EZEKIEL
and YHWH’s
Judgment
for the
Good News
PEOPLE
VOLUME XXI
Christian Sociology
EZEKIEL and YHWH’s
Judgment for the
Good News People
Volume XXI--Christian Sociology
by
an unworthy servant
And you shall know the truth,
and the truth will make you free.
(John 8:32)
Common Law Copyright, 2003 & 2005 CE, an unworthy servant, Calder, Idaho. The author claims his Right of exclusive ownership and control of this publication, the fruit of his labor, as a matter of Intellectual Property protected by the Laws of YHWH and as guaranteed by the US Constitution for the United States. Permission is granted to quote provided appropriate credit is cited together with the Publisher’s web site name and postal mailing address––WWW.AgeEnd.Com PO Box 473, Calder, ID 83808, USA.
Contents
Volume XXI--Christian Sociology
CHAPTER PAGE
- Cover Page 1
- Title Page 2
- Contents 3
- Publisher’s Preface 5
Part MMM--Humanistic Problems
313 Christian Humanism and Feminism 6
314 Christian Humanism and Race I 12
315 Christian Humanism and Race II 23
316 Christian Humanism and Race III 28
317 Christian Humanism and Race IV 41
318 Christian Humanism and Race V 51
Part NNN--Humanistic Sodomy
319 Christian Humanism and Sodomy I 62
320 Christian Humanism and Sodomy II 69
321 A Sodomite President 83
322 Christian Acceptance of Sodomy 91
323 More Sodomy from Christian America 99
Part OOO--Children
324 Christian Humanism and Children I 112
325 Christian Humanism and Children II 119
326 Christian Humanism and Children III 131
327 Christian Humanism and Children IV 147
328 Christian Humanism and Children V 158
SHEERIT YISRAEL
PO Box 473
Calder, Idaho 83808, USA
Publisher’s Preface
Greetings! The following presentation is volume twenty-one of a 36-volume production of some 6,000 pages on “Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good News People,” all of which is on the Internet at the www.AgeEnd.com web site.
This overall effort provides an interpretation of the Good News message in the New Testament, its linkage to the book of Ezekiel, and an application of both to the age-end prophecies relating to certain nations and peoples now out in the world. In order for this single volume to be understood and comprehended, it is imperative that the study be read from its beginning--from page one of volume one.
Anyone trying to read this volume or the study’s 6,000 pages at any mid-point will end up in a state of confusion without having read and digested the preceding material. It is crucially important that this work be read in sequence from its beginning--otherwise, the reader will almost certainly end up missing the essence of the message!
The effort was originally set on a Macintosh computer with Microsoft Word 6.0.1. It was set in Helvetica, 12-point type (18 pt on chapter headings); single line spacings; and margins: left 1.2”, right 0.8”, top 0.7”, bottom 0.8” and footer 0.6” (for page numbers).
For further information on obtaining this study in 18 computer floppy disks (IBM-formatted, high density, 2HD, 1.44 MB, 3 1/2 inches); in a single CD-Rom; or in hard copies (when the Internet or a compatible computer is not available); please write the publisher at the above address and send a stamped, self-addressed, long (legal-size), return envelope.
With a CD-Rom or computer floppy disks, the study is readable on Macintosh (systems 5.0 and later) or IBM/compatible (with Microsoft Word-Windows) personal computers. May The Great CREATOR and SOVEREIGN OF THE UNIVERSE bless you as you study His word to learn His will and to obey Him. Shalom (peace) to you and yours!
an unworthy servant, Hanukkah 2003 CE
Chapter 313--Christian Humanism and Feminism
Some History
The die for what has happened here in the age end on women was actually cast as early as the summer of 1847 in the United States. That summer, a group of men and women assembled for a convention at Seneca Falls, New York. On July 19th and 20th of that year, some 68 women and 32 men in the group signed a “Declaration of Principles.”
The statement said: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men and women are created equal... The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations on the part of man toward woman, having a direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her.”
By 1920, the US had guaranteed voting rights for all women in a constitutional amendment. Surely, the American establishment has changed dramatically for the worse since those days.
The Women’s Feminist Movement
Thus, in the new modern way of looking at things, women have supposedly been oppressed and discriminated against for long centuries in the White-male (specifically the WASP, White-Anglo-Saxon-Protestant male), dominated culture. Per this modern liberal view, women are no longer supposed to be at the home having babies and caring for the children and home.
No! All of a sudden, women are exactly the same as men (but are they? The proponents of this nonsense are incredibly stupid and diabolically deranged). Being the equal of men, women must now be eligible to hold the same jobs and do the same things as men. There can be no distinction between the sexes in the modern USA (hence, US Naval warships have become floating whorehouses).
The Fall-Out
Of course, only an idiot can’t tell what has happened in the United States since the feminist movement has attained success. This nation is experiencing an explosion in broken homes, divorces, unhappiness, suicides, and numbers of unwanted and/or illegitimate children, who at most may only have one parent, usually the mother, beyond other sad manifestations, to be shortly broached.
The popular TV talk show host Oprah Winfrey endorses and promotes a book club which focuses upon emotional issues of interest to women (Jul 27, 2001, “The Week,” p. 10). The 43 books sold so far reflect a world where the men lie, cheat and kill; the women are suicidal alcoholics and adulterers; and the children are unloved, abused and kidnapped. Yes, this is what the modern feminist movement has produced.
The Mar-Apr 2001 “Philadelphia Trumpet” (p. 21) gave these statistics: Some 45% of new marriages will end in divorce; 68% of remarriages will end in divorce; 40% of married adults have been divorced; 25% of all adults have parents who have been divorced; and over one million children each year see their parents divorce.
In terms of all marriages, currently, the overall divorce rate is now 63% (per the Dec 28, 2001, “Jerusalem Post,” p. 15). Manifestly, the modern feminist movement and ideology have not been good. Truly, they have been disasters for women.
In the permissive, welfare, give away state, the broken homes and unwed mothers are supposedly not much of a problem (since the government steps in and gives them monthly checks and welfare aid of all sorts). Of course, the welfare program only helps to encourage more and more divorces, broken homes and illegitimate babies.
Also, of great concern, girls used to be sugar and spice and everything nice. But no longer, under the new feminism. All of a sudden, there has developed “problem girls,” who will grow up to look like butches and be tough as nails.
“US News & World Report” of May 14, 2001 (p. 10), had an array of percentage changes in various levels of crime and violence from 1990 to 1999 by gender for children under age 18.
In all categories (drug abuse, curfew and loitering, assault, weapons and vandalism), the increases were substantially higher for girls than boys. The overall arrest rate for girls in 1990 went from 70 per 100,000 up to 122 per 100,000 in 1999. Of the 150,700 arrests for juveniles running away, some 59% were girls. Of the total 2.47 million juvenile arrests in 1999, some 27.2% were of girls (up from 22.7% in 1990).
Working Women
In the current sun worship culture, all kinds of women have to enter the work-force to help the family with income to survive. Actually, this is wrong. All women should have men in some capacity in their lives to provide, protect and support them with love, care and concern. In the case of married women, they are furthermore due their conjugal rights, per YHWH’s Torah.
Thus, women should not be in the work-force beyond those situations where they are alone and have no man to provide for them. Obviously, some have to work to live. And for those women working, they should be fairly paid and treated vis-à-vis men. Working women should not be adversely discriminated against.
They should be recognized as the weaker sex and accordingly so treated. The Scriptural reality of gender separation has been established in prior chapters. There is no need to repeat it here. Suffice to say, it is Scriptural for women to be separated from men and to fulfill their role in life in being a helpmate to men and the mother of children. This is a good thing.
Conversely, there is a great tragedy in some circles (among almost all Colored peoples, and tragically even among so-called Whites who have heavy Colored genes). Negroes and White people with evident Black genes are particularly abusive and oppressive with their women.
Of course, this condition is wrong and represents sin. As it has been described at length in previous chapters on culture, nothing further needs to be said here.
Suffice to say, women historically (at least, in Caucasian lands, and among Caucasian peoples) were never treated as equals or just one of the boys. They should be (and used to be) treated better than one of the boys. But all that has changed in modern America. Today’s woman is one of the boys.
Upon divorce (which comes regularly and often in today’s culture), women should receive alimony and financial support if they are illegally divorced (by their husbands) without a proper Scriptural cause. In olden days, men could expect to pay alimony and “wife support” upon divorce. Now, women are on their own and receive nothing. Too often, they must work to survive.
More “Progress” by Women
A very pathetic report from the US military surfaced in the fall of 2000 when the Navy reported that it was going to spend $561 million to convert the urinals on Navy warships to gender neutral commodes to accommodate the women on board. Some 3,000 of them are to be changed at a cost of $187,000 each (Nov 20, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 2). Is this insanity or what?
But there are still more crazy US maneuvers. Periodically, television cameras pick up on some small, frail, woman, American soldier loaded down with a big gun and heavy military gear headed around the world for deployment in a foreign nation. Even locally, other, frail, weak women are shown as police officers, carrying guns, which they can hardly lift or carry around, much less use in a real emergency.
These pictures (and their realities) are just too ridiculous to be true. Yet, they are true. Only a fool will depend on most of these military and police women in an emergency. They are badly out of their YHWH created roles and totally incapable of providing any defense to this nation when it is ultimately judged by The HIGHEST for its sins. Like Yechezkel wrote--when this nation is attacked, no one goes out to fight (Ezek 7:14).
Manifestly, it is absolutely ludicrous for modern Americans to be choosing to send their young women all over the world, carrying guns and personal effects that they can barely lift, much less carry into battle and use.
The whole stupidity of this ridiculous exercise over feminism in the military brings to mind some fascinating observations by J. R. Nyquist, in his book “Origins of the 4th World War” (p. 74), on the wisdom (or rather stupidity) of the Aleksandr Kerensky provisional government in Russia in 1917 (when the Czar was forced out).
As Nyquist tells it, Kerensky organized a women’s battalion of 300 women soldiers to supposedly prop him and his government up. On the night of the Bolshevik coup, this battalion of women launched a supposed counter-attack. When the battle was over, the 300 women force was gone. They all had been captured, raped and/or plundered.
More Insanity
Now, that society has went insane over women’s rights and the feminist movement, there has been an enormous push for women to enter into all kinds of competitive sports. It isn’t only that women are competing against other women, but the push has been on for women to compete with men in rough, contact sports.
Already, there are any number of professional women wrestlers and boxers. While these have usually involved women against women, there is a move afoot to cast women against men in some instances.
Football is one of the classic illustrations of women wanting to play with men. Any number of females have come out and tried to get on the men’s teams, although it would be an utter disaster for women to compete with men in such activities.
The fall of 2000 saw a woman named Heather Mercer try out as a place kicker for the Duke University football team. She and four other place kickers were later cut from the team’s roster for not having the necessary skills. She sued the school in court, claiming gender discrimination.
At the trial, the coach and several players all testified that she did not have the kicking and playing skills needed to make the team. Notwithstanding this critical reality of her qualifications, she won her suit in court and was awarded a judgment of $2 million in punitive damages (Nov 12, 2000, “Spotlight,” p. 23). Obviously, America has reached the sick point on this whole theme.
Otherwise, one of the prime reasons why so many married women have to work is because the American sun worship tax structure is so high for all people, except the very rich (as described elsewhere herein). With taxes at the 60% level for the typical American, wives have to leave home and enter the work-force.
Taxes have been steadily going up ever since Roosevelt came to power back in the 1930s. The upward spiral only continues with no let-up in sight (as discussed in former chapters). The point is that the present sun worship taxation system necessitates that both husbands and wives work.
The essence of this is that women should not be in the work-force, except in unusual situations. In general, they should have a man to take care of them which will allow them to be at home taking care of the children and home. In a word, they should be publicly “separated” from men as much as possible, as discussed in a former chapter.
The Paula Jones Case
A later chapter will elaborate upon the Paula Jones lawsuit against former President Slick Clinton and how this poor woman from a trailer park was shuffled around by the United States court system. As late as April 1998, the local Arkansas Judge Susan Wright threw the case out of court.
In her decision, Wright said that assuming the facts were all true, as alleged by Jones, the case would still not constitute sexual harassment, although she did allow that perhaps Slick could have been sued or tried in court for assault if Jones and/or the state would have chosen that course. However, this option was out since the statute of limitations had expired.
The point of this affair is that the women’s lib movement supported Slick all the way throughout this litigation. The hypocritical women’s motion never gave any support to Jones--apparently because she was a poor woman from a trailer park, rather than being an elite feminist from the Ivy League and/or the Eastern establishment.
Now that Judge Susan Wright joined in with Bill to effectively deny Paula Jones her day in court, it spelled an absolute disgrace and sick condition in the United States when a poor woman who works as a state employee can be accosted, harassed and intimidated by the Governor of that state and have no recourse at law.
This means that male supervisors at all levels can now sexually abuse, hurt, intimidate and harass innocent women under their supervision and control; and at least, by Judge Wright’s decision, nothing will be done about it. The stupid and ridiculous women’s movement (under Amalekite leadership) suffered a major setback in Wright’s decision.
A Final Word on Feminism
Historically, in America, and indeed around the world, certain things have historically been referred to in the feminine gender. Nations, corporations and organizations of various types are referred to as she or her. Even in the Scriptures, nations and religious bodies are mentioned in the feminine gender.
Thus, all kinds of things are referred to with female references and/or female names. For example, hurricanes and typhoons have historically been given the names of women. Ships at sea and airplanes have routinely been given female names (like the famous Enola Gay that flew off of Tinian Island in the Pacific to drop the first atomic bomb on Japan in 1945).
But all this has been changing--sometimes slowly, but nevertheless deliberately. The last several years have seen global weather people start using both male and female names for hurricanes and typhoons. The latest fad is that the shipping industry is ending centuries of tradition to start referring to ships as “it” instead of “her” (Apr 8, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 2).
Chapter 314--Christian Humanism and Race I
Racial Integration and Free Sex
Racial integration and amalgamation are some of the backbone philosophies of Christian humanists which have gained widespread social acceptance throughout the United States during the past 70 years. The humanists really suppose that all humans/humanoids, of whatever kind or type, descend from Adam and Eve; and that there is a “brotherhood” of all of these different humans/humanoids.
As commented upon elsewhere in this study, this brotherhood of man concept comes from the old sun worship cults where most of them preached it. It was particularly important among the Chrishna and other Eastern sun worshippers, who have played such an enormous role in the formation and development of Christian theology.
The basis for this Christian thinking was well put by Dr Burton L. Mack when he suggested that Christians have seen themselves as a social construct. Often, they have believed that they constitute a congregation, a household, a family, a nation, a temple, a city or a kingdom (“Who Wrote the New Testament? The Making of a Christian Myth,” p. 12).
Christian denominationalism and division, since the surfacing of the Protestant Reformation, have altered this thinking somewhat. While many denominations would never see themselves in a family with collective Christianity, they can and often do relate to that definition for their own individual groups. And they relate to it in the context that all members are automatically in the brotherhood.
Thus, this concept of a brotherhood of man is pretty prevalent throughout Christian America, as proven by persons like Sydney Cleveland, editor of the Sabbath Sentinel (mentioned earlier), and the secularist Vice President Al Gore (supposedly a Christian) who referred to a brotherhood and sisterhood of Americans at a meeting of the freedom of choice (abortion) people on January 22, 1997 (evidently in Washington, DC).
The Christian Attitude
This sun worship thinking has been well prevalent in almost all of Christendom--clearly from its very beginnings (even in the Old South, in its days of slavery and racial segregation).
Perhaps the best statement of this was made by the World Council of Churches when it adopted a miscegenation and amalgamation resolution at its second Assembly in 1954 at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois.
Their resolution declared that “Segregation on the grounds of race, colour or ethnical origin in all forms is in conflict with the Gospel and must be regarded as irreconcilable with Christian teaching about man and the essence of the Church of Christ... There can be no objection in principle to intermarriage... No state has the right to prohibit mixed marriages.”
Not wishing to be left out of this modern insanity over racial integration and the destruction of The ELOHIM created, separate races, the National Council of Churches adopted a sun worship creed which proclaims-- “One God and Father, One Race of Men Within the Church.”
School Desegregation
In an article on “The Unity of the Church,” appearing in “Essays on Segregation,” Dr George M. Brydon noted that “the opinion rendered by the Supreme Court in May 1954 seems to have introduced into the thinking of Christian America “a new thought which has gone racing into many sections of our country.
“It has developed into almost a new item to be placed in the creeds of all churches that the Divine plan is to merge all races of men into one race.”
Of course, this May 1954 decision was the famous one in Brown versus the Board of Education which declared school segregation illegal in the United States, despite the fact that the 10th amendment to the US Constitution clearly left such questions to the individual states and earlier Supreme Court decisions had recognized this condition.
So the court began a process of re-writing the Constitution, on its own terms, by judicial interpretation. One of the interesting things about this judicial interpretation (to change the US Constitution) is that it demonstrates the limitations, fallacies and shortcomings of human laws as opposed to The ELOHIM’s laws.
Human laws change regularly at the whim of evil men while YHWH’s laws never change. Not only did the court declare racial segregation in the public schools illegal, but later courts and governing administrations forced this concept on all private schools as well (mainly, by manipulating the tax code to force racial integration and miscegenation on them).
Not content with the change in laws, the courts went to work to impose the bussing of children all over large areas to also achieve “racial mixing.” This stupidity has not only wrecked the schools, it has been a disaster for the students. Now, children have to spend hours every day on school buses to be sure that they get “integrated” (and may develop cancer from diesel fumes from the buses, per news reports on Feb 12, 2001).
While there have been a host of horrible social fall-outs over school desegregation, one of the most profound, deleterious effects has been the dumbing down of American education (which a few Americans are now beginning to take note of).
It looks like ignorant, sun worshipping liberals would be able to put two and two together and realize that the decline in American education started primarily in the 1950s with racial integration of the schools. But they never understand. More will be said on this theme in later remarks.
Mother Sardis, Revisited
Of course, collective Christianity is now on this sun worshipping bandwagon which is trying to promote and encourage racial amalgamation at every opportunity. A good illustration of this insanity was demonstrated in the “Bible Advocate,” church magazine of the Church of God (Seventh Day), mother church of the entire, lethargic, Sardis movement, previously mentioned (Rev 3:1-6).
This mother Sardis group (historically a White church) now has a Black president (evidently under an affirmative action program). One of her other leading Negro ministers is reportedly married to a White woman.
Of course, the (former) editor of this miscegenated mess (Roy A. Marrs) got on board to do his part in attempting to destroy the separate races which were created as “good” by The MOST HIGH.
It seems that this Sardis magazine for May 1997 published a story (“Prayer for a Mother”) about a single, White woman (referred to as a lady) who gave birth to a Negro baby--out of wedlock. Quite naturally, there was never a hint or suggestion of anything wrong over this situation in the printed article.
One Spokane, Washington reader of the story was disturbed with the way it was handled editorially and wrote a letter to the editor, suggesting that the tone of the article was that mongrelization was good, and that the woman was held up as a moral lady (thus, a role model of sorts; when, in fact, she was a cheap, White whore).
The Sep 1997 “Bible Advocate” published the short one paragraph reader’s letter, along with an “Editor’s Note” which proceeded to attack the reader (with eight paragraphs of comment) for attitude and unwarranted judgments (effectively, for daring to write in).
The Sardis editor didn’t dispute that she might have been a whore or that mixed race “marriages” might be Scripturally wrong (Marrs did write marriages and not illicit sex). Instead, he tried to say that the article was “neutral” on those points, but did argue that the woman was a good woman since she did not abort the mongrel child.
Going on, Marrs attacked the reader for judgments which he allegedly didn’t have any proof on--such as she being a whore, while it was possible that she became pregnant through some innocent action, accident or mistake (the rebellious justification for fornication and pregnancy by many unwed mothers).
As Editor Marrs tried to argue, the article teaches “compassion,” the need to assume good things about people and to pray for sinners (but as noted earlier, YHWH wants repentance first and then prayer). The editor’s bottom line was that he had no reason to apologize for printing the article. In other words, everything was handled perfectly by his church, despite his uncertainty over whether miscegenation is right or wrong.
The Liberal Approach
Marrs followed the established liberal and humanist positions of essentially avoiding the facts; and instead, concentrating upon the person making the complaint. As always, liberals will not deal with the facts (because of being under demonic powers and influence), but will divert attention to personalities by attempting to ridicule and demean anyone who questions their actions on the basis of fact and logic.
As elsewhere commented upon beforetime, it is virtually impossible to intellectually have dialogue with liberals when they will not deal with logic, facts and evident truth. Inevitably, they want to immediately shift any argument away from truth and reality and focus it upon personalities. They especially direct their attacks upon anyone who questions their actions or beliefs.
As a follow-up, after printing the above exchange, the Sardis people at Denver received other pro and con reader’s letters on the issue. They printed a couple of them in their December 1997 magazine. One dead, Sardis writer wrote that “I believe that interracial marriage is appropriate” in the eyes of “God,” more than interfaith marriage (Dec 1997 “Bible Advocate,” p. 16).
Another dead, Sardis respondent suggested that after “Christ,” the church was united across language, national and ethnic lines and that “God” is pleased to see His children marry across racial lines (ibid, p. 16). This one also cited Timothy as being the son of a mixed-race marriage (never understanding that Timothy’s Jew-Greek ancestry, assuredly focused on religion and not race at all).
Editor Marrs, to his credit, did mention Deuteronomy 22:9-11, in defense of how he had handled the original question. Nevertheless, this resurfacing of the question proves that many Sardis believers are as hoodwinked and Scripturally uninformed as the rest of the American, sun worshipping population.
Of course, this event and the way mother Sardis handled it is a classic illustration of the depravity and sickness in traditional, sun worshipping Christianity which this Sardis church is a part of (they may keep the Sabbath; but otherwise, most of the Sardis doctrines and beliefs are basically sun worship--just as is true with the rest of Christendom).
Accuse the Accuser
This tragic and sickening action by a sick, warped, sun worship church in a sun worship culture is important to review and think about because it demonstrates the pathetic state that modern Christianity and the American culture have deteriorated into.
If a person tries to raise a legitimate question about such an obviously controversial article, then the editor merely turns the focus from the article to the reader who would dare write in to complain. That’s the way the liberals and Christian humanists operate. Anyone writing a contrary letter to a liberal editor can normally expect to receive a personal attack, if not to be just ignored.
Former President Slick Clinton has been following this modis operandi ever since he entered politics. Let someone complain publicly or in print over how Slick had abused and misused his office or over how immoral, crooked and dishonest he had been, and the White House reaction was not to deny the charges. Instead, it attacked the person speaking out (accuse the accuser).
Some years ago, in government service, this writer fired a worthless lawyer (who was an evident Amalekite, although i did not know it at the time). He immediately sued me for discrimination, claiming that he was fired because of him being a Jew. From his viewpoint, any disciplinary actions against him would be because of racial and religious discrimination and not because of his job performance.
Instead of a focus being made upon his work and duties which prompted the dismissal, he turned the issue around to focus upon me. In other words, his conduct became a non-issue and my conduct became the total question in court. The point of this is that it has become virtually impossible to impose any disciplinary standards upon Blacks, Jews and other so called minorities today in the US.
More Sardis Depravity
Early 1998 saw former President Slick Clinton announce a Presidential Commission on Diversity which seemed to be a project of doing nothing, but giving Clinton and his political cronies a forum to publicize their great concern and compassion over Colored Americans and the desire to achieve more and more cultural and racial integration and amalgamation, contrary to the wishes of most people of all races.
Seeing this stupid motion underway, the Black President of the Church of God (Seventh Day) followed up with his own scheme of diversity for the old, mother, Sardis church--built, financed, funded, supported, motivated and directed largely by ignorant White Americans over the last 145 years.
This new Sardis leader launched his own “President’s Commission on Diversity,” as announced in the “Bible Advocate” for July-August 1998 (p. 19). The Sardis leadership is committed to the task of ministry to all peoples and races in the context of diversity (just like the historic sun worshippers have traditionally done).
The new commission will devise a statement expressing the church’s commitment to diversity; design a plan for diversity training, awareness, and development throughout the church; and help ensure that the ministries, priorities, and programs of the conference reflect diversity.
This new Sardis commission of ten people (headed up by a woman) is clearly diversified--at least, in accordance with affirmative action concepts. It consists of three Hispanic males and one Hispanic female, one Black male and one Black female, one possibly White male and three possibly White females. The word “possibly” has been used because one can never be sure about White people.
Often, reported Whites are Amalekites, posing as White majority types. As a minimum, the one White male would likely be a liberal leftist who would sell his own race and kind out for nothing. The three supposed White women are surely feminists who are in absolute rebellion against their YHWH ordained roles of silence, humility and submission.
More Multi-Culturalism and Integration
The Jul-Aug 2000 “Bible Advocate” followed the precedent established in prior issues with a new blast promoting and encouraging multi-culturalism and racial amalgamation. This issue was led by a “Love and Let Love” theme. The front cover had a photo of a supposedly White man “rapping” or dialoging with some tall Black teenagers (with sunglasses, necklaces and baseball caps on backward).
Presumably, the alleged White man was a Christian of some sort (though he did have a very pronounced Hittite nose) who might have been supposedly reaching out for interracial harmony and contact with the Black youths (who appeared to be rappers).
An interior Christian love and relationship article had a picture of a woman with her arms wrapped around a very definite Negro man (Jul-Aug 2000 “Bible Advocate,” p. 8). Though the article was on marriage, the woman had no wedding band. So maybe, they were not supposed to be husband and wife (just lovers).
While some would suppose that her dark complexion and long black hair meant that she had African genes, the true was that she appeared to be very European in bone structure and appearance. Thus, she could well have been a Southern European from Italy, Spain, Portugal or Greece or otherwise a Middle Easterner of some sort. Clearly, this photo of her hugging a very Negro man sent the wrong message.
Another article on Christian love (ibid, p. 12-13) also had a photo which sent bad vibes to impressionable young children. This one was of a reasonably dark teenage boy (who appeared to be a Mexican or Hispanic). He too had a teenage girl with her arms wrapped around him (from behind) and wearing no wedding ring. But she was very white in color, compared with his dark skin and Hispanic genetic features.
Apparently, the “Bible Advocate” bought these photographs from some agency and merely used them in the magazine to supposedly prove Christian love.
The only problem with the choice of photos is that all three failed on the love angle. And instead, they promoted multi-culturalism and promiscuous, interracial sex and miscegenation. They were very poor examples of things to be shown to innocent, gullible, White children.
Something Missing
The only thing missing from the Bible Advocate articles about the Sardis efforts in trying to create an interracial and multi-cultural organization is how many of these dead, Sardis people are Pentecostal Holy Rollers who could liven up their interracial meetings and contacts with some wild fanaticism.
Although the article didn’t say, the truth is that historic Sardis has been opposed to this demonism on occasion. However, having never effectively dealt with the problem, the motion has surfaced from time to time in Sardis churches.
It’s easy to say that this unique new Sardis thinking on racial diversity/multi-racialism (which, by the way, is absolutely and totally unscriptural) will accomplish nothing for Whites. It will be more humanism and amalgamation of the races to further destroy the White majority that financed, worked and built this rebellious, Sardis church.
Since this wicked, sun worship, Sardis group is so pathetic and so blatant in its sun worship practices, maybe it should be destroyed. In any case, she likely will soon crumble from her own weight because of her insistence on violating the Words of YHWH.
At the moment, the self destruction process seems to be the path now being followed by mother Sardis, as she integrates and miscegenates herself into oblivion. The Jun 2003 “Bible Advocate” (p. 19) showed the modern success of Sardis in a photo of a pretty, young, White girl seated next to a Black boy in attendance at a church, youth rally on Apr 12-13, 2003, in Conroe, Texas.
This apparent teen-age couple were wearing similar T-shirts and seemed to be smiling and enjoying themselves at the interracial meeting going on in Texas. It is stupid moves like this insanity which will manifestly end mother Sardis. And because of her gross sins and wickedness, mother Sardis should end. The world will be better off without her influence.
Please be assured that if this wicked, Sardis Church does not self destruct in the present mode, her day is certainly coming when The ELOHIM will intervene to destroy this sick and lacking institution. Manifestly, as more and more Coloreds integrate and miscegenate, this group will reach a point of being useless for any good purpose. Self destruction seems inevitable. YHWH’s justice sometimes works out in strange ways.
A Classic
Incidentally, in mentioning the efforts of mother Sardis to destroy herself, it should be noted that she has an internal Hispanic group which had a “Texas Hispanic Convocation” in Texas in Nov 2002 (Jan-Feb 2003 “Bible Advocate,” p. 17). Can anyone perceive the uproar if the Whites in Texas had held a White people convocation? An absolute crisis would have resulted. Truly, it is a hypocrite world!
A Final Note on Sardis Depravity
While it would seem that mother Sardis has hit the bottom of the barrel on depravity, there was more to come which must be highlighted. The Sardis Black President had a “President’s message” in the Oct 1999 “Bible Advocate” (p. 18). This one was entitled “The Tale of Two Crosses.”
In the article, the Sardis leader said that the cross was the core of Christianity and was central to the Gospel. He then called the Sardis people to a “radical commitment to the cross.” He challenged Sardis believers to unwrap it, embrace it and raise it high for all the world to see. He concluded by saying that the “cross of Christ” offers life.
Of course, this is typical Christian nonsense from people who simply don’t know what the Book is all about. Its significance, however, is in the fact that vast numbers of Sardis people have correctly understood the evils of the Christian cross over the years. Historically, Sardis writings did not seem to come out in favor of this pagan symbol of sun worship, as their president advanced in the Oct 1999 magazine.
In any case, the article prompted a reader’s letter who took exception to the church’s advocacy of the Christian cross. And naturally, the editor (Calvin Burrell) defended his leader in the Mar 2000 issue on readers’ letters (Oct 1999 “Bible Advocate,” p. 17). He argued that the cross was an appropriate symbol for Christians--like other Christian symbols (dove, light, trumpet, tables of stone, pictures, etc).
The point in bringing up this issue on the cross is not to single out the Church of God (Seventh Day) for paying homage and support to the pagan cross symbol of ancient sun worship (as is proven in this study at hand). The issue is a bigger one because it demonstrates the level of depravity and wickedness in the mother, Sardis definition.
Sardis, like the rest of Christianity, has grown more wicked and has departed even more from YHWH’s truth over the years. Because there is so much depravity and wretchedness in this sick organization, judgment will soon strike hard on her when it strikes Christian America.
The Effect of Christian Thinking on Race, Revisited
Consequently, being ignorant of what the Scriptures really say, the humanists (secular and Christian) are rushing in to completely destroy all of the separate races and bring about a society of one race (which has been an objective of the Devil for 6,000 years with the hoped for destruction of Adam, who was made in YHWH’s image--not the behemah or chaiyah--see Gen 1:27; 6:1-9; 11:1-9).
It is quite obvious that the entire concept of racial integration and amalgamation is at serious odds with YHWH’s Torah (as discussed earlier) and the whole meaning of the Hebrew word kodesh (also mentioned earlier). The Hebrew kodesh means separate, set apart and separation (yes, segregation); and its focus is partly on racial considerations (for reasons described earlier).
Therefore, the rebellious humanists were among the first to work on a social plane to end all laws prohibiting miscegenation (yes, almost all US states had such laws until they were declared unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court a few years ago) and to do everything possible in governments, schools and churches to destroy Adam by miscegenation and mongrelization.
Their incredible success is amply demonstrated in just a few statistics on how attitudes have changed since racial integration and amalgamation became acceptable. In 1958, 4% of US Whites approved of interracial marriages; while in 1997, the figure had risen to 61% (per H. Millard in the Jul-Aug 1997 “Jubilee,” p. 17).
Later statistics from a 2001 survey by the “Washington Post” and others showed that interracial sex was up even more significantly. As reported in the Jul 27, 2001, “The Week” (p. 10), this survey said that four in ten Americans have dated someone of another race and that 75% of these were serious romances. Some 86% of Blacks say that they would date Whites and some 90% of Whites say that they would date Blacks.
Human Gods?
Since the human being is a type of god (deciding right and wrong), then the humanists have pushed for the removal of all restraints on sex--including homosexuality, premarital fornication; and of course, the just mentioned miscegenation.
This gross, sexual permissiveness was the prevailing situation in most of the old sun worship cults in ancient Greece and Rome and as now evident in modern Christian America.
In other words, each person can decide on his/her own about the morality of different sexual situations. Amalekite controlled Hollywood has helped put this over with its more and more progressively open display of perverted sex at the movies and on TV.
Interracial sex, homosexuality and sex outside of marriage are now commonly shown as good things on the boob tube. Sex education and the free distribution of condoms have also helped in this regard. To have a free sex society, abortions (discussed earlier) are almost mandatory or women would be having all kinds of unwanted children--so abortions have been pushed as well.
Age Ending Miscegenation Foretold
It is interesting that YESHUA predicted this sickening time when He noted that there would be a repeat of the times of Noah in the age end with people marrying and giving in marriage--obviously illegal marriages, since legal marriages are both proper and ELOHIM ordained (Matt 24:37-38; Lu 17:26-27).
Of course, a check of the Torah does spell out the prevalent miscegenation of Adamites with other created beings in Noah’s day to precipitate the flood (Gen 6:1-3). As noted in previous comments, Noah was perfect in his racial genealogy, following this period of massive interracial copulation (Gen 6:8-9).
Daniel likewise had some interesting observations which could also be relevant here. He wrote that as one observes the iron mixed with the tempered clay (in the revived Roman Empire in the age end), “they will mix themselves with the races of mankind” (Dan 2:43, per the Ferrar Fenton translation).
At a first glance, in terms of the contemporary world, one can immediately recognize Adamites (particularly women) crossing with the behemah, chaiyah and nokri. But in the broader perspective, it may now or later include Adamic women crossing with fallen angels (from UFOs?), just as happened in Noah’s day.
Bigger Things Coming
Consequently, this wide acceptance of interracial sex between racially different humans/humanoids could be just a prelude to introduce and desensitize people to accept more advanced miscegenation--involving fallen angels.
On this, it should be noted that some of the people participating in UFO abductions had been or were practicing interracial sex--like a 1961 New England case involving a Negro named Barney Hill and his White wife Betty. Often, the alleged UFO abductions involve sex in some manner. This condition will be assessed in some detail in a later chapter focusing upon UFOs.
In short, the pre-flood Adamite peoples had miscegenated themselves out of existence--except for Noah and his immediate family. Manifestly, this is precisely what is happening right now all over the world (Jer 31:27, described earlier). Left unchecked, Adamites (and Israelites) will be completely bred out of existence.
As noted in a prior chapter, this writer recalls a college textbook on anthropology put out in the 1950s which recognized the predictable inevitability of one race across the globe. This textbook went so far to declare that the Polynesians of the Pacific area best represent what this one race would look like physically since the Polynesians are apparently a certain blend of the three to five major races in the world.
Balaam’s Words Recalled
Quite naturally, the people of Yisrael have been the first target of this massive miscegenation campaign, although Satan has the larger objective of destroying the Adam kind completely through miscegenation with the other created humanoids. The intellectual process of accomplishing this genocide was spelled out by Balaam 3,500 years ago, as elaborated upon in a prior chapter beforetime.
The wicked Amalek-Edomites are the obvious persons leading the way on this assault now in progress on the people of Yisrael, as also described in a previous chapter. As this publication has established in numerous former presentations, the Amalek-Edomites are genetically born with a basic hatred and animosity toward Israelites.
This mind-set completely dominates the mentality and thinking of the majority of them--obviously unconsciously, as most assuredly are unaware of why they think and act as they do.
Since these Amalek-Edomites have accumulated vast resources of wealth and corporate power; ownership of prostitute politicians and government leaders; and control of the media and entertainment industries in the Christian Yisrael nations; they have had the means to fully implement Balaam’s advice.
Chapter 315--Christian Humanism and Race II
Impact of Immigration
A prior chapter herein focused upon the immigration problem and its linkage to diabolical and evil Amalek-Edomites. It is this Amalekite control over America and the other White Anglo-Saxon-Celtic nations which has promoted or at least allowed the massive immigration of Coloreds into these countries that were largely White before WWII.
Botswana
The stage was set for more of this Colored immigration to White countries in Botswana, Africa in 1997 at the Southern African Dialogue meeting, when the Malaysian leader Mahathir ben Mohammed said that “If the Third World is not offered its rightful share of global wealth, it should use people mobility as the ultimate weapon.”
Going on, Mohammed added: “We should migrate North in the millions, legally or illegally... masses of Asians and Africans should inundate Europe and America” (Sep 1998 “New Beginnings,” p. 16). Actually, this immigration started earlier than 1997, but it surely has intensified since then.
Mohammed’s words have certainly been coming true--because the Center for Immigration Studies reported on January 4, 2001, that more than 10% of the US population are now immigrants--mostly Coloreds (Jan 22, 2001, “Spotlight,” p. 4). Most have come here in the last ten years.
One would suppose that if millions of Blacks and Asians could migrate into Europe and America to destroy the White culture and civilization, the White nations would have brains enough to take some action to close their borders and protect themselves. But generally, they appear to be so stupid and decadent that they never understand that a flood of Colored peoples from the Third World will destroy them for ever.
It is also true that ignorant White people and their ridiculous policies of humanism in their governments have helped to speed up this massive immigration which is slowly destroying the moral and cultural foundations of their own nations (even in the absence of an immediate flood of Coloreds, as envisioned by Mohammed).
White Christian Encouragement
Since government policies have made it extremely difficult (almost impossible) to hire local American farm hands and laborers (because many Americans are lazy and won’t work, due to the welfare programs), many agricultural producers and companies with nasty jobs are importing and hiring numbers of aliens from the Colored Third World (legally and illegally).
When these people come, they typically stay to integrate and mix with the established residents. This process actually started in the US in the mid 19th century with the importation of Chinese workers to build railroads. But it has intensified in the post WWII environment.
Money and profits have always been the name of the game. And the usual American farm family and/or big corporation (since corporations have taken over American agriculture and almost everything else in the US society) could care less about demographics and the future destruction of their own race and kind because of Colored immigration, coupled with massive miscegenation and interracial sex.
Mohammed on Reparations
The just quoted words of Malaysian leader Mahathir ben Mohammed actually revealed a two pronged motion. In the first place, Mohammed declared that “if” the Colored Third World was not offered (correctly “given”) its supposedly rightful share of global wealth, then the Colored Third World should inundate the White, Christian West with Colored immigrants.
These words (or threats, however one may want to take them) are paving the way for enormous global change in both aspects--the efforts of the ignorant goyim to give their wealth away to impoverished Coloreds and to proceed with massive Colored immigration to completely change the demographics in the White Christian West.
Consequently, Colored people from around the world have been actively pursuing both of these objectives. As outlined in former chapters, they are receiving not only encouragement from the plutocratic Amalekite bankers/masters, but money and other forms of assistance in the leftist political arena to push both objectives to fruition.
The American Dilemma
Consequently, the United States has had a very dedicated and professionally led motion (by plutocratic Amalekite bankers/masters) for the US government to pay reparations to Black Americans for their supposedly former slavery and discrimination at the hands of the majority Whites. The plan is for America to pay each Black person $10,000 (or more).
“Spotlight” (p. 2) of February 28, 2001, offered the obvious conclusion on this line that modern America will now have to pay reparations and restitution to the American Black descendants of slaves who were in the US some 150 years ago. Sure enough, Congressman John Conyers has introduced legislation to pay these reparations (the Jul 2001 “American Sentinel,” p. 2, says that this motion is serious and may succeed).
Any number of prominent US newspapers and media sources have endorsed the plan and have begun promotional campaigns to mesmerize and zombiize the gullible American public to accept it. Here, one can mention the “New York Times,” the “Philadelphia Inquirer,” and the “Hartford, Connecticut Courant.”
Extortion
Already, various Black power groups (like Jesse Jackson’s PUSH and the NAACP) are going after private businesses with extortion for alleged wrongs to Negroes. Jesse Jackson and his PUSH organization have extracted millions of dollars from US companies (which panic and run in absolute fear that Jackson will publicly attack them as racists and White supremacists). Most gladly pay off to stay in his good graces.
The Feb 11, 2003, Spokane “Spokesman-Review” (p. A10) had an AP report on “Trial set in use of rhyme that has a racist history” which revealed a Black lawsuit in Kansas City which was about as ridiculous as possible. The basis for this stupidity surfaced when an airline stewardess with Southwest Airlines said “Eenie, meenie, minie, moe: pick a seat, we gotta go” as a part of asking people to sit down for the takeoff.
Well, too bad for the airlines, but there were two Black women on board who immediately said that they were offended because of the alleged “racist” remark. They filed a lawsuit against the airline seeking millions of dollars in damages.
Thus, many companies are now being forced to pay huge payoffs in extortion to Blacks or face enormous trouble (of course, their customers end up paying these extortion payments).
The NAACP says that it wants money from insurance companies who formally insured slave owners, as well as restitution from companies who once bought cotton from Southern plantation owners. These companies will either begin paying huge extortion payments or Black lawyers will move in on them like leeches to really extort money in expensive court actions.
Lawsuits
O. J. Simpson’s lawyer Johnnie Cochran and some other leading trial lawyers are making preparations to launch a class action lawsuit by 2003 against the US government and various private corporations which they say benefited from slavery. The Blacks also want a payoff from Washington because they say that slave labor was involved in building the US capitol.
Apparently, this team of lawyers is led by Black Harvard law professor Charles Ogletree (Mar 1, 2002, “The Week,” p. 36). The group has organized a Reparations Coordinating Committee which has identified several businesses that they will initially go after--like Aetna Insurance, New York Life, AIG, J. P. Morgan Bank and Chase Manhattan Bank (or now, the J. P. Morgan-Chase Bank, after its merger).
If success is achieved and they are able to rip off huge sums of money from these businesses, this team of lawyers can extend their scope of operations to all kinds of people, businesses and governmental entities. The sky is the future in this extortion game; because in the big cities, these lawyers will have largely Black juries who will routinely award huge damages to the Blacks.
In time, this motion could spread to the entire Southern states--to include all governments (city, county and state) and almost all private businesses and citizens of the Old South. The Black lawyers and supporters can accuse virtually the entirety of the US South for slavery practiced 150 years ago.
With public pressure, the entire South can incur such massive restitution payments to the Blacks that it would destroy the Southern economy and White population. As will be discussed in a later chapter, the Blacks have long had their eyes set upon taking possession of the American South and establishing a Black government there. This reparation thing could help pave the way in this endeavor.
When Russian and Chinese conquerors enter the US, their Black allies can present their claims to them for resolution. Surely, they will be sympathetic and gladly turn over the Old South to the Blacks--lock, stock and barrel.
The Global Motion
Actually, Mohammed’s counsel on going after reparations and payoffs (as outlined above) has caught on well beyond the United States--actually all around the world.
Colored Third World nations (through the UN and other global outreaches and power structures) are demanding that White, Western, Christian nations shell out grants to them for all their so-called sufferings and deprivations (as if the Coloreds are not responsible for their troubles, but that the White man is responsible).
The far reaching aspects of this plan was pointed out in a “New American” magazine article of February 2001 on “The True Cost of Reparations,” as quoted in the Mar-Apr 2001 “America’s Promise Newsletter” (p. 1, 4).
As “New American” reported-- “The slavery reparations movement is the domestic element of a global campaign demanding that the developed nations of the West can compensate Africa for their unjust enrichment through supposed exploitation of the continent.” While this article focused upon Africa’s demand for money, the idea can quickly encompass the world.
Already, the UN has conducted a “World Conference Against Racism, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance,” in South Africa in the summer of 2001. This conference focused upon the question of reparations for Black African countries. Cuba’s Castro reportedly spoke out in favor of it and led the motion in that direction (Jul 2001 “American Sentinel,” p. 3).
More
Of course, the Amalekite bankers/masters are not going to be pushing for Black reparations without them somehow getting in on the action. And they do have a motion underway.
US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright in February 2000 spoke out in favor of requiring monetary compensation for the “slave laborers” used by the Germans in WWII. Germany has already paid out billions to so-called holocaust survivors. The Albright scheme is just one more which will open the door for more German pay outs. This news report of Albright appeared in the just cited Feb 28, 2000, “Spotlight” (p. 2).
As stupid as these various reparation schemes appear, they all may reach fruition (unless the money system destructs first before the votes can be tallied). As things now stand, the German government will probably have to pay reparations to the descendants of the people used in WWII concentration camp work projects. Surely, the US will entertain the same idea for American Blacks.
Tax Credits
In anticipation of ripping off huge sums of money from the gullible US taxpayers, a movement commenced in 2001 and 2002 for Black people to claim a tax credit for reparations on their tax returns (Apr 29, 2002, “American Free Press,” p. 4). Hundreds of Blacks have claimed these credits and the US Treasury has been allowing them. Some $30 million was paid out (including almost $90,000 to one recipient).
While these tax credits are illegal and probably will be eventually stopped by the IRS, there is little doubt that the improper pay outs will never be collected. Thus, the people who worked this scam seem to have gotten away with it.
Chapter 316--Christian Humanism and Race III
Some South African History
Several other chapters in this production address the absolute racial crisis that has erupted in the once stable, prosperous, happy land of South Africa. A few years ago, the internationalists were able to force racial integration and amalgamation upon the White-minority people of South Africa and the result has been an utter disaster.
While many intelligent observers can grasp what has happened and is happening to South Africa (primarily because of the ruling plutocrats, as will be assessed in later chapters), the “why” for this catastrophe seems to largely escape recognition. To appreciate the why, it is necessary to review some South African history.
At the start, it must be realized that all of the peoples now in South Africa came here over the years since 1500 as immigrants. Before 1500, even Blacks were located North near the Congo River. They started moving into East Central Africa in about 1500 (“Concise Columbia Encyclopedia,” p. 790).
The first White, Dutch settlers came to the Southern part of Africa in 1652 and established the Cape Colony (which covered Southern Africa). When these Whites arrived, they found the area largely uninhabited, though there were a few neighboring, primitive, Black Bushmen (pigmies) and Hottentots (also known as Khokhoi, which inhabited Namibia, a territory to the North of South Africa).
Over the years, these Bushmen and Hottentots have totally vanished from historic South Africa (because of the encroaching civilization of the Whites, the murderous slaughter of other Blacks in Natal by the Zulus [as described in a prior chapter], and for other reasons). However, some 40,000 of the Khokhoi still live in Namibia today (“Concise Columbia Encyclopedia,” p. 450).
As pointed out in a previous chapter, it seems probable also that the Zulus (a historic Bantu people) inhibited Zululand (in Natal, to the North and East of the Cape Colony), evidently from the 16th century on (they probably arrived in the Natal from the migrations of Bantu Africans from the North, as indicated above).
Besides the early Dutch, other Whites also came to the Cape Colony over the years. French Huguenot settlers came in the years 1688-1694; and eventually, the British came and took over the colony by force in 1795 (“An Encyclopedia of World History,” p, 884). Slowly, White settlements to the North in Natal and Botswana began to increase.
The Economic Considerations
As early as 1657, the White Dutch began to practice slavery using Black slaves from the North. But slavery was never a big undertaking in South Africa. By 1707, there were only 1,100 slaves as compared with 1,780 White freeholders (“Concise Columbia Encyclopedia,” p. 790). Even when the British abolished slavery in 1834, there were only 34,000 slaves (“An Encyclopedia of World History,” p. 885).
With the abolishment of slavery, it appears that most of the South Afrikaners were Whites. Even the large Zulu population (to the North) was in the Natal province, which was separate in the early days from South Africa proper (which was effectively the old Cape Colony). Zululand was annexed to South Africa in 1887.
And this was the prevailing racial climate in South Africa for the next many years. Black laborers were so short in supply that the fat cat owners of sugar plantations in Natal began to import Indians from India to work the plantations in 1860.
This was the next group of immigrants to impact upon South Africa. This motion included the famous Mahatma Gandhi (1869-1948), a lawyer, who came to South Africa for awhile as a young man to represent the Indians present and to cause trouble (as he did).
In 1886, gold was discovered in the Transvaal and by 1888, diamonds had also become important in Southern Africa. The famous Cecil Rhodes (founder of the Rhodes Trust and the British round tables, to be later discussed) and various fat cats (mainly Amalek