EZEKIEL
and YHWH’s
Judgment
for the
Good News
PEOPLE
VOLUME XX
Christian IQ Levels
EZEKIEL and YHWH’s
Judgment for the
Good News People
Volume XX--Christian IQ Levels
by
an unworthy servant
And you shall know the truth,
and the truth will make you free.
(John 8:32)
Common Law Copyright, 2003 & 2005 CE, an unworthy servant, Calder, Idaho. The author claims his Right of exclusive ownership and control of this publication, the fruit of his labor, as a matter of Intellectual Property protected by the Laws of YHWH and as guaranteed by the US Constitution for the United States. Permission is granted to quote provided appropriate credit is cited together with the Publisher’s web site name and postal mailing address––WWW.AgeEnd.Com PO Box 473, Calder, ID 83808, USA.
Contents
Volume XX--Christian IQ Levels
CHAPTER PAGE
- Cover Page 1
- Title Page 2
- Contents 3
- Publisher’s Preface 5
Part JJJ--Christian Media
298 Media Hypocrites I 6
299 Media Hypocrites II 18
300 Media Hypocrites III 34
301 The Spin I 50
302 The Spin II 66
Part KKK--Realities of Christian Humanism
303 Christian Humanism in Action 81
304 Gun Controls 85
305 Crime and Punishment 99
306 The Welfare State 108
307 Financing Christian Humanism I 117
308 Financing Christian Humanism II 125
309 Indians, Greed and Taxes 132
310 Christian Humanism’s Tactics 136
Part LLL--Humanistic Control
311 Christian Humanism and Control 146
312 More Humanism and Control 154
SHEERIT YISRAEL
PO Box 473
Calder, Idaho 83808, USA
Publisher’s Preface
Greetings! The following presentation is volume twenty of a 36-volume production of some 6,000 pages on “Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good News People,” all of which is on the Internet at the www.AgeEnd.com web site.
This overall effort provides an interpretation of the Good News message in the New Testament, its linkage to the book of Ezekiel, and an application of both to the age-end prophecies relating to certain nations and peoples now out in the world. In order for this single volume to be understood and comprehended, it is imperative that the study be read from its beginning--from page one of volume one.
Anyone trying to read this volume or the study’s 6,000 pages at any mid-point will end up in a state of confusion without having read and digested the preceding material. It is crucially important that this work be read in sequence from its beginning--otherwise, the reader will almost certainly end up missing the essence of the message!
The effort was originally set on a Macintosh computer with Microsoft Word 6.0.1. It was set in Helvetica, 12-point type (18 pt on chapter headings); single line spacings; and margins: left 1.2”, right 0.8”, top 0.7”, bottom 0.8” and footer 0.6” (for page numbers).
For further information on obtaining this study in 18 computer floppy disks (IBM-formatted, high density, 2HD, 1.44 MB, 3 1/2 inches); in a single CD-Rom; or in hard copies (when the Internet or a compatible computer is not available); please write the publisher at the above address and send a stamped, self-addressed, long (legal-size), return envelope.
With a CD-Rom or computer floppy disks, the study is readable on Macintosh (systems 5.0 and later) or IBM/compatible (with Microsoft Word-Windows) personal computers. May The Great CREATOR and SOVEREIGN OF THE UNIVERSE bless you as you study His word to learn His will and to obey Him. Shalom (peace) to you and yours!
an unworthy servant, Hanukkah 2003 CE
Chapter 298--Media Hypocrites I
Thomas Jefferson
The great populist American President, Thomas Jefferson, said in 1807 that “Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper” (Apr 8, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 20).
The difference between 1807 and today in 2003 is that back then there was some honor and integrity in the United States. Today, these concepts are largely void and blank issues.
The Media’s Impact
Since the political liberals have been in charge in America (under Amalekite leadership, as discussed earlier), and attitudes have changed, they have gained a tremendous forum in the American media and entertainment industries (with the approval of the fat cat, super rich bankers and Illuminati who own and control those entities--this reality will be broached in later chapters of this work).
It almost goes without saying that most Hollywood celebrities and television news reporters are very liberal, in addition to being classic humanists (as will be detailed in the following chapters). It probably would be incorrect to charge many of them with being fundamental or conservative Christians. But many of them are identified as either liberal or permissive Christians or Jews or at least New Age ideologists.
These left wing liberals do everything that they humanly can do in their power to promote liberalism, Socialism and humanism under Amalekite bankers/masters (as will be addressed later).
Yellow Journalism
News reporters and television anchors will almost always practice “yellow” journalism. They are classic hypocrites.
Therefore, stories which are adverse or hostile to their ideology are just not reported. And if they must appear in a newspaper, then they are typically hid in small print on one of the back pages.
Too, many of the leading journalists and reporters will slant stories and reports in such a fashion that they completely distort the truth about what really happened. It’s not hard at all for a reporter or editor to play up and say favorable things in stories with their liberal objectives; while hiding, playing down or criticizing a contrary position.
The press and media do this regularly and no one says much about it at all. Well, of course, if a person does object, where would he/she publicly complain? In the media?
Not only would the media allow much, if any, of complaints to surface; but if they do come out, then the media responds by editorially criticizing and condemning the complainant and by casting ridicule and contempt on the person who would dare speak out. The liberal MO is to always attack personalities and avoid facts.
An article on “How the Government Works... (you over) The Fourth Branch” in the Dec 1997 “Idaho Observer” (p. 2) focused on the media and called it the “Fourth Branch.” The story went on to say that without the media aiding cover-ups, distorting facts, missing punchlines and generally lying to the public, politicians would be serving us, instead of selling us out.
An Illustration
Two good examples of media prejudice and bias exist in the vein of the right-wing and guns (two subjects which the controlled media hates with a passion). There is no way that a right-winger or pro second amendment person is going to get a fair shake in the media. The controlled media with use spin, yellow journalism, lies, distortions and news manipulation to no end to try to destroy right-wingers.
One of the classic cases of media bias and dishonesty surfaced in late July 1999 when a man named Mark Barton, a day stock trader, killed eleven people in Atlanta, Georgia and then committed suicide.
First, Barton took a hammer and beat his wife and small son and daughter to death. Next, he went to two stock brokerage offices and shot and killed eight more people at random with a gun before killing himself (Aug 9, 1999, “US News & World Report,” p. 22).
Certainly, of the two murder incidents, the most horrible, sickening and tragic one was the use of the hammer to bludgeon the heads of his wife and children. This was terrible beyond description. It’s not to say that the other murders were not bad. They were. But their significance didn’t reach the level of using the hammer to kill his wife and children.
That the man was very obviously totally crazy goes without saying. He had major problems. But there is another tragedy to this pathetic and tragic story. It surfaced in the way the media handled the case.
Other than slightly mentioning the murders of the wife and children, nothing much was said about the cruelty and horror that they faced in their murders. Instead, the media focus was entirely upon the guns and the shootings in downtown Atlanta. The media cried, moaned and groaned for days and days about the evil guns.
The NRA
In an article on “NRA Exec VP Exposes Media Manipulation,” in the Nov 15, 1999, “Spotlight” (p. B-3), National Rifle Association Vice President Wayne LaPierre said that the media just swept the lives of the kids and mother aside so that the media focus could be directed to the guns and what hurt they caused.
The AP news headline in America said “Atlanta Shooting Spree Forced Gun Debate to Extremes--Use of Legal Weapons Raises Questions of Ban on Handguns.” Josh Sugarman of the Violence Policy Center stated that “Unless we start talking about banning handguns in this country, this is America’s future.” LaPierre noted that no one called for hammer control.
Actually, the way the media handled these murders in Atlanta is common. The fact that guns were involved was national news of the most importance. Reporters in the major papers and television networks could and did talk about the guns on and on. Evidence that the man was totally insane and the horrors of the murders of the woman and children were totally lost in America.
Incidentally, a story by Lily Nguyen on “Study finds 10-to-1 imbalance in news reports on guns,” in the Jan 10-16, 2000, “Washington Times” (p. 14), quoted L. Brent Bozell, III, chairman of the Media Research Center, who noted a recent study which showed that the media is a partisan player on the subject of guns.
A two year study of 635 stories on gun policy (from ABC, NBC, CBS and CNN) indicated that 357 gun stories were anti-guns, 36 were pro-guns and 260 were neutral. This is an amazing ten to one ratio favoring gun control laws. The morning talk programs from the networks were even more one-sided in their attacks upon guns.
The Nut Buford Furrow, Revisited
Another good illustration of media prejudice surfaced just after a nut named Buford Furrow shot up a Jewish Community Center in Los Angeles, as briefly cited earlier (he killed no one at the center; but later, he shot and killed a US postman, making him a federal criminal). Though this Furrow shooting event has been or will be assessed in further detail elsewhere herein, some facets about it need to be covered now.
Immediately, “Newsweek” (of Aug 23, 1999) published almost an entire issue on the evils of guns. The front cover page had a picture of a gun and the words “America Under the Gun.”
From there on, “Newsweek had a whole series of articles (almost covering the entire magazine) on how bad guns were and why more gun laws are needed. There was almost nothing said about personal responsibility (as discussed herein, in a prior chapter).
About the only pro-gun comments that this issue of “Newsweek” allowed into the discussion was a short interview with the just quoted Wayne LaPierre, executive vice-president of the National Rifle Association. While “Newsweek” printed this interview, one can be absolutely sure that she edited it and edited out anything that would go against her pitch of hate upon guns.
Besides the focus upon guns, mentioned above on Buford Furrow, this same issue of “Newsweek” also had an attack article upon the racialist right wing, as evidenced by the Aryan Nations/Church of Jesus Christ Christian in North Idaho. This article will be discussed in later comments herein in the context of the shooter Buford Furrow.
Also, why is it or how is that a man who identifies with the Christian Identity movement, like the just mentioned nut, Buford Furrow, has his religion splattered all over the national media network when he shoots up some kids (killing none of them), in contrast to literally hundreds of thousands of other murders which never even receive a comment from the media and certainly nothing about the religions or religious beliefs of the murderers?
Two More Non-Gun Cases
Wayne LaPierre’s article in the November 15, 1999, “Spotlight,” discussed above, also mentioned some school shootings (which will be commented upon in subsequent chapters herein). When a student illegally takes a gun onto school property (and it is illegal to have a gun within several hundred yards of a school) and kills one or more students, this becomes major news in the US, as LaPierre noted.
But what about the situation where a man named Steven Allen Abraham drove his automobile onto a school yard on May 4, 1999, at Costa Mesa, California to kill a three year old girl and a four year old girl, plus maiming four other kids, as LaPierre pointed out. Abraham said that he was going to execute these children “because they were innocent.” In other words, it was murder and not an accident.
Yet, this was “no news” in the national media. Why was it unimportant as a news item? If the man would have used a gun to shoot some children in a school yard, it would have been headline news. The nightly TV programs and politicians would have belabored it almost without end.
As late as November 28, 1999, a crazy man with a sword went into a Catholic Church in London, England during worship services. He seriously injured six people with the sword before finally being subdued. Since this nut used a sword, the event was almost a no news item in the US national media. If a man had went into a church with a gun and shot the place up, it would have been major news for days and days.
More From Britain
Incidentally, the British have a significant limitation on guns in their island kingdom. Since guns are generally not allowed, one can perhaps see why the above nut used a sword. But restrictive gun laws were of no relevance.
“Spotlight” of Mar 13, 2000, had a news report from Britain which said that both guns and crime are up there. Drive by shootings and gangland executions are both rising, despite the gun control laws.
Per the story, some three million guns have been illegally smuggled into Britain in the last few years (allegedly from Eastern Europe). Many of these weapons are now in the hands of young thugs--15 to 25 years old (surely, many racial minorities in Britain now have guns). Obviously, gun control laws do not and cannot stop the use of guns in violence.
The Feb 2002 “American Sentinel” (p. 4) had a follow-up report from Britain (via the BBC). BBC said that between April and November of 2001, the number of murders involving firearms was up some 90% over a year ago in the London police area. The BBC said that “Although all privately-owned handguns in Britain are now officially illegal, the tightened rules seem to have had little impact on the criminal underworld.”
A news report from Australia noted the situation there in early 2002, following a year of the government’s gun buy-back program. Since the Australian Big Brother has been collecting guns from the common people (who no longer have the means of protecting themselves), crime has been going up--homicides are up 3.2%, assaults are up 8.6%, and robberies are up 44% (Apr 22, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 2).
Of course, this is precisely what will happen; and indeed, was expected to happen. Outlaw the guns and it will be only law-abiding citizens who conform to the law. The criminals and law violators will never turn their guns in or stop buying guns (which, like dope and drugs, will always be available for the right price).
The Latest British Reaction
News reports in early January 2003 took note of the explosion in crime in Britain involving guns and the fact that numbers of criminals have access to guns while the British police and law-abiding population do not have guns.
The anti-gun laws in Britain make it illegal for law-abiding people to have guns. Thus, the only people with guns are crooks, gang members and other criminals who obtain them illegally.
Because of the increase in gun crime, British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s government proposed on January 6, 2003, to tighten “Britain’s already tough firearms laws” (Jan 7, 2003, Spokane “Spokesman-Review,” p. 2). The ruling leftist Labor party wants to make tougher prison sentences for the illegal possession of firearms.
Currently, there is no minimum sentence (apparently meaning that judges can be lenient in sentencing persons caught with a gun). Blair’s people want a minimum prison sentence of five years for anyone caught with an illegal gun.
Of course, none of this will prove anything because it does not address the basic problem. These British fools can pass all the gun laws that they want to, and it will not change the reality that criminals, crooks and gang members can always obtain guns. It will always be only law-abiding people who obey these stupid gun laws. Law violators will continue to ignore them.
The People Problem
Yes, the problem is not one of guns or gun control laws; but rather, the problem lies with people.
In the case of the United States, it is manifest that the presidential leadership of the nation has been morally corrupt for many years now. No wonder people commit crimes. No wonder small 12 year girls are now giving boys oral sex. They only follow the role model of the former US president.
A discussion on the Art Bell Coast to Coast AM radio talk show program on Jan 19, 2000, noted that far more people die each year in the US from medical malpractice than from guns (250,000 deaths annually from doctors and bad drugs, as discussed earlier). Yet, no one talks about the evils of doctors and the establishment approved drugs and surgery methods.
A news report over National Public Radio on May 16, 2002, noted that there is some concern over the deaths of children from hypothermia because parents leave children in locked cars while they go shopping, attending to business, or pursuing some personal matter. Since 1996, some 150 children have died as a result of this gross stupidity. In 2001, some 30 died in the US alone.
If the loving and concerned liberals and humanists are so profoundly worried over the deaths of people and particularly small children (who are burned alive in a parked, locked car), why don’t they focus some national attention on the incompetence of doctors and pharmacists as well as on the irresponsible actions of parents who leave small children in locked cars on hot days.
Yet, the controlled media and the loving liberal and humanist humanitarians don’t seem to be much concerned with the murders of people by doctors, pharmacists or pharmaceutical companies. For sure, the irresponsible action of parents in murdering their small kids in locked cars on hot days receives virtually no appreciable interest from anyone in authority in America.
Sometimes, it seems that the controlled media and its loving liberal and humanist colleagues have only a focus on guns for their acts of love and concern for the American people. Truly, they are obsessed with guns and the alleged evils of the second amendment to the United States Constitution.
The Dangers of Airplanes
How about airplane crashes which periodically occur and kill hundreds of people in one sweep. Take the case of TWA flight 800 from New York to Paris on July 17, 1996. As will be covered in a later chapter, the evidence is that 800 was shot down by a US Navy missile. Yet, the national media has said nothing about the death of the 230 passengers, along this line.
On Oct 31, 1999, an Egypt Airline flight 990 from New York to Cairo turned into a disaster when something happened with the plane to cause it to crash into the Atlantic Ocean with some 217 people on board.
In late 1999, investigators could not say for sure what occurred. But this event had much in common with an affiliate of Singapore Airlines, Silk Air Flight M185 on Dec 19,1997, where a suicide pilot crashed his plane in Indonesia to kill 104 people.
An Egypt Air relief pilot on flight 990 (named Gamel al-Batouti, who had taken the place of the regular co-pilot) was suspected of sabotaging the plane in a suicide action, while the pilot was momentarily absent from the controls. Batouti was allegedly a religious Muslim, who was at the controls as the trouble developed.
Batouti was heard on the voice recorder as saying a Moslem prayer some 14 times--starting just before and continuing on while the plane was diving into the ocean (Nov 29, 1999, “Newsweek,” p. 33). The words of the prayer is that the speaker is putting his trust in Allah. However, some Muslims claim that the prayer is a routine one which religious Muslims speak before driving a car or cooking a meal.
Although the Muslim faith is usually against suicide, there are occasions when it is proper for those in a holy war in the service of Allah (a jihad?). Reportedly, some Muslim sects actually teach that if members die in the army of Allah, they are immediately conveyed to the Islamic heaven where they can be surrounded by beautiful women, eat pork and drink wine (some things forbidden on earth).
The present Egyptian government has been at serious odds with Muslim fundamentalists for some time. Many of the Muslims have been mad at Egyptian President Mubarak for negotiating peace with Israel and for the close ties Egypt has had with the United States. Some 33 Egyptian Air Force officers, trained in the US, were on flight 990. So there would have been a reason for the plane to come down.
Since Batouti’s religion was patently relevant and could have been implicated as a cause in his action, it had to be mentioned. Otherwise, the controlled media would have said nothing about it.
But the controlled media is never silent about incidents involving people in the right wing, Christian Identity Church. Anytime one of these racialists do something wrong, his religion becomes a major news item.
Possibilities
While suicide by Batouti was the plausible explanation, Muslims discounted the idea. It appears that there is a significant belief among Muslims that the Zionists were involved in sabotaging the plane to bring it down (Oct-Dec 1999 “Hebrew Roots,” p. 31). Per this view, the 33 Egyptian Air Force officers were mostly pilots. They were the target since they could be a military threat to the state of Israel.
There is still one more option. There was also the possibility of a plane malfunction and possible incompetence on the part of the crew. In 1996, a similar plane, flown by Martinair, an affiliate of KLA, experienced a series of malfunctions due to a strange computer failure (from a loose battery connection) while over the Atlantic (Nov 15, 1999, “Newsweek,” p. 70).
The Dutch crew was competent and was able to bring the plane into Boston for an emergency landing. As “Newsweek” suggested, this Martinair flight could also have some similarities with Egypt Air 990.
Certainly, the cockpit voice recorder from 990 indicated that there was a problem and at least the Captain was attempting to resolve it when the plane plunged into the ocean. Whether Batouti was helping or hindering the Captain’s effort to pull the plane out of the dive was unclear. Some said that he was helping, while others said that he was pulling against the Captain.
Another Twist
On the airplane problem, something totally ignored by the national media surfaced in a report from Chris Ruddy in the Nov 1999 “Internet Vortex” (p. 12). Ruddy was flying out of JFK airport on a United flight at around 9:15 AM on Oct 31, 1999. He put his headset on and tuned into transmissions between his plane and air traffic control in the US.
Ruddy said that air traffic control people were advising airplanes to change their flight paths and were giving new coordinates and altitudes over the Atlantic. The reason reported for this alteration was that “there are rockets being fired in the area.” The Egypt Air flight had went down--just some seven hours before Ruddy’s United flight.
Now, to something ignored by the national media--there was a strange correlation between what happened with 990 and what had happened earlier with TWA flight 800 (which was possibly shot down by a missile attack, as will be addressed in later chapters). This correlation will be assessed in a later chapter.
While all of these events were significant enough to receive a little national news coverage, they all were largely forgotten within a few days. None of the controlled media came out with front page stories about the dangers of airplanes. There was never any appreciable talk of new laws or of grounding airplanes.
No one in public condemned the apparent missile attack on 800. No one much complained over the suicide of the pilot in M185. Very few persons were concerned over the possible suicide of the relief pilot or the incompetence of the crew or the rocket attack on 990.
Yet, if someone had used a gun and shot and killed 104, 217 or 230 people in one incident, there would be no end to the news reports. Clinton would have called Congress into special session and all of the national media would have had front page coverage of the evils of guns--until new laws were passed to further erode the benefits of the second amendment to the US Constitution.
The Muslims’ use of knives and box openers to hijack four airliners to crash into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on Sep 11, 2001, offers a classic case of hypocrisy (as will be discussed in some detail in later chapters).
Can anyone begin to grasp what would have happened if the Muslims would have used guns instead of knives, box openers and airplanes? The media would have flipped and Slick Clinton would have come out of retirement to lead the protest against guns.
Why Guns?
Inevitably, the question must be asked on why there is then this fanatical focus by the controlled media and the leftists upon guns? After all, there are a multitude of things in the modern, Western, Christian society which are far more troubling than guns (like airplanes, locked cars with children inside, doctors, pharmacists and pharmaceutical companies).
This reality has been demonstrated in numerous reports over the years. Perhaps the best illustration surfaced in a news report on “Guns: Another side of the story” in the Mar 22, 2002. “The Week” (p. 10). The essence of this account was that if a person subtracts out all of the US homicides attributed to firearms, the resulting US murder figure is still higher than that in some other countries (like Japan, Britain and Sweden).
This same story had some remarks on research done by scholars like John R. Lott of Yale University. Lott made a study which showed that when US states allow citizens to carry concealed weapons, violent crime and murder rates fall. Over the past several years, homes that are allowed to have guns are far less susceptible of burglaries and crime.
Incidentally, the Lott study received almost no media coverage. As “The Week” noted, the press is just not interested in stories like this! For sure, there is a US people problem which the controlled media simply refuses to acknowledge.
This and succeeding chapters will address the hypocrisy over guns and will ultimately demonstrate that the problem isn’t over guns; but instead, there is a desire from these loving leftists to bring on a world government. And guns in the hands of the people are a threat to the establishment of world government. Therefore, guns must be outlawed.
Jasper, Texas
Actually, of all topics which are subjected to media bias, distortion and twisting, the issue of race probably receives the more hypocritical and unfair reporting from the controlled media--more so than guns, which is also grossly and unfairly reported upon.
In June 1998, news reports said that three White men (reportedly, with some participation of a Black colleague [per Charles A. Weisman, Box 240844, Apple Valley, MN 55124], which the controlled media routinely ignored) in Jasper, Texas were guilty of a hate crime because they had murdered another Black man by dragging his body behind their pickup truck.
And on the surface, this was a horrible crime, regardless of the races of the people involved. But murder is fairly common in America (and even by federal agents, as when they slaughtered some 86 Branch Davidian men, women and children [24 children in total] in Waco, Texas and a small boy and a innocent woman, holding her baby at Ruby Ridge in North Idaho, as will be assessed in subsequent chapters).
Hundreds of thousands of people have been murdered in America over the years and there is no particular outcry among the US media and population.
“Bible Light On The News” (v. 5, No. 7, p. 3) gives these US murder statistics. Currently, some 20,000 to 25,000 people are murdered each year in the US. This translates to 200,000 to 250,000 in the last ten years.
Murder is as American as motherhood and apple pie. Every day and night, numbers of people die in the nation’s Black capital--Washington, DC. Yet, no one seems to get excited over the huge numbers of daily murders.
In particular, Mob killings can involve torture and some of them are very nasty (far worse than the Texas killing of the Negro). Some of the people with connections to Slick Clinton have faced gruesome murders and the media has expressed little concern over these deaths.
So, why the big fuss for days and days over the Texas murder. Well, it allegedly involved a Black victim of White killers (although a Black man also was involved in the killing). Actually, this is quite unusual because normally most criminal violence involves Black criminals killing and assaulting White victims in the integrated culture and each other among the Blacks themselves.
Biased Reporting
Actually, there was still one other factor of truth that almost no one even considered or talked about in terms of the Jasper, Texas event.
The truth is that the American public was told certain things about this reported crime from a controlled media which is notorious for slanting, tilting and twisting news reports to further a particular agenda, and especially, the present agenda on race and racial integration.
How bad was this reported crime from Jasper, Texas? Who knows? It could have been as bad as NBC, CBS, CNN and ABC reported. But the controlled media has a common objective of presenting certain stories, using at least yellow journalism and other employments of twisting and distorting information to accomplish its goals.
True, the media presented the case as a horrible crime. And it may have been. It’s just that the controlled media is so biased and so wretched in terms of lying and deceiving the public that it’s hard for most informed observers to be precisely sure of exactly what did happen in Texas (like with the failure to discuss the involved Black man in the killing).
However, as bad as it may have been, the media will make it appear far worse for the involved Whites--to fit its evil agenda of making White people look bad and wicked, while building up the Coloreds to make them look like American heroes, motherhood and apple pie.
Media Hypocrites
There was another feature of this Jasper, Texas incident which received no news coverage or reporting at all. As brought out in the July 1998 “America’s Promise Newsletter” (p. 1), this incident caused a number of militant Black groups (Black Muslims, Black Panthers, etc) to come to Jasper for a march.
The Negroes participating in this march were, by and large, armed with guns and publicly brandished them without fear of restraint or opposition from authorities. The liberal, biased newscasts and reporters said absolutely nothing about this army of armed and antagonistic Blacks.
The question comes up--what would have happened if a Black had murdered a White person (which happens in about 89% of interracial murders) and if the local White population staged a march with the men carrying arms? The media would have went wild in hate and condemnation.
All the major news networks would have had cameramen and reporters on the spot, making news casts about how horrible and evil the Whites were. Slick Clinton would have ordered in an army of FBI agents and other federal provocateurs to arrest and intimidate the Whites.
Many Whites would have been jailed and the whole population would have been hyped up with intense bitterness and hatred toward the Whites for daring to come out in public with guns showing. Assuredly, the liberals would have cried on and on for new gun laws and a crackdown on White, right wing “extremists,” as they would have been branded.
A Pleasanton, Texas Case
Concurrently with the Jasper, Texas case and its front page news coverage for days and days, another murder took place in Pleasanton, Texas which received absolutely no attention from the national media.
In this one, a gunman shot and murdered three, White, Texas state policemen to death, after luring them to a trailer park with a 911 telephone call. He then shot and killed himself. Though totally ignored by the controlled media, the “Spotlight” paper, of Nov 15, 1999 (p. 2), had a report on it.
“Spotlight” perceptively noted that prominent media people--like Peter Jennings, Dan Rather and Tom Brokaw--all totally ignored this Pleasanton, Texas shooting of three White policemen. Never once did these shootings receive any national publicity, despite the fact that the controlled media has been insane on reporting deaths by guns. And normally, the killing of a policeman is major news in the US.
Surely, of all the things which would be front page news and obsessions on the nightly boob tube, a shooting of three policemen would be it and especially since there has been an enormous outcry for gun laws and gun controls. As “Spotlight” asked, how is it or why it is that this Pleasanton, Texas case received no media scrutiny.
The Answer
Well, “Spotlight” answered its own question by merely printing a picture of the killer. He was a very black, Black man named Jeremiah Engleton.
Obviously, if Jeremiah would have been White, Jennings, Brokaw and Rather, plus “Newsweek” and “Time” magazines and so forth would have had major stories about the incident. The public would have been bombarded for weeks and weeks about it.
And if by chance, the killer was a White man who shot and killed three Black policemen, the US President and Congress would have had a major outcry. Slick Clinton would have dispatched an army of federal agents, prosecutors, investigators, etc to fully investigate the incident and ascertain the complete family history and background of the killer.
Furthermore, if the detailed and extensive investigation into the life and background of the killer revealed that he had ever had any contact with the Ku Klux Klan, the Aryans Nations or one of the Christian Identity groups, this contact would receive still more media hype. There would be new cries to crack down on the accused religion or faith of the man on the premise that it is an out of control cult.
This case would have been the crime of the decade and maybe century. If anything could bring on a new gun control law, such an incident would have done so. People in the controlled national media and in Washington would have whined, moaned and cried continuously until Congress finally acted.
Chapter 299--Media Hypocrites II
The Flint, Michigan School Shooting
One of the most extraordinary illustrations of media bias surfaced on Feb 29, 2000, when a small six year boy named Owens took a stolen, 32 caliber hand gun from his home and took it to school and shot and killed a small six year girl named Kayla Rolland. This story did receive a little publicity (perhaps because it was so incredible). But the story behind the story never came out.
Quite naturally, President Slick Clinton grabbed the available media sources to start his usual war on guns. He called for a summit meeting with Congressional leaders to discuss more gun control laws. He wanted trigger locks on guns, among other things.
“Newsweek” magazine of Mar 13, 2000 (p. 25-27), had a story on this incident (“Did Kayla Have to Die?”), which was a little revealing by reading between the lines. Quite naturally, neither “Newsweek,” Clinton or any other public figure or source really discussed the problem.
As is always true, these sources all began their routine war on guns. Of course, this was the gist of the “Newsweek” account of what happened in three articles. Besides the just mentioned murder story, “Newsweek” also offered up stories on “There is More We Can Do” and “Inside the Real Gun Battle” (which focused upon the evils of guns and how Clinton wanted more gun laws).
Please understand that these news reports from the national controlled media are written with a media bias and slant.
In other words, the controlled media didn’t just report the news, but the controlled media worked in a twist and slant and some yellow journalism to interpret the news. The controlled media (which is controlled by a handful of people) has an agenda (of their primary owners/controllers).
Details on the Boy
In the report on the shooting, “Newsweek” pointed out that the shooter’s father was in jail for burglary and drug use, and that his mother was sort of being with the boy to living in another nearby house. “Spotlight” had some remarks on the shooting in its Mar 13, 2000, issue (p. 2). “Spotlight” noted that the boy’s grandfather was also in jail.
The boy ostensibly lived with his uncle and another man named James (both of whom were allegedly crack-cocaine dealers). The house was a dirty, run down, crack-cocaine store (surely, with many cockroaches and all the rest of depravity imaginable).
Neighbors said that the parents were always cussing, fighting and drinking in the yard. There was reportedly such a steady stream of drug dealers in, out and near the place that police had to sometimes be called in to open a path for children to get to and from school. Truly, the boy lived in a dysfunctional family and home.
But the real story of what happened was accidentally allowed to surface when “Newsweek” made the mistake of including with its presentation several photographs of little Kayla, the shooter’s mother and father and the James man, who lived with the boy in the crack house and supplied the gun.
The murdered Kayla was a beautiful and innocent, little, White girl and the Owens boy, his father, his mother, his uncle and the man living with him (who had possession of the stolen gun) at the crack house were all Black Africans. This is pure and simply a story of racial integration and how the modern, corrupt, misinformed society has dealt with the race issue.
The story would end there and we still would not fully know what happened or really what the issue was. But “Newsweek” mistakenly quoted the boy’s father, Dedric Darnell Owens, who was in jail.
Per Dedric, the boy was always fighting (and apparently attacking) other (White?) children at school (like the one he jabbed with a pencil at school). Owens asked his son why he fought other kids? The boy replied-- “Because I hate them.”
The Hate Crime Scenario
Yet, no one would have the foggiest notion of what all was involved in this story from the media accounts--were it not for the fact that “Newsweek” mistakenly included the just noted pictures of the boy’s father, mother and friend at the crack house.
Without these photos, plus the wisdom of the boy’s father in telling about the boy’s hate, it would be impossible to ever put together the story that the controlled media never told.
Manifestly, what we have is a classic hate crime (according to the definition of the loving and compassionate liberals, humanists and Socialists--like with former President Slick).
First, there was the gender issue. The murderer was a male and the victim was a female. Surely, this point is significant in a hate and thought crime. Next, there was the racial issue--a Black murderer and a White victim.
Finally, the boy admitted his hate of people he fought with or opposed in school. It would be interesting to know if all of these persons the boy hated were White or were there other racial strains involved. If they were all White, then this really cinches the hate crime scenario.
But we’ll never know the background here because the controlled media will hide and cover-up all references to hate and race in this boy’s life.
More
In any case, no one said anything about the racial factor or the hate factor in the controlled media’s stories about this incident. The whole focus was upon the evils of guns and how something must be done in new laws to prevent another shooting like this one (never mind that no new gun laws could have stopped this shooting).
With this backdrop, let us imagine what Slick Clinton and the controlled national media (the hypocrites) would have done if the shooter was White and the victim was Black (coupled with the remark about the hate in the shooter’s mind and heart). Instead of just focusing upon guns, we would have had the classic hate crime of all. Slick would have been out demanding new hate crime laws (plus new gun control laws).
Though “Newsweek” made the mistake of including the photos and quoting the shooter’s father on the boy’s hate, the magazine tried to make it all up for the Africans by ameliorating the incident and supporting the innocent little boy (who will walk free and never face any of the punishment which he should face for this murder).
Upon police questioning of the boy, after the shooting, he explained that he and little Kayla had exchanged words the day before and that she slapped him (was he trying to get her in the sack for sex, as little Africans start copulating quite early?).
So, with this excuse, maybe the media can also put some of the blame on the little girl. After all, she had no right to slap him (if she, in fact, did slap him or was this a justifying lie?).
“Newsweek” then went on to support the boy by quoting the prosecutor who said that he didn’t think the shooter ever understood that pulling the trigger kills. The boy allegedly took it all in as something happening routinely on television. So maybe, some of the blame can be put on TV as well. Regardless, the bottom line is that the boy is not to be blamed for anything.
Another Paradox
Now, for a real paradox in media reporting, consider some statistics on crime. The “America’s Promise Newsletter” for July 1998 (p. 2) offered some recent data from a Black leader named Walter Williams. Williams reported that 93% of murdered Blacks were killed by other Blacks and that 89% of interracial murders involved Black perpetrators on Whites.
The Jul-Aug 1999 “America’s Promise Newsletter” (p. 5) was more explicit on this paradox and gave the actual numbers for 1991. For all violent, interracial crimes, White perpetrators on Blacks numbered 55,301 while Black attacks on Whites totaled 572,458 incidents.
These statistics will be examined in some detail shortly below. But there is a need to recognize this reality in connection with the Jasper, Texas killing, as was outlined in the preceding chapter.
Why is it that the media generally ignores and by-passes any discussion on the real world of truth? Yet, if a White person should commit a crime against a Black, it becomes a major news event--as the one from Texas. Obviously, the nation’s leaders and powers have an agenda with a sinister purpose in twisting, distorting and lying about reality.
More on Black Crime
The “Spotlight” weekly paper of Jul 19, 1999 (p. 6), had a story by Sam Francis on “Media Blacks Out Racial Story” which really came home with the reality of the modern, controlled media and its enormous hypocrisy.
Like the just cited Walter Williams, Francis reported that 90% (Williams gave it as 89%) of the 1.7 million annual, violent, interracial crimes committed in America involve Black criminals, committing crimes on Whites. This means that only some 10 or 11% of the violent, interracial crimes occur with Whites on Blacks.
And this conclusion is in the context that the African American population is only about 12-13% of the total US population. In other words, one in nine Americans is Black and they commit nine times more violent crimes on Whites than the majority Whites commit on Blacks.
This means that the probability of a Black committing a crime of violence against a White is 50 times greater than a White on a Black. Francis notes that for multiple-offender, interracial crimes with Blacks, the probability is something like 100 to 250 times greater that gang victims will be White.
The essence of Francis’ report was that the New Century Foundation worked up these statistics in a study which was released to the public, in connection with a press conference in 1999. Copies of the study were furnished to the major media sources--like Time magazine, National Public Radio, CBS News, the Associated Press, Knight-Ridder newspapers, the Washington Post and so forth.
The interesting thing about this event is that not a one of the media sources chose to print one word about the study or the press conference of New Century. It was a total, 100%, news black out. And this is extraordinary if anyone wants to believe that the American media is independent and tells the truth. In truth, the media is a controlled media which lies and regularly distorts the truth.
Going on, Francis quoted Morgan Reynolds, head of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis, who said that this is an issue which is ignored and will not be commented upon by White scholars in America. Such scholars report that they will only get into trouble if they mention these statistics.
The article noted that Americans supposedly live in a free country where all points of view can be heard; but actually, all points of view can be heard only if they don’t contradict the enforced orthodoxy.
Contrary views (which are politically incorrect) cannot be heard at all in America. They will be blacked out and stomped into the ground. Clearly, the controlled, national media is not about to allow the truth to be told about race and crime.
Another Statistic
The previously cited “America’s Promise Newsletter,” for July-August 1999 (p. 5), had one more fascinating statistic to share on the question of crime and guns. This source noted that in 1994, a firearm was present in only 12 percent of the violent crimes committed in the United States.
The writer of this America’s Promise article, Richard Kelly Hoskins, concluded that crime is a PEOPLE problem and NOT a hardware problem. Hoskins went on with his “people” assessment by reflecting upon some of the statistics cited above on the demographic aspect of violent crime.
He placed the people problem in the context that more than one-third of it is found in 13% of the population (yes, the problem is not with guns, but it is a people problem and particularly with the 13% of the population--the Blacks--who commit most of the crimes). Of course, without the Blacks and now the growing Colored Hispanic population, there would be no crime problem.
US Department of Justice Data
The previously quoted “Spotlight” paper of Aug 23, 1999 (p. 1), had a report by James P. Tucker Jr on “Federal Stats prove Who the Haters Are” that assessed the 1997 crime statistics from the US Department of Justice, the latest year of federal data (which gave the details, as reported above by Sam Francis).
The story focused upon some 1,883,000 cases of aggravated assault, attacks that would cause serious injury or death. Some 60% of all robberies were done by Blacks, while 57% of persons arrested for robbery were Blacks. The same proportions were reported in other classifications of aggravated assault.
In 1994, every 100,000 American Blacks committed 3,494 crimes against Whites. Of every 100,000 Whites, only 63 committed crimes against Blacks. Thus, the average Black is 55 times more likely to commit an aggravated assault upon a White than the average White upon a Black (as noted earlier, Sam Francis put the figure at 50 times greater for all violent crimes).
For gang violence, the typical Negro gang is 102 times more likely to attack a White person than the reverse. For robbery, the ratio is 277 times greater by Blacks on Whites than Whites on Blacks.
Black Crime on Whites and Not the Reverse
So while the media was all hyped up about the White men killing the Black man in Jasper, Texas, as cited in the previous chapter, substantially more Blacks were murdering and assaulting Whites; which, of course, will never be reported in the controlled media because Black crime on Whites does not serve the media’s agenda.
Otherwise, it is well to also note that all of this Black crime on Whites does not constitute hate crimes. This writer is unaware of any situation where a Black crime on a White person constituted a hate crime. It is only the few and rare White crimes against Blacks that are hate crimes, deserving of national reporting and attention.
The same reasoning applies to the evil Amalekite Jews who attack, persecute or oppress other Americans. Whatever an evil Amalekite does can never be classified as a hate crime.
For example, in mid December 2001, Jewish Defense League Chairman Irv Rubin and member Earl Krugel were arrested in California on charges that they planned to bomb a Muslim mosque and the offices of Arab American Congressman Darrell Issa (R-CA) on the basis that they were Arab Muslims.
Never once was there any suggestion that these conspiratorial plans involved hate. This writer does not have the follow-up on this case, but we can be sure that Earl will ultimately skate free or never face any troubling sentence (Irv would have beat the rap too, but he committed suicide while in jail). Can the reader envision what would happen to two White men who planned on bombing a synagogue or a Black Church?
In other words, the whole American society and culture are nothing but a bunch of deceitful, evil hypocrites on this subject. And this reality can be proven quickly by anyone who is able to look into the subject by going beyond the lies and distortions put out by the national, controlled media.
The disparity is so bad and obviously gross that leading American liberals have started an effort to strike the word race in all compilation of statistics on crime. In other words, the ruling pundits don’t want anything said about the Black crime on Whites.
If there is to be a focus, it will be media attention on the few cases where Whites attack Blacks. This type of an event will continue to receive front page media coverage, as in the Texas case.
Racial Profiling
Incidentally, the topic of racial profiling has been under discussion in the early 21st century.
The liberals and leftists ruling the US claim that the statistics which prove how bad Blacks are in committing most crimes constitute a form of racial profiling and must, accordingly, be stopped as it is allegedly discriminatory and evil to take note of how bad Negro crime is.
It is all right to report on White crime. It’s just Black crime statistics that must be hidden from the public’s eyes. Thus, whenever an occasional White person commits a crime, that fact can be blabbed from the tallest mountain. Whenever a Black commits a crime (which is the primary and usual source of crime), that fact must be hidden from the public’s view.
For years now, most policemen have correctly understood that Blacks commit most of the crime. Therefore, policemen on patrol have had a habit of carefully monitoring some crime prone Blacks (like young, Negro males).
This police action has also come under the condemnation by the ruling liberals who hate the idea that a wise policeman might scrutinize and watch young, Black, male thugs.
To demonstrate how far the leftist controlled establishment and media has went and is moving, the Apr 8, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 2) had a news report which noted that the US Justice Department ordered a study on so-called racial profiling by law enforcement officers in New Jersey and presumably across America.
This Justice Department study found that the reason that Black automobile drivers get stopped more often by police is because the Blacks more often are speeding. Since this revelation was not exactly what the racial amalgamation people were looking for, they took action to suppress the report and not release it to the public.
Naturally, the controlled media said nothing about the report and its suppression. Thus, the hypocrite controlled media became co-conspirators in the hiding of this study and its findings. Obviously, if “American Free Press” found about it, the controlled media people could also have found out about it and published the results (but they wouldn’t do so since the results were contrary to their agenda on race-mixing).
Incidentally, the controlled media has been so insane over this allegation of racial profiling that the issue has reached the ridiculous level.
The May 24, 2002, “The Week” (p. 5) had a news report that the Governor of Maryland, Parris Glendening, has imposed a moratorium on executions until a study is completed on whether the system is racially biased or not. As pointed out in a preceding chapter, the nine people on Maryland’s death row are Blacks and eight were convicted for killing Whites.
The reality of racial profiling will be addressed in more detail in later chapters. Suffice to say, the topic is one that the ruling liberals and the controlled media want to cry and whine about continuously.
More on the Warped, Liberal Mind
One more example of this Christian America hypocrisy surfaced in a news report on December 17, 1999, on disciplinary problems in US schools--apparently, as prompted by the Black, so-called “reverend,” Jesse Jackson’s recent appearance in Decatur, Illinois, trying to get the school officials to reverse themselves and reinstate some Black students who had been expelled for fighting.
The story said that there is a belief in Washington that American schools are far more likely to take disciplinary action against Black students than they are against White students. Accordingly, the US Department of Justice dispatched a host of FBI agents, federal provocateurs and so forth all over the nation to make investigations to try to prove this liberal ploy.
As noted in a previous chapter, the report noted the situation in Phoenix, Arizona where Blacks constitute 4% of the school population. Yet, they receive 21% of the school disciplinary actions. On the surface, one could easily accept the fact that Black students cause more disciplinary problems than White students; but no, not so, among the US liberal humanists.
In the Christian humanist mind (as prodded, directed and focused by evil Amalekite bankers/masters who hate the stupid, White goyim), the statistics suggest racial discrimination since Black students are disciplined more than Whites. No humanist can ever understand that maybe the Blacks commit more school crimes; thus, necessitating more disciplinary actions.
More Cases Never Mentioned in the Controlled Media
Contrariwise, there are other pathetic cases of media prejudice which are totally incomprehensible. For instance, the Jul-Aug 1999 “America’s Promise Newsletter” (p. 5) mentioned a recent incident in Alexandria, Louisiana where an 82 year old woman was stabbed to death by a band of roving Negroes who selected her “because she was White.”
This story received little or no media focus. There never were any outcries about racism or hate crimes when this old woman was murdered. Slick Clinton did not mobilize an army of FBI agents to go to Louisiana and investigate Black racism. The media and the public ignored it since it involved Black crime on Whites (which is a non-story).
Another sample surfaced on Oct 16, 1999, in the Charleston, SC area when a gang of twelve or more Black youths (ages 14 to 21) attacked two White men riding bicycles on a residential street--following a nearby, highschool, football game.
The Black animals stomped, kicked and beat the two men mercilessly--even using metal pipes on one man while he was down on the ground (Nov 1-7, 1999, “Washington Times,” p. 18). This man, while down, was beaten into an unconscious coma.
The attackers were just beginning to concentrate on the second man when a woman nearby opened her door and yelled at the attackers that she was calling the police. When arrested, one of the Negroes used the race card to claim that the attack was prompted by one of the White men who allegedly used “racial slurs” (per the words of the Black animal)
Police said the Blacks apparently attacked to steal the bicycles, although race or something else could have been the motive for the attack. Fights and trouble had erupted after the football game which may have hyped up the Africans. The importance of this story is that it, like thousands of others, was totally ignored and lost in the controlled national media. Black crime on Whites is just not reported.
More Neglected Stories
A report in the Nov 1999 “Internet Vortex” (p. 30) noted that a gang of five Asians brutally raped a White teenage girl, as a part of their gang initiation. They admitted to police that they chose her because she was White.
Yet, this incident was not a hate crime. Of course, it was a no-news case in the national media. But imagine what would have happened in the media if five White boys had raped an Asian girl?
This same “Internet Vortex” (p. 30) had one more illustration of the gross, prevailing. media hypocrisy in America. This case concerned a Colored Filipino immigrant who took a handgun and went upstairs in his apartment building and shot and killed two innocent neighbors. This incident received no mention in the media. If the killer was a White man, it would have been major news all over the newspapers and boob tubes.
In December 1999, a gang of roving Negro animals in Pittsburgh attacked a pair of White kids. The Blacks beat both of them to death in an obvious frenzy of hate (as discussed on the “Michael Reagan Radio Talk Show” on Dec 22, 1999). Like so many other cases, this one was utterly blanked out by the controlled media. What would have happened if a White gang killed two Black children?
Another story occurred in Wilkinsburg, Pennsylvania (a suburb near Pittsburgh), on March 1, 2000, when a Black man named Ronald Taylor took a gun and killed two White persons and seriously injured three other Whites at two fast food restaurants. As he gunned down the Whites, Taylor said that “You’re all White trash, racist pigs” (Mar-Apr 2000 “America’s Promise” newsletter, p. 2).
Taylor tried to hide from police in the home of a Black woman. He told her that he was not going to kill any Blacks and that he was out to kill Whites only. Manifestly, Taylor’s targets were selected precisely because they were White. Of course, this case could not involve a hate crime since the perpetrator was a Negro. And importantly, there was no media or political outcry over hate in this incident.
On March 16, 2000, two White Sheriff’s deputies tried to serve a warrant on H. Rap Brown, the former Black Panther leader. Brown shot and seriously wounded the two deputies--one died. Despite all of the hate associated with the Black Panthers and H. Rap, this crime was not a hate crime and it was never characterized that way.
The April 15, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 2) offered a news item of nine Blacks beating White University of Virginia students in Charlottesville precisely because they were White. The Commonwealth’s attorney said that he lacked evidence of hate in the crimes. Of course, stories liked this one never saw the light of day in the national controlled media.
As always, hate crimes only involve White males, who act against women, queers, Blacks, Hispanics and Asians. And as always true, Black crime on Whites is quickly forgotten in the US media.
Since Black crime on White people is not on the agenda of the controlled national media, incidents, like the above samples, are either not reported or only briefly mentioned and quickly forgotten in the controlled media.
The Jake Robel Case
The Mar-Apr 2000 “America’s Promise” newsletter (p. 1) told the story of six-year old Jake Robel of Blue Springs, Missouri. Recently, he and his mother Christi were in Independence, Missouri shopping. Christi went into a sandwich store momentarily and left Jake in the family car, still strapped down with the Missouri required seat belts.
While Christi was in the store, a car jacker jumped into the car, started the engine and prepared to leave. Seeing little Jake, he opened the door and shoved the boy outside the car, while the boy was still entrapped in the seat belt. The mother saw what was happening and rushed to the car to try to free the boy from the tangled seat belt.
The car jacker poured the gas to the car and it took off and soon reached a speed of 80 miles an hour. Little Jake was outside the car and still hooked up to the seat belt as Christi tried to free him. The boy was killed as he was dragged on the pavement for five miles.
In many ways, this Missouri case had m