versus Arab Hatred 148
167 Amalekite Hate Organizations 155
SHEERIT YISRAEL
PO Box 473
Calder, Idaho 83808, USA
Publisher’s Preface
Greetings! The following presentation is volume eleven of a 36-volume production of some 6,000 pages on “Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good News People,” all of which is on the Internet at the www.AgeEnd.com web site.
This overall effort provides an interpretation of the Good News message in the New Testament, its linkage to the book of Ezekiel, and an application of both to the age-end prophecies relating to certain nations and peoples now out in the world. In order for this single volume to be understood and comprehended, it is imperative that the study be read from its beginning--from page one of volume one.
Anyone trying to read this volume or the study’s 6,000 pages at any mid-point will end up in a state of confusion without having read and digested the preceding material. It is crucially important that this work be read in sequence from its beginning--otherwise, the reader will almost certainly end up missing the essence of the message!
The effort was originally set on a Macintosh computer with Microsoft Word 6.0.1. It was set in Helvetica, 12-point type (18 pt on chapter headings); single line spacings; and margins: left 1.2”, right 0.8”, top 0.7”, bottom 0.8” and footer 0.6” (for page numbers).
For further information on obtaining this study in 18 computer floppy disks (IBM-formatted, high density, 2HD, 1.44 MB, 3 1/2 inches); in a single CD-Rom; or in hard copies (when the Internet or a compatible computer is not available); please write the publisher at the above address and send a stamped, self-addressed, long (legal-size), return envelope.
With a CD-Rom or computer floppy disks, the study is readable on Macintosh (systems 5.0 and later) or IBM/compatible (with Microsoft Word-Windows) personal computers. May The Great CREATOR and SOVEREIGN OF THE UNIVERSE bless you as you study His word to learn His will and to obey Him. Shalom (peace) to you and yours!
an unworthy servant, Hanukkah 2003 CE
Chapter 154-- Amalek-Edomite Depravity I
The Liberal Religious Motions
In broaching the bad Ashkenazi Jews of European lineage (many of whom are Amalekite Khazars), it must be said that they have had a tendency for liberalization and the changing of basic Judaism. This process has created the modern Reform and Conservative movements within Judaism. The Reform motion is very liberal and much like many Christian Churches, which don’t believe in much of anything.
There is also a Reconstructionist movement among Jews in America which is prompting some analysts to define it as a fourth major branch in Judaism (Jan 25, 2002, “Forward,” p. 1). This new push seems to be developing among Reform Jews, and it is therefore likely a part of Reform Judaism at present (although it was founded in 1948 by Professor Mordecai Kaplan of a Conservative seminary).
If this motion succeeds, it will be even more liberal and depraved than the case with the Reform movement, because It leans in the direction of denying The ELOHIM and promoting feminism and homosexuality (even ordaining women and queers as “rabbis,” as also seems to be happening in the generic Reform definition, as will be discussed below and in future chapters).
Obviously, Reconstruction Judaism will appeal to the wretched Amalekites who will surely flock to it in numbers (since it is so evil and bad). This motion will be further mentioned below and in later chapters.
More on Reform Judaism
The above comments have addressed Reform Judaism and some of its shortcomings. Naturally, the Amalekites have flocked to this religious reference. Not only has the Reform motion largely abandoned any sense of obedience, but they have even chosen in 1999 to welcome homosexuals into open fellowship (Jun 7, 1999, “US News & World Report,” p. 56).
In March 2000, the North American “Reform Rabbis passed a resolution under which Reform rabbinate officially supports the decision of individual rabbis to officiate at Jewish same-sex (marriage) ceremonies, becoming the first major religious organization to sanction ceremonies for homosexual couples” (May 2000 “National Liberty Journal,” p. 9).
Possibly, the move of the above mentioned Reconstructionist movement has put some fear and concern in the Reform leadership to prompt them to also begin liberalizing in terms of queers and women. In that sense, maybe the Reconstructionist movement will end up being a part of Reform Judaism (rather than being a separate definition).
These moves are quite logical since so many Amalekites are both queers and Reform Jews (Amalekites are almost synonymous with Reform Jewry in the US--and while all are not queers, almost all approve of homosexuality).
Of course, at some point in time, the evil Reform Jews would openly approve of queer marriages and accept the fags, both as members and as “rabbis” (along with the women “rabbis” that they have been ordaining for years).
Amalekite Feminism
With the enormous rush to feminism in the Reform and Reconstructionist movements, it was only time before some of these feminist Amalekites would determine to prepare their own commentary of the Torah in order to reinterpret things in accordance with modern feminism.
The May 24, 2002, “Forward” (p. 15) had a report addressing this motion in a story on “Reform plans All-Woman Commentary on the Torah.” This article quoted several Reform women “rabbis” and Lori Lefkovitz, academic director of the Kolot: The Center for Jewish Women’s and Gender Studies at the Reconstructionist Rabbinical College in Philadelphia.
Lefkovitz welcomes the new commentary and adds that “What these new commentaries have shown us is that what women bring to the text is a different sensibility, a different set of experiences and different questions, even if they are not writing as women per se.”
Going on, Lori adds that the women “twist the lens of the material so that we notice different things, we see other emphases, we recover lost traditions and we hear voices that have been quieter.” Like Yeshayahu wrote, women will destroy the paths of righteousness when they exercise leadership over men (Isa 3:12).
Others
Like the Reform Jews, the above mentioned Conservative Jews also have a European basis, but are somewhat between the Reform and Orthodox.
Next, mention must be made of the major differences in attitudes and beliefs over the years between Ashkenazi (European) Jewry and Sephardi Jewry (as broached in previous chapters and to be further described below and in later chapters herein).
Another different group is the previously cited Karaites (which seem to have their roots entirely in old Babylon and thus in the land areas where Sephardi/Oriental Jews dominated). There is much evidence suggesting that the Karaites (who reject the Talmud) are an outgrowth of the old Essene movement (at least, the theology of the two groups seems to have much in common).
Today
The “Jerusalem Post” of June 28, 1997, had an article by Jonathan Rosenblum on “America’s do-it yourself Torah” which noted that in place of theology, “American Jews have an attitude; No one--not even God--can tell me what to do.” Since European Khazars dominate American Jewry, the above news report tells the story of the modern Amalek-Edomite feelings for Judaism and the Torah.
Conversely, let a person in today’s contemporary society say anything that can be construed as criticism about so-called Jews from a racial or ethnic perspective and the Amalek-Edomite Khazars, in particular, go completely crazy and lose their cool.
Many Amalekites (calling themselves Jews) are irrational and paranoid over any discussion about race or ethnicity (especially if it might link to them and their status). Their immediate response is to start hollering about discrimination, oppression, genocide, racism, anti-Semitism and the holocaust. Otherwise, it appears that many Oriental and Sephardic Jews are more responsible and sane on this theme.
Many so-called Christian Jews (as well as Moslems and Christians in general) are undoubtedly Edomites racially--because true Jews would be hard pressed to justify Christianity (as will be established in later chapters).
Thus, many of them follow the precedents established by the Marranos when the Catholic Church forced conversion to Christianity on them in the days of the Catholic Inquisition in Spain and Portugal (14th-17th centuries, CE).
In those days, the Protestant Reformation was getting ready to bloom and the Catholic authorities conceived the methodology of the Inquisition to keep so-called heretics and other religious non-conformists (like Jews) in line by torture and punishment, with eventual death by being burned alive at the stake.
Those Jews either converted or they were dead. Consequently, many faked conversion to Catholicism, but maintained their traditional beliefs. The Edomites appear to have followed this practice through the years in terms of their participation in Judaism, Christianity or whatever.
The Edomite Reichorn
Dave Barley, in the April 1998 “America’s Promise Newsletter” (p. 5), quotes an interesting publication entitled “La Ligue Feminine Anti-Communiste de Montreal,” published by Adrien Arcand in Ontario, Canada. This document allegedly had a section on “A Jewish Plan of World Domination.”
This plan was supposed to represent the contents of a lecture delivered by an obvious Amalek-Edomite named Reichorn in Prague in 1869 over the tomb of one Simeon ben Jehuda. Reichorn noted that “It is said that numbers of our brothers have been converted and baptized Christians... What does it matter?”
Going on, Reichorn charged that the “Baptized ones can be very useful to us; they can become our auxiliaries to march to new horizons, which are still unknown to us; for those converted ones still belong to us” with the same spirit and soul.
The point of Reichorn’s words is that it doesn’t matter what religious faith an Amalek-Edomite pretends to embrace. In all cases, the Amalekite remains a wicked, depraved, vile Edomite, spiritually and mentally. As will be established in later comments, a leopard cannot change his spots.
Edomites Pretend or Fake It
Thus, many Edomites publicly pretend to be good Jews or good Christians. And if so, they normally tend to identify with liberal, permissive Jewish and Christian faiths which really believe in little or nothing in terms of truth.
Therefore, they would probably more often identify themselves with the Reform and Reconstructionist Jewish movements or liberal Christian denominations, as discussed above and elsewhere herein.
Also, as commented upon earlier--historically, a portion of the ruling hierarchy in the Roman Catholic Church appears to have been Edomites. Of course, there is the obvious link that Catholicism has had with Sicilians and Southern Italians--evidently from the Edomite Zepho, discussed earlier on the murderers of the righteous. Generic Edomites have been the leaders in Rome.
Moreover, Pope Paul VI was reported to be a secret Amalekite (with the Italian name of Giovanni Battista Montini). Even today, there is talk that Jewish Cardinal Lustiger of France, another very likely Amalekite, will be the next Pope when John Paul II dies (Aug-Sep 1999 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 79). There is some speculation that he will take the name of Peter. But otherwise, a future pope may become Sixtus Six.
The Apr-Jun 2001 “Petah Tikvah” magazine (p. 6) noted that Pope Gregory VI in 1045 and Pope Anaclet II in 1130 were both Jews (correctly Amalekites, ed). Some of the Italians didn’t approve of a Jewish pope (with Anaclet II), so they appointed a counter-pope (Innocent II). Yet, it has to be significant that many of the Catholic rulers/leaders (who rejected Amalekite Jews) have been Edomites themselves.
Evil Amalekites Persecute Jews
Evil Amalek-Edomites within the Catholic Church have often been responsible for the historic persecution and hatred of Jews and Judaism. Evil Edomites (like Adolf Schicklgruber and Yuri Vladiminovich Andropov, who will be commented upon at some length in later chapters herein) have been active in Jewish persecutions in the recent 20th century. This may seem to be quite a paradox. But it represents reality.
For some strange reason, diabolical Amalek-Edomites have proven to be the greatest of enemies of the collective Jewish people in all of history. They have launched the most intensive persecutions of all and especially on religious Jews (like with Haman and Herod the Great, as allowed in the Prologue).
This Edomite hatred and persecution of religious (observant) Jews (who more likely would tend to be true racial Jews) is most significant, as will be shortly proven.
Otherwise, the Arabs have claimed for some time now that 30% of Protestant Bishops are Jewish (correctly Amalekites, because it is unfathomable that a true Jewish Israelite would identify with Christianity).
Assuredly, any number of Amalekites have supposedly converted to Christianity in order to use that definition to help them in being parasites to rip off the gullible, stupid goyim (as noted in the Prologue).
Why the Edomite Linkage
Why do these Amalek-Edomites link up with established Christendom or Jewry at all? Why not just be Satanists or Luciferians outright without the secrecy? The answer is for the obvious economic, political and social benefits which can accrue to an individual (particularly an Edomite) by identifying with publicly accepted religions.
It is quite certain that the depraved and wicked Edomites would prefer the liberal, permissive Christian Churches or Reform (or Reconstructionist) Judaism in the context of the Christian West.
But in those areas where Orthodox Judaism or more conservative Christian Churches prevail in popularity, it must be allowed that some Edomites will flock to these conservative faiths simply to reap any rewards to be had for membership in those groups.
Hence, Amalek-Edomites will gladly join the Ku Klux Klan, the Nazi party, the US Militia organizations, the Christian Identity movement, Orthodox Judaism or anything or everything else if they perceive it as a personal benefit with that affiliation. They really have no conscience or concern whatsoever with who or what they attach themselves to in order to accomplish their objectives.
Name Changes
Amalek-Edomites do the same thing when they change their Edomite names to more common and acceptable names in the host country where they live and draw their sustenance as parasites. Not only have they habitually changed their names when they arrived in the United States, but they have generally followed this practice wherever they have gone.
Thus, in America--Bernard Schwartz became Tony Curtis, Emmanuel Goldenberg became Edward G. Robinson, Leonard Rosenberg became Tony Randall, Marian Levee became Paulette Goddard, Joseph Levitch became Jerry Lewis, Shirley Schrift became Shelley Winters, Issur Danielovitch became Kirk Douglas, Asa Yoelson became Al Jolson and Joan Persky became Lauren Bacall.
The same phenomenon has occurred with the Amalekites going to the modern state of Israel. On arrival, they change their Eastern European, Khazar names to Hebrew names (i.e. in Israel, Lauren Bacall’s Persky cousin became Shimon Peres). In Austria, the Amalekite Schicklgruber adopted the good German name of Hitler and on and on.
Because of this Amalek-Edomite propensity to change their names in the host countries where they live (as parasites), they have often been able to fool much of the public when people fail to check upon them more closely.
This Amalekite name change phenomenon brings to this writer’s mind a situation in the Northern Mariana Islands a few years ago. There was a family on Rota Island named San Nicolas, as best as now remembered by this writer. One of the sons decided to move to Saipan Island (a much larger island with a much larger population) and establish himself.
On arriving on Saipan, this man checked around to determine which was the most prominent and successful family there. He learned that a family named Sablan was the most prominent and successful on Saipan. Accordingly, he changed his name to Sablan in an expectation that the name Sablan would better help him succeed on Saipan.
Possibly, this is one of the compelling reasons that many Amalekites change their names when they move to a new area to begin anew their work of deception and evil. Surely, some of them adopt local names of the more successful families so that they can use this linkage in their efforts of deception.
Thus, an Amalekite named Kohn from Eastern Europe moved to Massachusetts. On arrival he found Irish Catholics to be the main families running things there. So he changed his name to Kerry and became a Roman Catholic. US Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts is one of the descendants of this Amalekite family.
An article on the Internet mentioned some of the modern DNA work of trying to determine the validity of Jewish names as being associated with the historic Jewish priesthood--i.e., whether Jews named Cohen (meaning a priest) could be a priest, whether Jews named Levi could be Levites, etc.
One of the problems researchers found in analyzing Ashkenazi Jews of Khazar extraction was that back in the 8th century BCE some of the Khazars who converted to Judaism changed their Khazar names to Levi or one of its cognates in order to try to fool the Jews into thinking that they were Levites.
It is not clear how extensive this Khazar practice was or whether it also reached to adoption of the name Cohen. But it shows the early depravity of these Amalekite Khazars from the earliest days of their history of pretending to be Jews; when, in fact, they were evil Amalekite children of Satan. This Khazar propensity of changing their names must go far back in their history.
By the way, the Aug 9, 2002, “Forward” (p. 12) quoted Solomon Lozovsky, a former colleague of Lenin and Stalin, in the pre-Russian Revolution days (before 1917). Lozovsky (surely an Amalekite, but evidently a man of some wisdom) said that “Anyone who denies his background is a bastard.” Possibly, Lozovsky is right. And his words indict all Amalekites who choose to change their historic Amalekite names!
Amalekites Will Do Anything
In effect, the typical Amalek-Edomite seems to have no conscience, concern or integrity at all, in terms of what religion, or even what family name that he may be identified with publicly. He will use anything and everything which may seem to give him an advantage in terms of functioning as a parasite, drawing the life blood out of the host country where he lives.
Thus, the evil Karl Marx and Adam Weishaupt, Amalek-Edomites, were classic examples. Both were born Jews, but later converted to Christianity. However, both appeared to have always been supposed atheists and/or secret Satanists.
The previously cited Adolf Schicklgruber, another evident Amalek-Edomite, was born and raised a Catholic. However, in adulthood, he secretly was deeply involved in the occult and who knows what else.
The wicked Roosevelts were originally Dutch Jews--clearly Amalek-Edomites. In time, they became Christians (largely Episcopalian or Dutch Reformed). But certainly, the well known evolutionist Clinton (Roosevelt), Teddy, Eleanor and Franklin were all practical or visible atheists in their public image. Their histories suggest that they believed in nothing of value.
Alternatively, if one looks carefully at their political records, the evidence is substantial to suggest that virtually all of the Roosevelts were actually secret children of Satan, just like other Amalek-Edomites. Historically, they have been extremely evil and wicked and have brought much hurt on both the United States; and indeed, on the world at large.
More on Slick Clinton
Jewish writer Mona Charen focused upon the American Jewish problem, in an article on “The hollowed spirituality of U.S. Jews,” as appearing in the June 14-20, 1999, “Washington Times” (p. 32). She quoted a recent survey made by the American Jewish Committee.
The survey found that 80% of American Jews approved of Slick Clinton’s acquittal in the Senate over his sodomite debasement of the Jewess Monica Lewinsky, described in other chapters herein.
Some 60% even blamed the Republicans for Clinton’s sodomy scandal, as opposed to 36% who blamed Slick for the crisis. Otherwise, some 73% of American Jews opposed parental choice in educating their children.
The report said that only 15% of American Jews believed that religious observance was important to their identity while 98% contended that “remembrance of the Holocaust” was important to their identity. Some 62% believed that so-called “anti-Semitism” is a larger threat to their identity than other factors--to include inter-marriage with non-Jews.
Contrast these numbers with the fact that only 46% think that being a part of the Jewish people is important. Since Reform Judaism is the backbone (in numbers and influence) of American Jewry, the above findings are most interesting.
Though some will make the case that Reform Judaism (founded in the 19th century in Germany) has been a disaster for Jews, the truth is that it has found its primary acceptance among Amalekites; who, because of genetics, would apparently never be sincere religious Jews under any circumstances (since they are spiritually and physically children of Satan).
Amalekite Deceit
There is another fall-out of this Amalekite fanaticism over maintaining beliefs in the so-called “holocaust and anti-Semitism,” as a part of their racial-ethnic identities. Many Amalekites are so paranoid over these ideas and the need to constantly keep them alive that they will go to any extreme to continually push these issues to the front pages of the Amalekite controlled media.
As the May 10, 2002, “The Week” (p. 4) mentioned, anyone in America “who criticizes anything Israel does--is now called an anti-Semite or ‘self-hating Jew.’”
While “The Week” is correct on this assessment, this writer would like to add that anyone who criticizes any Jew on any matter is subject to the same complaint. Of course, a Jew who does this (toward fellow Jews) is called a self-hating Jew.
John O’Connor
In his video on the “Synagogue of Satan,” Catholic priest John O’Connor mentioned one of the interesting quirks about how this charge of anti-Semitism was successfully used by Ashkenazi Jews (correctly Amalekite Khazars) against the former Czars in old Russia.
Historically, these Khazars constitute a state within a state in whichever countries they have lived. In pre-1917 Russia, the Ashkenazi Jews were in this arrangement in Czarist Russia.
And around the start of the 20th century (perhaps just after the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” were discovered and made public in Russia), this state within a state had become an almost total Marxist revolutionary and anarchist entity out to destroy the Czar’s government.
Once the Czar tried to oppose them, the Ashkenazi Khazars responded by labeling the Czar and his government anti-Semitic. In Russia and around the world, the poor Czar was called an evil anti-Semite for daring to oppose the very people who were trying to destroy him and his government.
This seems to be the way the Amalekites work. If any goy comes along and criticizes them for anything, the immediate Amalekite response (from their money, media and educational powers) is to define the issue as involving anti-Semitism.
No person in the Christian West (not even a Jew) can criticize, oppose or denigrate the Amalekites for fear that he will be immediately branded an anti-Semite. And now, after working that term to death, the new Amalekite modus operandi is to call such people racists and White supremacists.
Amalekite Tricks
If the Amalekite Jew controlled media has no reason to be blaring about the holocaust or anti-Semitism, then many Amalekites will initiate action to cause an outburst from the media from time to time so that the gullible Christian Israelites (goyim) can come under more guilt and have more of their freedoms taken away from them.
One of the favorite tricks which the evil Amalekites use to constantly harass and intimidate stupid Christian Israelites is to set a fire at some synagogue or paint some ugly, inappropriate and ridiculous graffiti and messages on synagogue walls. Naturally, the media loves any alleged Christian attack on a synagogue. This gives them a huge, front page story to whine and complain about.
Of course, the controlled media would never suggest that some Amalekite could have or would have deliberately written the bad words on the synagogue or set the fire at the synagogue. Nazis, right-wing extremists and White supremacists would be immediately blamed and castigated.
Sometimes, efficient law enforcement people can accumulate proof that one of the Amalekites did the deed. In those cases, the Amalekite controlled media either down-plays the report (placing it in small print on a back page) or ignores it completely.
From the controlled media viewpoint, it is front page news that a White supremacist burned a synagogue. But there is no news if one of the synagogue’s own Amalekite members set the fire.
Whenever a story surfaces over an alleged right-wing attack on a synagogue, nine chances out of ten, the attack (fire, graffiti or whatever) can be laid at the doorsteps of an evil Amalekite member of the synagogue designed to keep the holocaust and anti-Semitism stories alive.
“Spotlight,” Revisited
“Spotlight” of Jan 17, 2000, had a story by James P. Tucker on “Real Truth Censored About ‘Hate’ Crimes,” which noted a case from Maryland of a few years ago. A Jewish family’s home in an upscale neighborhood was found spray painted with swastikas and hate messages.
The controlled media went wild for days and days with stories about this atrocity to generate sympathy and gifts from the guilt ridden goyim. Later, it developed that the Jews involved (obvious Amalekites) desecrated their own home and placed the blame on the stupid goyim.
Deceitful Amalekite merchants are notorious for burning down their buildings and stores (especially with inventory that won’t sell) to collect insurance. If they can blame the fire on the stupid goyim, it really helps the anti-Semitism case.
The “Spotlight” paper of Mar 13, 2000, had another article along the same line. This one, “Victim Responsible for Supposed Hate Crime,” by William Carmichael, was from Stamford, Connecticut where a supposed hate crime took place at a Jewish synagogue (Temple Beth El) in the summer of 1999 (just one week after the nut Buford Furrow shot up a synagogue in Los Angeles, CA, elsewhere discussed herein).
Per the story, a swastika emblazoned bucket full of medical waste material was left outside of the synagogue. Some of the waste was scattered on the synagogue’s lawn. Naturally, the controlled national media and Jewish leadership cried out about the great evils of this anti-Semitism and hate crime. Political leaders whined about needing to do something.
Well, in February 2000, a Jewish man named Alan Jay Lorenz of Weston, CT was arrested for the incident with a federal civil rights violation. He was charged with obstructing persons in the free exercise of their religious beliefs. Lorenz is also a suspect in another desecration at a Norwalk synagogue.
Amalekite Bombings?
At Passover, in 2002, a minivan blew up in Brooklyn, NY, seriously wounding the driver, the apparent Amalekite Israel Halberstam. Immediately, the controlled media said that it was an “anti-Semitic attack.” Now, authorities believe that the bomb belonged to Halberstam and that he was transporting it to some other place (Apr 22, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 2).
The remaining question is--what was the evil Amalekite doing with the bomb? Is it possible that Israel would use the bomb to blow up somebody or something which could be blamed on the Arabs or on alleged White supremacists/anti-Semites? Of course, it would be easy to murder some innocent people and blame the act on anti-Semites, Arabs or White supremacists.
On Aug 23, 2002, a news report said that one Robert Goldstein had been arrested in Tampa, Florida for possessing bombs and explosive devices. Allegedly, Goldstein planned on using his bombs to blow up Muslim mosques across America.
Surely, the very evident Amalekite Goldstein would blow up some mosques and stage the acts as coming from so-called right-wing, Christian extremists and White supremacists.
For sure, the controlled national media would have a field day with many slanted reports. And by all means, new legislation would roll out of Congress and the US president (whomever he is) would write a series of new executive orders to further impede upon the Constitutional rights of the average American citizen.
Blacks Too
Interestingly, Blacks have picked upon this favorite trick of deception by Amalekite bankers/masters.
Often, there will be a big story and hype about a fire or attack on a Negro Church--especially in the South. Later, when it develops that an African American set the fire or did the deed, it is no news. This media hypocrisy will be assessed in subsequent chapters herein.
It looks like the stupid, ignorant, Christian Israelites (goyim) would eventually see how this scam is successfully run against them, time and time again. But the stupid goyim never seem to catch on.
Let a Negro or Amalekite surreptitiously bomb, burn or damage his own religious meeting place and the Amalekite controlled media will give the right-wing condemnation and hate for days on end. Yet, when the truth finally comes out about the perpetuator, the story is lost forever. What is this--hypocrisy?
Incidentally, the fact that an Amalekite will damage or injure his own religious facility is enormous proof of the utter evil and wretchedness of these people. Like Slick Clinton, they have no conscience or integrity at all. Their whole lives are built on a sham, deceit and dishonesty. They are truly sons of Satan. No wonder that they go to any length to say the Kol Nidre prayer on Yom Kippur (as described previously).
The Start of Edomite Deception
It should not surprise anyone that the Amalek-Edomites would be such classic liars and frauds totally dedicated to deception--all the while that they pretend and fake reality in order to hide their true motives and goals. Actually, this lying and deceiving started with Esau, himself.
As outlined earlier, the Word reflects that Esau was a “cunning hunter” (Gen 25:27). The “Soncino Books of the Bible” (v. I, p. 142) interprets this remark as meaning that he was “a man understanding how to deceive” --literally how to ensnare his father with his mouth.
Some scholars note that the previously mentioned Oholibamah (Gen 36:2), one of Esau’s wives, was seemingly the exact same person as Judith, who reportedly married Esau (Gen 26:34). The “Soncino Books of the Bible” (v. I, p. 215) says that Esau changed her name to deceive Yitzhak into believing that she was not an idolatress.
Surely, the name change phenomenon, mentioned above in this chapter, as being common to Edomites, was to characterize Esau’s descendants for the next 3,900 years. Amalek-Edomites regularly change their names and public religions to deceive and fool people as to their true identity.
With this Esau lying precedent established in the Edomite lineage, it is only natural that Amalek-Edomites will change their names and supposed religions, however often they choose (if they think a change will benefit them), without a whimper or concern at all. They are very deceptive and dishonest people, genetically.
Despite their propensity for name changes and deception, as to their true identities, there are two curious little facts of identification which may have “possibly” survived over the years to amazingly link many, modern, American Jews specifically to the evil Amalekites.
Two Interesting Possibilities
Mark Thomas, Pennsylvania State Chaplain of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, alleges that the popular epithet “Kike,” so often applied to American Jews, is a contraction of the word Amalekite (“Religion and the Racist Right,” p. 131). Frankly, the origin of this word, so often applied to Jews by their enemies, seems unclear. But the possibilities of tying it to the Amalekites is enticing based simply on sound if for no other reason.
In his video on the “Synagogue of Satan,” Catholic priest John O’Connor of Pennsylvania says that the Ashkenazi Jews of Germany (who essentially have been and generally are Amalekites) supported Adolf Hitler in his rise to power. O’Connor notes that the word “nazi” comes from the word “Ashkenazi.”
Thus, is it possible that the Amalekites were the power and brains behind the early German Nazi movement? Are contemporary American Ashkenazi Jews actually Nazis?
More on the Khazars
The Edomite propensity to be evil and wicked, as broached above and in the prior chapters, wasn’t just a phenomenon of ancient ages, nor did it commence in more modern times. The historic Amalek-Edomite Khazars apparently have always been evil and wicked from their inception. Since Judaism is a fairly decent religion, one would think that the Khazars would improve on becoming Jews. But they haven’t.
Amalek-Edomite Khazars have often led the way in being very forward, pushy, demanding and vocal in modern liberalism, Socialism, Communism and humanism--with all of the adverse features which these motions entail (to be covered in future chapters).
As an example, the Spokane, WA City Council held a public meeting around Sep 1, 1998, to discuss extending to homosexual queers its city ordinances which granted minorities extra privileges. An alleged Amalek-Edomite named Schwartz came to the meeting from the East to promote his concept of special rights for faggots.
During the meeting, a man in the audience, quietly sitting and minding his own business in the public meeting, began sketching some of the participants on a piece of paper. Somehow Schwartz found out (how? Did he go and look over the sketcher’s shoulders to see what was being sketched?).
Schwartz publicly interrupted the meeting and demanded that the man be thrown out and/or arrested for drawing alleged anti-Semitic material. The Council refused to evict the man. Schwartz continued his apparent pushy, forward, vocal disruption of the meeting and apparently left it in a fit of rage and anger. One person supposedly touched him briefly on his way out.
Thereupon, the vocal and disruptive Schwartz effectively declared a war of sorts against the city of Spokane for not kicking the innocent artist out the door or having him arrested. Schwartz claimed that he was starting legal action to get gobs of money from Spokane over the incident. This is the type of action which evil Amalek-Edomites gladly pursue.
They are very big mouthed, pushy, forward, demanding, hateful, arrogant and disruptive to law, order, decency, honesty and morality. If anyone tries to oppose their evil and wretchedness, they immediately cry out anti-Semitism. The Amalek-Edomite controlled press picks up on things like this and society never hears the end of it.
The “Forward”
This Amalekite madness in rushing to lawsuits and court actions was demonstrated in several very intriguing lawsuits filed by apparent Amalekites in 2002, per the various issues of the “Forward” newspaper in 2002.
The first story (Apr 19, 2002, “Forward,” p. 3), on “Jewish Reporter Says Marriage to Arab Cost Her Job,” by Nacha Cattan, said that a Jewess named Livi Regenbaum filed a discrimination lawsuit against the “Kansas City Jewish Chronicle” because the paper allegedly fired her because of the ethnicity of her husband. Regenbaum was married to a Palestinian Arab. She was a reporter for the Chronicle until she was fired.
A spokesperson for the paper said that the Jewess was fired because of unspecified “job performance issues.”
The second story (ibid, p. 14) was by Marc Perelman on “Jewish Lawyer To Sue Israel for ‘Terrorism.’” This report concerns the actions of 48-year old Stanley Cohen of New York City who will sue the state of Israel for its “terrorist” actions in the West Bank of Palestine.
The unique thing about both of these lawsuits is that they involve Jews suing other prominent Jewish groups or operations. Normally, most lawsuit prone Amalekite Jews go out of their way to sue the goyim whom they look down upon as stupid cattle. It certainly is a unique situation that a Jew would dare sue the state of Israel.
Seemingly, one of the most pathetic illustrations of Amalekite madness for lawsuits and legal terror surfaced in a story by Jeff Zell in the Aug 9, 2002, “Forward” (p. 1) which noted that the “Jews, Gays Suing Methodist Home for Hiring Bias.” This report demonstrated both the Amalekite propensity for lawsuits and sexual perversion.
Actually, these two forces (the queers and the Amalekites) are not necessarily different because much of the homosexual movement is headed and promoted by the depraved Amalekites (as will be proven in this and succeeding chapters).
The story by Zell said that there were seven plaintiffs (including one faggot Jewish “rabbi”) in the suit against the Decatur, GA United Methodist Children’s Home because the Home refuses to hire Jews, fires qualified workers for being gay, and requires counselors to condemn homosexuality. The plaintiffs say that these acts constitute discrimination.
The Amalekites are extremely pushy and demanding in their pursuit of life. They will quickly sue anybody or anything if they see it to their advantage. Apparently, this lawsuit proneness even extends against fellow Jews.
More Palestinian Support
The earlier April 12, 2002, “Forward” (p. 6) had another story by Nacha Cattan on “Leftist Jews Gaining Strength in Support of Palestinians” which also told about the efforts of some leftist Jews in the United States in trying to side with the Palestinians in their conflict with the state of Israel. Actually, this story and the above cited lawsuits are real flukes because almost all Jews automatically support Israel first and most.
Anyway, Bluma Goldstein, a retired professor from the University of California at Berkeley, and one of the leaders of the American pro-Palestinian movement, signed an ad in the “New York Times” in support of the Palestinians.
In an interview with the “Forward,” Goldstein said that “If a Jew criticizes Israel we’re self hating Jews and if you’re a non-Jew you’re antisemitic.” This name calling reaction seems normal for Amalekite Jews, as was pointed out above and in the preceding chapters.
Of course, Ms Goldstein is correct, although she did not go far enough. Any non-Jew criticizing Israel or even Jews in general is automatically called an anti-Semite. The Jews are always above criticism (evidently, except for the Ultra Orthodox, which the Amalekites passionately hate the most of all).
Incidentally, since the Nazi era and WWII, the use of the word “anti-Semite” has been grossly overworked (by the controlled Amalekite Jew media).
Accordingly, many enlightened Amalekite Jews are beginning to use other catch phrases and words to describe anyone who criticizes a Jew. As noted earlier, the new approach is to call enemies of the Amalekite Jews--White supremacists or racists.
And More Palestinian Support
Incidentally, the May 6, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 4) had a story from New York that eleven Orthodox US “rabbis” had issued a statement on behalf of the Palestinian Arabs at a pro-Palestinian rally in Washington, DC on April 20, 2002. This group decried the Zionists for their efforts in establishing a Jewish state in Palestine and called upon the US to stop US aid to Israel.
Ovadyah, Revisited
Previous chapters herein focused upon the wonderful prophecies of the small book of Obadiah, which are entirely dedicated to the doom and eventual punishment of the evil Edomites. Verses 2-5 are particularly interesting because they convey an overall appreciation for the incredible depravity and wickedness of these people.
Some of the English translations of Obadiah are a little difficult to deal with in understanding. But an interpretation in the July 1999 “Destiny Editorial Letter” (entitled “Esau and Jacob in Prophecy”) was very revealing. It said:
“Comparatively small in number, small in honor, not merely despised, but ‘greatly despised;’ arrogant, ‘Who shall bring me down to the ground?;’ notoriously ambitious for money and power, exalting themselves ‘as an eagle;’ and rapacious beyond all measure or mercy.
“Even gleaners of grapes would leave a few for others. But the greed of these people is insatiable. They covet all for themselves. These are the marks of Esau-Edom.”
Manifestly, the Edomites, generally, and the Amalekites, particularly, are the most evil people of all time. Their utter depravity and gross wickedness will be further addressed in the succeeding chapters.
Chapter 155--Amalek-Edomite Depravity II
The Edomite Red
A former chapter discussed the linkage of the color red to the Edomites. For example, the famous Rothschild banking house got its start with a red sign or shield being placed over its building in early Frankfort, Germany (to identify its Amalek-Edomite occupant?).
The previously discussed Mystery Babylon the Great, the mother of harlots, and the beast she rides, are both scarlet colored (Rev 17:3-4). As Funk & Wagnalls’ “Standard Desk Dictionary” (p. 596) indicates--the scarlet color is “a brilliant red, inclining to orange. Scarlet is a favorite color in the Roman Catholic Church (Cardinals like to dress in scarlet red at their important functions).
Thus, the color red identifies both Satan and his Edomite servants. Of course, the flags of Turkey, Albania and various Communist countries have been or are red--the classic Edomite color. It must be pointed out that the color red has historically been associated with Communism and some of the leftist movements which are all very pushy, forward and demanding. Red is, of course, the classic color of Edom.
Naturally, the color red has come to signify and identify most or all of the leftist movements (even to include the pro-Palestinian motions). It may seem like a fluke that the Edomite red can be attached to a pro-Palestinian group, but it seems to be the real world out there as far as the Amalekites are concerned.
Edomite Perversion
Assuredly, sexual perversion is big in the red Communist, leftist and liberal motions, cited above and in prior chapters, in the context of the Edomites. Thus, numbers of Amalek-Edomites are queers, as well as being some of the biggest spokesmen and advocates of perversion. There are also reasons to believe that sexual perversion is still fairly common in some Edomite lands--like Turkey.
There is some evidence that the famous Lawrence of Arabia was homosexually raped by a Turkish general when he was captured for a spell. With his literal choice of almost any of the most attractive and appealing women in the area, one would have to wonder how a Turkish official could turn to sodomy. But perversion seems to be the story of Esau and a huge number of his descendants.
Like other Christians and atheists and the Edomite progenitor Esau, many modern Edomites miscegenate and defile their racial seed lines with anything and everything--just like most Christians do and significantly more in contrast to what some true Jews would tend to do. The rest of this chapter and succeeding presentations will address their sexual proclivities.
A Genetic Problem
Since it takes three generations to breed the evil thinking out of these Edomites, their children and grandchildren continue to function with the mind-set of their wicked Edomite ancestors (Ex 20:5; Deut 23:8). The miscegenated Herod family is a classic Scriptural example of this phenomenon.
In today’s modern perverted world, where open homosexuality is practiced and no one in leadership seems to condemn it, questions continue to surface over whether homosexuality is an inherited genetic problem; or alternatively, is it simply an acquired empirical habit/practice?
This writer is not prepared to suggest that it is always, sometimes or even infrequently due to genetics. On the contrary, it probably is an acquired practice of sin (due to a number of environmental factors). However, in some families, like with the Amalekites, one must wonder to what extent the phenomenon is traceable to genes (since such an inordinate number of Amalekites are practicing queers).
There is a curse in the Torah associated with the second commandment on idolatry--in that the sins of parents are visited upon children (Ex 20:5). Without being dogmatic, this writer has wondered if in “some” (not necessarily all) instances, homosexuality is traceable to certain sins of a parent. Is it possible that a homosexual demon attaches to a family or children to introduce perversion?
In early 2002, an explosion ripped through the US Catholic Church when revelations began to surface of the enormous presence of faggot, pedophile priests within the church who have been abusing thousands of children over the years. This problem will be addressed in a later chapter.
It is unclear how many of these perverts are Edomites; but surely, many or most of them are since the Edomite Irish and Italian peoples are so prevalent in the Roman Catholic Church. There is also a significant presence of Amalekites in Catholicism, as noted earlier. Suffice to say, these evil preachers are undoubtedly operating under powerful demonic influence. Surely, they have many attached demons.
As a minimum, it must be asserted that many of the dedicated homosexual faggots do have attached demons (as was assessed in a prior chapter). To what extent these demons arise in connection with the sins of a parent versus the sins of the child is uncertain. Probably, most can be attributed to the sins of the person so hooked. But the door must be left open in some instances to a parental problem.
The Evil Ancestry of the Amalekites
This (Amalek-Edomite) Khazar propensity for evil can logically be traced back to Nachash, Cain, Ham, Canaan and Esau. Historically, in the Tanakh, these five individuals were some of the most evil and depraved beings in all of history. Esau’s descendants have followed in the same footsteps.
Clearly, the problem with these individuals seems to be genetics! As ancient Jewish authorities stipulated over 2,000 years ago, the Amalekites, in particular, are totally evil. If this is true, as learned Jewish sages have believed and taught for ages, then it becomes crystal clear that there must be a genetic factor present in the Amalekite make-up to induce them to be so incredibly wicked and depraved.
The Apostle Shaul well stated the Amalek-Edomite dilemma when he wrote that when people abandon The MOST HIGH and His righteousness, YHWH gives them over to their vile affections and emotions--to include homosexuality (Rom 1:26-27), as is commonly found among the Amalekites. Maybe Shaul’s remarks tie to the second commandment in some way.
It would seem that homosexuality might could be due to genetics to some extent and certainly in the case of the depraved Amalekites--since such a vast number of Amalekites are queers and since sexual perversion has been a part and parcel of their make-up from the early days of the Exodus (to be next addressed).
Piska 3
A previous chapter quoted Piska 3 from “Pesikta De-Rab Kahana” (p. 38) which reported that in Amalek’s first attack on Yisrael during the Exodus, Amalek lured Israelites from their camp so that they would be killed and polluted by pederasty.
While details of these sexual perversions upon Israelites do not seem to be available, a little logic can crystallize the possibilities. Perhaps the Amalekites engaged in sodomy with helpless captured Israelites or sodomized their dead corpses in some manner.
In modern 20th century Satanism and other occult activities, sexual rituals are often associated with human murder and sacrifice. A later chapter herein will focus on some of these on-going activities. Suffice to say, Satan’s Amalek-Edomite descendants would be prone for any type of sodomite perversion that could surface as a part of their murdering and killing efforts of Israelites.
Sodomite Amalekites
For a Scriptural basis on how the Amalekites tried to pollute Yisrael with pederasty, Piska 3 notes the words “How he met thee by the way” (Deut 25:18), which come from the Hebrew krk (kyrk). This reference is elsewhere used in the Torah in the situation where a man has a nocturnal emission of semen which makes him unclean, necessitating that he leave the camp (Deut 23:10-11).
R. Judah interpreted “krk” as meaning “he befouled thee with his (Amalek’s) semen (by subjecting thee to sodomy).” In other words, Judah did not see the problem with the Amalekites as being nocturnal emissions; but rather, as being one of sodomy as practiced by the Amalekites upon the Israelites (“Pesikta De-Rab Kahana,” p. 51-52).
The gist of this is that there are some possible Scriptural reasons suggesting that very early in the history of the Amalekites, they had a record of sodomy in their ranks. Also, the evidence seems to be that they tried to teach or impose their sodomite practices on some of the gullible, stupid Israelites.
It must be important to note that the Amalekites and perhaps some of their Canaanite friends dwelt in the Rift vale or valley (Hebrew “emeq”), evidently South of the Dead Sea (Num 14:25). The Scriptures use this same Hebrew word to describe the place of dwelling of the Sodomites in Avraham’s day (Gen 14:3-17).
Actually, the vale involved with the Sodomites was apparently at the Southern or Southeastern edge of the Dead Sea. It appears that some of the Amalekites lived in this same precise area which was probably a part of the greater definition of Edom. Is it not significant that the Amalekites inhabited the same area where the homosexual fags lived in Sodom and Gomorrah? Yes, it seems like it is!
A Line of Queers
Incidentally, this sexual depravity and social sickness of the Amalek-Edomites goes back a long way in their genealogy and long before their likely homosexual escapades at the Exodus. It clearly started early with their ancestors Nachash, Kain, Ham and Esau.
In the Greek sun worship theology and polytheistic religion, the father god Zeus was a representation of Satan, the real sun god in mythology. In the worship of Zeus and the other Greek gods as well, there were attempts to conceptionalize them and see many of them in a human form in various situations.
Hence, paintings, pictures and representations of the long haired, effeminate Zeus became objects of worship in the Greek sun worship civilization. The interesting thing about Zeus is that he was a queer--a bi-sexual faggot. Since Zeus was a type of personification of the real sun god Satan, the reality of homosexuality is well established.
Obviously, Nachash or Satan was the classic queer of all time. He was the original Curious (Greek “Kurious”), recognized as the “Lord or Baal” in the OT (“The Last Warning to Man,” p. B). He probably was the first male character to wear long hair, shave and be effeminate. Apparently, he became proud over his rebellious long hair (even today, the presence of long hair on a man is symbolic of rebellion).
Satan’s pride has been well known. But its cause has escaped the minds of most students. Perhaps The CREATOR made woman to be feminine with long hair (in Satan’s image) to demonstrate how she can achieve reconciliation by learning humility and submission, which were the qualities absent from the effeminate Adversary (ibid, p. B).
Satan’s son Kain also had sexual problems, as discussed in prior chapters.
Specifically, previous chapters focused on Cain who advocated the worshipping of the sensual powers (“Mystery Babylon The Great,” p. 9). Over time, sex worship became an inherent part of sun worship, as will be assessed in subsequent chapters herein. This pagan worship extended on down to Ham and certainly his son Canaan. Allegations of Ham being a bisexual were assessed in a prior chapter.
Suffice to say, the line of Cain had problems and Esau had the propensity of mixing his seedline with these various fallen peoples, as noted in the previous chapters. No wonder homosexuality is so common among the Edomites and particularly with Amalekites. Surely, the Amalekites are right in the ball park with the gross depravity present in ancient Sodom and Gomorrah.
The General Indictment
But there is more to come on this from the “Jewish Chumash” (quoted in the Mar 1998 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 31), which indicates from the genealogies of Genesis and Chronicles that many of Esau’s descendants were products of incest and illegitimacy.
Actually, according to the famous Rashi (Rav Solomon bar Isaac, who was born in France in 1040 and lived until 1105), in his commentary on Genesis 36, all of Esau’s children were (are) sons of incest, adultery and illicit sex (Apr 2001 “End Time News,” p. 2).
Whether all of Esau’s descendants are/were born of perverted sex or just many of them is not totally clear in history. But manifestly, many were, as the Scriptures outline!
Some Specifics on the Problems
Former chapters have discussed the situation with Esau and his several wives and the resulting deception associated with these women and their children with Esau. As previously noted, one of Esau’s wives was Oholibamah, perhaps a mixed Hivite and Horite (Gen 36:2-5,19-21). She used the alias of Judith in order to try to deceive various people (as reported in a former chapter).
As pointed out in the previous discussion, it seems to have been Esau who promoted this name change by Oholibamah. As previously quoted, the “Soncino Books of the Bible” (v. I, p. 215) said that Esau changed her name to deceive Yitzhak into believing that she was not an idolatress.
In any case, this business of changing names has come to completely characterize the descendants of Esau. The Amalekite descendants of Esau are particularly notorious about changing their names. They do this regularly wherever they go or relocate around the world (as described in previous comments).
More on Oholibamah
Otherwise, this Oholibamah is an extremely complicated person, as will now be shown. She is first mentioned in Genesis 36:2 as the daughter of Anah, who was the daughter of Zibeon the Hivite. Yet, Anah is elsewhere shown to be the “son” of Zibeon and not a daughter at all (Gen 36:24). But there are more problems on this confused family.
Specifically, a commentary on the “Jewish Chumash” says that Genesis 36:2 actually “implies that Oholibamah was the daughter of two fathers, Anah and Zibeon, an obvious impossibility. Furthermore, verse 24 describes Anah as Zibeon’s son (as just noted above--ed). Consequently, our verse implies that Zibeon cohabited with his own daughter-in-law, Anah’s wife, and Oholibamah was the product of their adultery. Thus, she and all her offspring were illegitimate.”
But there are more complications here because I Chronicles 1:38 indicates that Anah and Zibeon were brothers and sons of Seir (the Horite). This peculiarity suggests that Zibeon actually cohabited with his own mother (wife of Seir) to produce Anah (who was, thus, both his brother and his son--Apr 2001 “End Time News,” p. 3).
An earlier discussion on Esau’s wives allowed that Oholibamah could have been a mixed Hivite-Horite. Her actual racial status seems confused in the Genesis remarks. In any case, the Word seems to indicate that Anah was a Horite (Gen 36:20), while Zibeon was both a Hivite (Gen 36:2) and a Horite (Gen 36:20).
The question then arises to ask if the Horites were, in fact, Hivites? Or were they a mixture of some sort? This dilemma was discussed in a previous chapter with remarks from the book of Jasher--which suggested that Seir was the son of Hur (the Horite), who was the son of Hivi, who was the son of Canaan, who was the son of Ham.
Still other problems seem to also materialize with Oholibamah. She had a son named Korah, implying Esau was the father (Gen 36:5). However, Korah is identified as a son of Eliphaz (Gen 36:15-16). Yet, the Tanakh list of the sons of Eliphaz does not mention Korah (Gen 36:11-12; I Chron 1:36).
The “Jewish Chumash” (p. 215) explains this dilemma by noting that Korah was born illegitimately to Oholibamah from an affair she had with Eliphaz, her husband’s oldest son. Apparently, Korah was brought up by and lived with his father Eliphaz, certainly by the time of his maturity.
Still More
But there is still some more potential problems with this Esau marriage to Oholibamah, also apparently known as Judith, as mentioned previously (Gen 26:34). The Word seems to say that this woman gave Esau three sons--Jeush, Jaalam and possibly Korah. With the problems over Korah, what about the other two? This question must surface when one looks at some comments in the book of Jasher.
This source suggests that Judith had no sons, but daughters only (Jasher 30:21). If Judith was Oholibamah, she apparently did have three sons (Gen 36:5). While Jasher is not authoritative Scripture, as is Genesis, one must still wonder about this obvious conflict. If the book of Jasher was written after the Torah, surely its writer would have had access to Moshe’s writings and would hardly have written a direct contradiction.
It might be that just as Korah was illegitimate and did not belong to Esau, so also maybe Jeush and Jaalam were illegitimate and were not sons of Esau. Thus, it could be that Jasher has it right in the context that Oholibamah had no sons, but only daughters with Esau.
Further Edomite Depravity
Another dilemma surfaces when one focuses on Timna, the concubine of Eliphaz (Gen 36:12). Elsewhere, she is identified as a sister of Lotan (son of Seir) and thus, an aunt of Oholibamah (Gen 36:20-22). Yet, Timna does not seem to be reckoned as a daughter of Seir. I Chronicles 1:36 mentions that Eliphaz had a child named Timna.
While it is certainly possible that Seir had a daughter named Timna, who became concubine to Eliphaz or that Seir’s wife had Timna by another man, and while it is also surely reasonable that Eliphaz could have had a daughter whom he named Timna, the Jewish Chumash otherwise raises some concern over this situation.
The Chumash (p. 216) allows that Eliphaz may have cohabited with Seir’s wife and had Timna; thus making her his daughter. Hence, she could have been a half-sister to Lotan and yet not be counted as a child of Seir. On maturing, the Chumash (p. 216) suggests that Eliphaz then took Timna, his own daughter, as concubine to have Amalek.
While this unique approach to Timna could have some merit and deserves study, this writer believes that the Timna in I Chronicles 1:36 was, in fact, a son, since the context so reads. “Young’s Analytical Concordance” (p. 990) agrees on the son definition.
Admittedly, it would be questionable that a man would name a son after the mother, but it cannot be ruled out in the situation with the wicked Edomites. Perversion and deception both characterize the evil Edomites.