EZEKIEL
and YHWH’s
Judgment
for the
Good News
PEOPLE
VOLUME XXIX
Amalekite Conspiracy
EZEKIEL and YHWH’s
Judgment for the
Good News People
Volume XXIX--Amalekite Conspiracy
by
an unworthy servant
And you shall know the truth,
and the truth will make you free.
(John 8:32)
Common Law Copyright, 2003 & 2005 CE, an unworthy servant, Calder, Idaho. The author claims his Right of exclusive ownership and control of this publication, the fruit of his labor, as a matter of Intellectual Property protected by the Laws of YHWH and as guaranteed by the US Constitution for the United States. Permission is granted to quote provided appropriate credit is cited together with the Publisher’s web site name and postal mailing address––WWW.AgeEnd.Com PO Box 473, Calder, ID 83808, USA.
Contents
Volume XXIX--Amalekite Conspiracy
CHAPTER PAGE
- Cover Page 1
- Title Page 2
- Contents 3
- Publisher’s Preface 5
Part KKKK--Judges 9
449 Judges 9 6
450 Media Control 14
451 Amalekites in Many Places 25
452 The Early Amalekite Push to Rule 29
453 Some Amalekite Successes 33
Part LLLL--The Amalekite Internationalists
454 The Amalekite Conspiracy 43
455 The Modern State of Israel 50
456 Control of the Israeli Government 58
457 Israeli Politics and Peace 61
458 The Amalekites Versus Religious Jews 73
459 The Secularization of Religious Jews 87
460 Israeli Intelligence Organizations 97
461 Amalekite Control in the West 99
Part MMMM--The Cunning Amalekites
462 Amalekite Plotting in the West 105
463 The Amalekites Call the US Shots 111
464 Yes, Amalekites Control US Politics 118
465 Clannish Edomites 129
466 Double Crosses and the Amalekites 136
467 Amalekite Sabbatianism 151
468 Amalekites, in Conclusion 161
SHEERIT YISRAEL
PO Box 473
Calder, Idaho 83808, USA
Publisher’s Preface
Greetings! The following presentation is volume twenty-nine of a 36-volume production of some 6,000 pages on “Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good News People,” all of which is on the Internet at the www.AgeEnd.com web site.
This overall effort provides an interpretation of the Good News message in the New Testament, its linkage to the book of Ezekiel, and an application of both to the age-end prophecies relating to certain nations and peoples now out in the world. In order for this single volume to be understood and comprehended, it is imperative that the study be read from its beginning--from page one of volume one.
Anyone trying to read this volume or the study’s 6,000 pages at any mid-point will end up in a state of confusion without having read and digested the preceding material. It is crucially important that this work be read in sequence from its beginning--otherwise, the reader will almost certainly end up missing the essence of the message!
The effort was originally set on a Macintosh computer with Microsoft Word 6.0.1. It was set in Helvetica, 12-point type (18 pt on chapter headings); single line spacings; and margins: left 1.2”, right 0.8”, top 0.7”, bottom 0.8” and footer 0.6” (for page numbers).
For further information on obtaining this study in 18 computer floppy disks (IBM-formatted, high density, 2HD, 1.44 MB, 3 1/2 inches); in a single CD-Rom; or in hard copies (when the Internet or a compatible computer is not available); please write the publisher at the above address and send a stamped, self-addressed, long (legal-size), return envelope.
With a CD-Rom or computer floppy disks, the study is readable on Macintosh (systems 5.0 and later) or IBM/compatible (with Microsoft Word-Windows) personal computers. May The Great CREATOR and SOVEREIGN OF THE UNIVERSE bless you as you study His word to learn His will and to obey Him. Shalom (peace) to you and yours!
an unworthy servant, Hanukkah 2003 CE
Chapter 449--Judges 9
Abimelech
Along the same line of thought from the previous chapters on the allegorical meaning of the word "tree" in the Scriptures, the book of Judges (chapter 9) has an interesting parable about a man named Abimelech who decided that he would take charge and rule over other people at a very early time. He actually came to be one of the OT judges (a usurper), who ruled Yisrael for three years (Jud 9:22).
The Judges 9 parable concerns the olive tree, the fig tree, the vine, the bramble bush and seemingly others. As the story goes, the olive tree was too busy to rule over the other trees; also, the grape vine was too busy; and the fig tree was too busy.
But the bramble bush stepped forward and arrogantly asserted that he would rule the trees (Jud 9:1-57). And he would have continued to do so were it not for YHWH’s apparent act to intervene and cause problems for Abimelech, evidently after three years (Jud 9:22-23). This sounds much like an ante-type of the age end Beast.
In explaining the Judges parable, the point was conveyed that Abimelech, an evil man, who killed 70 of his half brothers, was the bramble bush, which Young's "Analytical Concordance" says is a low thistle or thorn bush. As a person can quickly discover in an assessment of this prophecy, it is profoundly important in the scheme of things if correctly understood.
Identity of the Trees
Elsewhere, in other Scriptures, the identity of the various trees are stated and made plain. For example, Yisrael, possibly in her unified sense, is the olive tree (Ps 52:8; 128:3; Jer 11:16; Hos 14:6). On this, it is also true that sometimes Yisrael prophetically, is, or will be in the future, a "green" olive tree--implying one that is fresh and flourishing (per Young's).
In fact, this olive tree symbol probably is referring to not only Israelites generally, but more precisely to Israelites who have been transformed to the true Hebrew religion or will be so changed in the future with the reality of the coming New Covenant.
In the way of preliminary support for this thesis, Moshe wrote that the children of Yisrael were to be a kingdom of priests and a separated and set apart (Hebrew kodesh) nation (Ex 19:3-6). With this background, the Apostle Shaul’s opening remarks on the olive tree allegory (mentioned in prior chapters) also referred to the olive tree in the context of being "kodesh" and consecrated (Rom 11:16).
Manifestly, the words of Moshe and Shaul combine to add a definite religious dimension to the racial factors associated with the olive tree. Obviously too, in this context, individual Israelites are olives or olive trees, as the Book also states (Zech 4:3-12; Rev 11:4).
Consequently, in these cited examples of the "olives," all of the persons involved in the descriptions are not only Israelites, but they are undoubtedly, more correctly, Israelites of the true religious faith of YHWH, as observed by Avraham, Moshe and certain others throughout history. This fact substantiates Shaul’s just mentioned remarks.
The Vine
Going on, one finds that the vine is clearly identified as the House of Yisrael (Jer 6:9; Hos 9:10; 10:1; Joel 1:7).
Again, the prophet Yirmeyahu had some more perceptive comments when he actually went so far as to say that the House of Yisrael was not only a vine, but one planted as a choice vine. This choice vine had went on to become one with degenerate shoots of a wild, strange (nokri) vine--evidently because of a subsequent transition into a melting pot of various humans/humanoids (Jer 2:21).
Here, please note that even though they were degenerate shoots of a wild vine, they still remained a vine. Therefore, if one follows the same analogy with the olive tree, which must be done, then it follows that the wild olive shoots outlined by Shaul are Israelites, regardless of the fact that they are wild and cut off from the good stem.
The whole thrust of this reference by Shaul is that the grafting in process has to address Israelites (who had been divorced and/or cut off from YHWH and thence "wild"), whomever they might be, and wherever they might be located (in a new wilderness land). There is just no way that any other persons could be involved in this message.
The Fig Tree
As the Scriptures assert, the fig tree is clearly the Jews and/or the House of Yehudah (broached earlier), as Yirmeyahu so correctly observed--many centuries ago (Jer 24:1-10). Please note, again, that by Yirmeyahu's perception, there were both good figs-Jews, as well as bad figs-Jews.
And also, as mentioned earlier, it could be that The MESSIAH’s outline of the parables of the sheep and goats (Matt 25:32-33) and of the wheat and tares (Matt 13:24-30) both address the situation with the Jews (as well as with Yisrael generally).
Perhaps it is because of this exact situation (of good figs and bad figs being present together) that the fig tree symbolizes the House of Yehudah and/or the Jews, collectively. After all, the Jews have undergone a process of miscegenation with nokri/nekar aliens over the centuries, coupled with an outright amalgamation of numbers of Kenites and Amalek-Edomites. Truly, the racial Jews are a product of good and bad.
It is no wonder then that YESHUA would so often refer to the fig tree when He sojourned among us (Matt 21:19-21; 24:32; Mk 11:13, 20, 21; 13:28; Lu 13:6-7; 21:29; John 1:48, 50). Not only did He make these frequent references about the fig tree; but in one instance, He even placed a curse upon it, as outlined previously (Matt 21:19-20; Mk 11:13-14, 20-21; Lu 13:6-9).
A question can surface here on "why" for the curse? Assuredly, the fig tree has had some "bad" qualities and features (perhaps the just noted presence of the nokri/nekar Amalekites) to probably justify the condemnation and curse. Yet, despite this fact, YESHUA does allow for its ultimate rebirth and blooming in the age end (Matt 24:32; Mk 13:28). Incidentally, did this curse end in 1948 or 1967? It could be!
James 3:12
Additionally, on this theme, Yakov (Jas 3:12) elsewhere observes that a grape vine cannot bring forth figs (so the House of Yisrael could never be the Jews), nor can a fig tree bear olive berries (hence, the wild olive shoots cannot be Jews from the House of Yehudah). Here, one might pause to refresh his/her thinking with the earlier citation of YHWH's act of pruning off some of the natural, olive branches (Rom 11:23).
Paradoxically, if a fig tree cannot produce olives, as Yakov clearly said, then it seemingly cannot bear wild, olive shoots or even natural, olive branches to be pruned off, as indicated by Shaul. The answer to this enigma is obviously complex and this writer would dare not attempt to be dogmatic in interpreting it.
However, the solution to this dilemma probably lies in the definition of the trees. Perhaps both the vine and fig tree are addressed from a strictly fleshly viewpoint; while evidently, the olive tree involves both fleshly and spiritual dimensions, as noted above and as will shortly be elaborated upon.
Consequently, it might well be that the broken or pruned off olive branches constitute "good" Jews, both from a religious and racial perspective. So the place one can come to here is that the House of Yehudah, collectively (the fig tree), is not responsible for the production of the good Jews (from both a religious and racial context).
Bad Figs
Incidentally, on this idea that there was something wrong with the House of Yehudah which did act to preclude her from totally producing "good" Jews (figs), one only has to consider Yirmeyahu’s remarks (Jer 24), cited earlier, in conjunction with Shaul’s comments about the pruning of the olive tree, as discussed earlier.
Indeed, it is evident that the House of Yehudah has been extremely responsible for sin and miscegenation, coupled with her outright acceptance, assimilation and integration of numbers of Amalek-Edomites and other nokri/nekar strangers into what should be the true, recognized, legitimate remnant of Yisrael.
Manifestly, the overall House of Yehudah and/or the collective Jews have been grossly damaged; though certain, individual, true Jews could maintain their own personal integrity and religion and remain good figs.
In support of this possibility, there are a host of good reasons to believe that the stem and/or root system of the olive tree not only goes back to the patriarchs and their ability to fleshly produce seed; but also, to them in terms of their personalities, characters and their true, Scriptural, Hebrew religion (which played a role in establishing the character of their progeny).
To be sure, the House of Yehudah, on her own merit, seems to have produced many "bad" figs and therefore cannot bring forth olives, as Yakov asserted (Jas 3:12).
The good (racial and religious) figs found in the remnant of the House of Yehudah might be there--not because of the leadership, policies, actions and thinking of the collective Jews or the House of Yehudah; but rather, are there in spite of such adversities.
Hence, it is possible that the Jewish branches, which were broken off of the olive tree by YHWH, were, in fact, both racially and religiously, good ones drawing upon their ancestry and the Hebrew religion for sustenance. Truly, it is this Israelite racial and religious system which has produced the good Jews and not the corrupt practices of the fig tree House of Yehudah or the Jews collectively.
Admittedly, in time, and perhaps during the Babylonian exile or later, the true Hebrew or Israelite faith was contaminated by a few unscriptural Talmudic factors, probably traceable to the bad figs who had become so entrenched in the House of Yehudah. But can one condemn the whole religion of Judaism over the pollution which had crept in? This question was assessed in former chapters.
The Thorns
However, in returning to the Judges 9 prophecy, please observe that the bramble bush, under discussion, is a low life, thorn bush (obviously, producing thorns and briers). Of most importance for interpretation, the Canaanite inhabitants of the land of Yisrael and apparently other nokri/nekar aliens (including the Edomites, who crossed with the line of Cain) were clearly called thorns (Num 33:55; Jud 2:3).
Moreover, these very thorns (Amalek-Edomites and/or Canaanites) could well have been the precise thorn in the flesh which bothered Shaul and possibly others in New Testament times as well (II Cor 12:7). As a matter of information, the idea of someone being a thorn in the side of another person is a very old figure of speech which is still used today.
For example, the April 8, 2002, “Time” magazine (p. 19) had a news report by Douglas Waller on “The Thorn in His Side, Part II” with a photograph of President George W. Bush and his long standing opponent, Senator John McCain. Nothing needed to be said beyond the headline and the photograph; because, for some years now, McCain has been one of the primary opponents and critics (yes, a thorn in the side) of GWB.
Manifestly, it would be easy to see that this expression had some recognition and use in ancient times. Of course, by letting the Scriptures define themselves, it is clear that the thorns and briers were certain racial/ethnic peoples who did cause much trouble and concern to the various Scriptural people of Yisrael.
Someday, some, many or all of these thorns and briers will meet their YHWH ordained fate and judgment--they will be eventually burned up, as was described earlier (Isa 9:18; 27:4).
A Tree is Known by its Fruit
In the NT, there is an interesting text which also seems relevant here. On this, YESHUA said that you can know men by their fruits and that men cannot pick grapes from thorns (thorn bushes) or figs from thistles (Matt 7:16). Moreover, a good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, nor can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.
Every tree that does not bring forth good fruit will be cut down and cast into the fire--in judgment by YHWH (Matt 7:17-19). Manifestly, grapes (which are House of Yisrael Israelites) cannot come from a thorn bush; nor can figs (at least true, Jewish, Israelite figs) come from thistles.
Therefore, persons of Canaanite, Amalekite and/or Satanic ancestry cannot possibly be Israelites. Since they cannot be Israelites, they seemingly cannot be converted or become a part of Yisrael in any definition. They are corrupt and evil and will one day be judged by YHWH.
Of course, this whole discussion on the thorns and bramble bush has to be significant because it may tie in some way to the genealogy of the Jews, as was discussed elsewhere in this study in terms of YESHUA's commission which seemingly omitted the Jews (Matt 10:5-6).
“Pesikta De-Rab Kahana,” Revisited
This linkage of thorns to the Amalek-Edomites has support from the Sabbath teachings of ancient Jewish synagogues. Specifically, Piska 2 has a commentary on Proverbs 15:19 in the context of a slothful man being like a hedge of thorns. The slothful man is supposed to be Esau (in allegory, the Jews evidently thought that this was Rome in Second Temple days).
Thus, the Amalek-Edomites are like a prickly hedge to keep jabbing at a man to bring on the head tax, general tax, agriculture tax, animal tax, etc. When the man cannot pay the excessive taxes, Esau exacts heavy fines and imposes drastic penalties (“Pesikta De-Rab Kahana,” p. 23).
Does this sound familiar in terms of the modern House of Yisrael nations, now being controlled and heavily taxed by Amalek-Edomite bankers/masters?
Edomite Thorns Tie to Idolatry
“The Book of Legends Sefer Ha-Aggadah,” with legends from the Talmud and Midrash, links thorns to idolatry in two amazing ancient stories (p. 43).
An item number 53 offers some comments upon Genesis 25:22, in the vein of Rebekah’s pregnancy. The story is that when she would pass a synagogue or house of study, the unborn Yakov was scurrying in his eagerness to get out. And when passing houses of idolatry, the evil Esau was scurrying in his eagerness to get out.
In a commentary on Genesis 25:27, and the remark on the growth of the two boys, Yakov and Esau, an item number 55 quotes R. Levi, who said that (at first) the boys were like a myrtle and a wild rose growing side by side. As they grew up, the former (Yakov) would yield its characteristic fragrance (reho) and the latter (Esau) its thorns (hoho).
Going on, the boys studied and went to school until age 13. At the end of the 13 years, one son (Yakov) went to houses of study and the other (Esau) went to shrines of idolatry.
Abimelech From Cain?
In going back to Abimelech and the parable from Judges, please recognize that though Abimelech was a son of Gideon, he also was a mixed blooded son of a slave woman from Shechem (Jud 8:31; 9:18). The question now surfaces--was this woman a Canaanite or Edomite, so that Abimelech was a nokri/nekar racially?
Well, as a matter of fact, the Book does link in tandem the presence of the Canaanite men of Hamor to Shechem, the home and base of support of Abimelech. Possibly, his mother and some or even all of the other peoples of Shechem were Canaanites and thus nokri/nekar thorns.
Additionally, on this, an article in the Winter 1992 "Radical Reformation" (p. 30), by Wayne S. Nelson, on the Book of Judges, discusses this issue and concludes that the author of Judges “implicitly identifies Abimelech as morally and spiritually a descendant of Cain and therefore of the seed of the serpent.”
Though Nelson does not attempt to link Abimelech to Kain on physical, racial grounds, this condition must not be overlooked. If Naamah was the wife of Ham, as Jewish tradition has it, then the Canaanites (to likely include Abimelech through his mother) were surely of the lineage of both Kain and Kain’s father (Gen 3:1-4, 12; II Cor 11:3; I Jo 3:12).
Regardless of Abimelech's true racial background, the writer of this study would have to agree with Mr Nelson. And this might all have something to do with why the Jews were not enumerated in YESHUA’s commission, which was discussed in preceding chapters.
The very mention of Shechem is relevant because the Talmud says that Shechem is the place where bad things happen and the place “set aside for punishment” (Sotah 11a, Jan-Feb 2001 “Prophecy Flash,” p. 9). As noted earlier, Jewish tradition has it that Eliphaz lurked after Yakov at Shechem. And per Ben Sira, the evil Edomites dwelt at Shechem. Shechem is further addressed in other remarks elsewhere herein.
Yeshayahu's Perception
This presentation on the thorns creates a need here to mention a very important prophecy by Yeshayahu--which he interestingly saw fit to repeat. Early on, he realized and said that in a coming time of doom for the House of Yisrael, the vine of Yisrael would be removed from its inhabited land and only thorns and briers would remain (Isa 5:6; 7:25; 32:13).
It would appear here that, in effect, these words by Yeshayahu would apply at least to the ancient House of Yisrael, if not to the ultimate age ending House of Yisrael. And what remained in the land (Samaria) after the fall of Yisrael in the 7th and 8th centuries BCE? Why, nokri/nekar Cutheans, Canaanites, Edomites and others who took the land over (all of whom appear to be thorns and briers, symbolically in the Book).
Obviously, Yeshayahu, in prophecy, was not allowing for the Samaritans, Canaanites, Edomites and other mamzer peoples in the land to be linked to the vine of Yisrael which was removed. Assuredly, as Yeshayahu saw it, all of these persons were not Israelites; but were, in fact, thorns and briers. The essence of this is that the Samaritans and the others are not of Yisrael, contrary to the wishes of some who would so argue.
There is a final consideration on these amazing prophecies by Yeshayahu. Since prophecy is dual and repetitive in fulfillment and since the House of Yisrael faces a second, coming period of punishment from YHWH for sin (Ezek 4-7), it is evident that when the House of Yisrael is once more thrust into captivity for the last time, only thorns and briers will remain in her then existing land (Isa 5:6; 7:25; 32:13).
The Bramble Bush
Going back to the Judges allegory under discussion, the bramble bush is clearly linked to Abimelech. But there has to be more to this parable than just a focus on Abimelech. Frankly, it would appear that the whole story is one of far reaching prophetic implications--if one could but understand it.
Both Mattityahu (Matt 7:16) and Luke (Lu 6:44) say that a tree is identified by its fruit and that neither grapes or figs, racially, come from the bramble bush (which produces thorns, as noted above). Consequently, it must be surmised that the bramble bush is categorically not of true Yisrael.
Who then, ethnically or genetically, is the bramble bush? Elsewhere, in the Word, it is useful to note that at a described fall of Edom, thorns and brambles surfaced therein (Isa 34:13).
Thus, could brambles be linked in some way to the Edomites? Evidently, the answer is yes--in view of their links to Kain (from Esau’s marriages with Canaanite women and possible other ties to the Kenites) and the bramble bush’s arrogance of power, as suggested in the Abimelech prophecy.
Hence, this likelihood intensifies as one considers the situation in the first centuries BCE and CE when the Herods (Amalek-Idumeans) ruled over the Jewish remnant, the Temple and part of the Palestine area. One of the several complaints about Herod’s rule was his devotion to high taxation upon the common people (“Judaism From Cyrus to Hadrain,” p. 336, 364).
High and oppressive taxation was also one of the things mentioned about the Edomites in Piska 2, cited above. Truly, the same thing has happened today. Thus, in more modern times, Amalekite Khazars, using their great riches and wealth, are in enormous positions of strength and influence over the House of Yisrael and other portions of the globe at large. They still love high taxes.
Chapter 450--Media Control
The Amalekite Media Power Base
If there is one single definition that has materially contributed to the incredible success of the Amalekite Jews to literally steal the Christian West and implement fantastic control measures (right and left) which are and will utterly destroy Adam in the Christian West (and particularly, in the House of Yisrael nations and peoples), it is the media and entertainment industries.
Literally, on the surface, there would seem to be an incomprehensible array of thousands and thousands of newspapers, magazines, Internet sources, movie studios, radio and television companies and so forth in the Christian West. At a first glance, many observers would believe that this mass of businesses and activities is totally divided and competitive to the last drop. But that belief is not the truth.
The December 27, 1999, “Spotlight” (p. 12-13) had an article by Michael Collins Piper on “Handful of Families, Corporations Controlling the Global Media Monopolies,” previously cited, which got to the heart of the problem by laying out most of the major firms and interconnections and owners (most of which involve evil Amalekite Jews).
Since whole books have been and can be written on this theme, the comments herein will be limited. But a few names and connections will be outlined to prove the point.
AOL-Time-Warner, Revisited
Previous comments herein on Amalekite crime briefly mentioned the situation with the AOL-Time-Warner Company and several of its major Amalekite owners, players and controllers over the years (like the previously described Bronfman family and its vast holdings).
While some persons could lose sight of the Amalekite presence by becoming impressed with Ted Turner and his ties to AOL-Time-Warner (actually, Turner’s former ties because the Amalekites moved in on him and removed him from power in AOL-Time-Warner, as pointed out earlier), the fact remains that AOL-Time-Warner’s major bosses are largely Amalekite Jews.
How big is AOL-Time-Warner? It is enormous (a $350 billion company)--owning many movie and video companies, various cable franchises, Turner Broadcasting (including CNN), numerous magazines (Time, People, Sports Illustrated for Kids, Life, Fortune, Money, etc), many major book publishers, AOL (America On-line, the giant Internet service provider--with the early 2000 merger) and on and on.
The Seagrams (liquor) Company, mentioned in a prior chapter, is (or has been) also owned and/or controlled by the Bronfmans. It is another big player in the media and entertainment industries. Seagrams is a major stockholder in AOL-Time-Warner--plus Universal Studios, the Universal Music Group, Polygram and other major music and television companies across Europe.
More Media Control
The previously mentioned Rupert Murdoch (Amalekite?) owns or controls a whole assortment of media enterprises all over the world, through his News Corporation--including the New York Post, the Weekly Standard and Fox Television.
Another likely Amalekite Jew, Michael Eisner, runs Disney Corporation; which in turn, owns or controls ABC radio and television, Miramex Films (under the leadership of the two evident Amalekites named Harvey and Bob Weinstein) and a whole host of newspapers, other publishers, television companies, etc (locally and globally).
The VIACOM Company is one more of the huge media and entertainment companies with major holdings in Paramount Pictures, MTV and the Blockbuster video chain. It is also in the process of acquiring CBS radio and television from Westinghouse.
VIACOM is headed by Sumner Redstone (whose name doesn’t sound like an Amalekite name; but since he has close ties to the Israelis and looks like an Amalekite, he probably is one).
General Electric controls NBC, CNBC, the Bravo cable channel, Arts & Entertainment, the History Channel and Court TV. It is unclear as to how much of General Electric is in Amalekite hands. But one can be sure that much of it is owned/controlled by Amalekites.
SONY is another large media and entertainment giant, ostensibly controlled by Japanese billionaire Oboyki Idei (who is thought to be a front man for the behind the scenes Rockefellers--per “Spotlight”). As pointed out elsewhere herein, SONY seems to be an acronym for Standard Oil of New York. The Rockefellers seem to be Christian Amalekites as well (as noted earlier and to be addressed in the following chapters).
The German media company Bertelsmann (established in 1835) is the next major media player. This company owns Random House Publishing and many other publishing enterprises scattered all over the world.
Still More From “Spotlight”
As is true for General Electric, “Spotlight” did not spell out the Amalekite ownership and/or control of Bertelsmann. But it is a certainty that Ashkenazi Amalekites are heavily involved. That’s why WWII was fought--so that the plutocrats could steal much of Germany and Japan.
The “Spotlight” article said that there were eleven major companies which controlled the bulk of the American media industry in 1989. Today, there are the nine powers, as described above. As the “American Free Press” noted in a 2002 article, two of these nine power centers are owned by one family. This source also noted that every single supermarket tabloid is owned by just one, single, super-rich, Wall Street firm.
The “what is happening here” question can be simply stated. Media power is being centralized into fewer and fewer hands (mostly Amalekite Jews), which is the same phenomenon happening in all businesses all over the world.
If all of that wasn’t enough, it is interesting that the Bush people have a plan afoot which will further centralize media power into fewer and fewer hands. This story was brought out by Michael Collins Piper on “Media Giants Crave Absolute Control” in the Dec 16 & 23, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 1, 20).
Per Piper, the Federal Communications Commission (the FCC, under the chairmanship of Colin Powell’s son Michael) is considering a plan to loosen or do away entirely with regulations that limit the number of newspapers and radio and television outlets that a single company can own. This will open the door for a handful of Amalekite Jew bankers/masters to completely take over the whole industry.
Amalekite big shots like Mort Zuckerman, S. I. Newhouse, the Bronfmans and others will quickly move to consolidate their media powers once the industry is deregulated. They then can more easily control the political future of the US.
Incidentally, a former chapter briefly mentioned the situation in Russia where the Amalekite Khazars have been attempting to take control of the Russian media business. The billionaire Zionist leader and evident Amalekite, Vladimir Gusinsky (or Gushinsky), has owned much of the Russian economy, plus one important Moscow TV station (which he may have lost or is losing).
Vivendi
While the above cited nine major media players have and still seem to control the essence of the media and entertainment businesses in modern America, another development surfaced temporarily in the early 21st century to further complicate the question of centralization into a few hands.
The basis of this new development was a Frenchman named Jean-Marie Messier who controlled Vivendi, the world’s largest drinking water company in France.
Within the last couple of years (in 2000-2001), Messier and his colleagues branched out into the US media and entertainment market in a big way to form another media giant, appropriately called Vivendi. Vivendi’s story was told in the April 29, 2002, “Time” magazine (p. 50-51), in an article by Daren Fonda.
Apparently, the method that Messier used to get into the US media and entertainment markets was through a major acquisition of some of the stock of the liquor company Seagram, which was controlled by the super rich Bronfmans (in a stock trade of Vivendi stock for Seagrams, which allowed Edgar Bronfman Jr to become the Vice-Chairman of Vivendi).
Thus, Messier moved in on Seagrams; and in turn, the process allowed him to take temporary control of various publishing, music, telecom and Internet operations (in the form of the Vivendi media empire, per “Time”). In total, this conglomeration is or was a $55 billion global giant which certainly puts it in the operations of the other media power houses.
The entire article in “Time” (“The French Rejection,” by Daren Fonda) failed to clarify at least a couple of relevant points of concern. Obviously, in 2000-2001, there had to be a question of the continuing role of the Bronfmans and AOL-Time-Warner. Was the Bronfman power block still directly involved with Universal Studios or did they exit the Hollywood scene with the arrival of Messier?
As 2002 developed, Messier allegedly didn’t do very well in running the Vivendi media empire or something else happened to place him at odds with the real Vivendi controllers (who, as it turns out, were the Bronfmans). So Messier was kicked out. Another Frenchman named Jean-Rene Fourtou took over Vivendi as Chairman.
The Jul 15, 2002, “Time” magazine (p. 37-41) had a follow-up story by Daren Fonda on the intrigue in a story on “French Fiasco.” Apparently, Messier put together the Vivendi media giant and Edgar Bronfman Jr and some of his colleagues later joined forces to kick Messier out and replace him with Fourtou (this action proved who really was running Vivendi).
The essence of these stories from “Time” seems to be that the Bronfmans were the power players behind the scenes pulling the strings at the new media giant Vivendi and that people like Messier and Fourtou have been only front men. In other words, the Bronfmans and their AOL-Time-Warner giant may still run things, but in the background and with a much lower profile.
The second big issue that one must broach in this new look is whether Messier and the later Fourtou were Amalekite crooks or not. Reportedly, Fourtou’s real name is Jean Bernard Levy, suggesting that he is indeed an Amalekite Jew who has changed his name (Jul 21, 2003, “American Free Press,” p. 1). The situation with Messier still remains unclear. But he too could be an Amalekite Jew crook.
The fact that that both of the Frenchmen are probably in the billionaire class makes one be very suspicious that both of them are Amalekite Jew bankers/masters in order to play games with the super rich Bronfmans. In which case, it only means that some new Amalekite faces have arrived on the media block.
More on the Newspapers
The Washington Post Company is another major media company in alleged Amalekite hands (the Meyer-Graham group). The Post not only controls the newspaper and Newsweek magazine, but a 50% interest in the International Herald Tribune and the Los Angeles Times-Washington Post News Service, plus numerous other publications and TV stations.
The famous Reuters news service of Europe was created by and owned by the Rothschild family (“The Elite Serial Killers of Lincoln, JFK, RFK & MLK,” p. 21).
Some eight more major media companies own and/or control almost all other major newspapers in the US, plus a large number of radio and television companies, magazines, book publishers, etc.
This list includes the New York Times Co. (owned or controlled by the apparent Amalekite Sulzberger family), Advance Publications (which includes 26 newspapers, plus the weekly Parade magazine--owned or controlled by the likely Amalekite Newhouse family), Gannett Co., Cox Enterprises, E. W. Scripps Co., Hearst Corp., Times Mirror Co. and Knight-Ridder, Inc.
Besides this list of traditional newspapers, all of the major super-market tabloids are owned by one single Wall Street firm (as noted above).
“Spotlight” also quoted a prominent media analyst and critic named Ben Bagdikian who says that some 50 men and women (who are chiefs of their corporations) control more than half of the ideas and information reaching all Americans daily. No wonder it is called the controlled media.
How many of these 50 are Amalekites was not stated. As already noted, most of the American media and entertainment industries are in Amalekite Jew hands. So clearly, many of the 50 are Amalekites (who also are likely bankers/masters and leaders within the Amalekite Jew community). Obviously too, the Rockefellers also still retain some media power (but not much in comparison with the European based Rothschilds).
The tragedy of this centralized control of the media means that a handful of people (apparently all or most all of them are Amalekites racially or at least janissaries, as cited earlier and to be further defined below) decide what is and what is not news. They decide which politicians are acceptable for rule and which are not. They decide which wars are good and which are not. They decide what is truth and what is not.
Since this combine is so limited in numbers and tightly controlled, it is clear that this small group of people can sit around a table and decide the future of the United States and much of the world. They are so powerful that the gullible people (whose source of news, information and thinking comes from this cabal) is completely mesmerized and controlled by them.
This Amalekite led group almost completely controls the thinking in the United States and the White British Commonwealth nations (like Australia, Canada, etc). They are also extremely powerful in South America and Africa. Though they do have enormous power in continental Europe, they do not control all of the European media sources yet. Perhaps their weakest area is Asia where there is some independence.
More on the Media Stranglehold
The April 1, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. A-1 and A-2) had a lead story on “The Media is the Enemy” which illustrated how far this stranglehold has gone. Previous chapters and the above presentation have already mentioned the enormous Amalekite Jew power over the media and there is little need to repeat those lines.
The “American Free Press” said that “In the old Soviet Union, the government controlled the media. Not a word of substance would be published without prior approval from the Bolshevik commissars. Today, in the United States, the situation is starkly similar. But most Americans--most sheeple--don’t even know it.
“In the United States today, it is a select handful of superrich families and tightly-knit financial interests--a plutocratic elite--who own the Big Media and who control the government through their ownership of that media.
“Every single one of the major media outlets is controlled by this powerful interlocking combine...ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Time, Newsweek, U.S. News & World Report, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times, The Chicago-Tribune--even such ‘regional’ giants as The New Orleans Times-Picayune, The Miami Herald, the San Diego Herald Tribune... The list goes on and on.
“And these media powerhouses control dozens--actually thousands--of other daily and weekly newspapers, magazines, and radio and television outlets across America (and around the globe.) Did you know that every single supermarket tabloid is owned by just one, superrich Wall Street banker?
“To consolidate their influence, the Masters of the Media and their international corporate allies reward obedient lapdog journalists with membership in the Council on Foreign Relations or the Trilateral Commission where they rub shoulders with others in the international policy-making networks. A handful get promoted to the higher rank of the secret Bilderberg Group.
“The so-called ‘mainstream’ media is very much a ‘closed shop’ and only those willing to do the bidding of the global power elite need apply. Tom Brokaw, Dan Rather and Peter Jennings and other phonies are just the public faces that the American people see.
“Behind the scenes are the shadowy owners and corporate power brokers who dictate what you will (or will not) see in your daily newspaper or on the evening news.
“The average American has no idea that superrich predators with names like Rockefeller, Rothschild, Bronfman, Newhouse, Murdoch and Redstone are making vast profits and achieving immense power through their stranglehold on the American media (and increasingly, on media around the globe.)
“These shadowy media controllers decide which politicians are ‘in’ and which politicians are ‘out.’ (They made Bill Clinton overnight. They also broke Richard Nixon overnight.)
“The Masters of the Media decide which issues can--or cannot--be debated. (Imagine a public debate over the Federal Reserve system on Ted Koppel’s Nightline. It will never happen!)
“The Masters of the Media promote the perverse, anti-Christian Cultural Communist ideology that permeates publishing and broadcasting today. The Masters of the Media decide which are the ‘good wars’ and which are the ‘bad wars.’ The Masters of the Media decide who is the ‘hero’ and who is the ‘villain.’
“If the Big Media decides that you will be the patsy, then the patsy you will be. It’s that simple. Ask Lee Harvey Oswald or James Earl Ray or Gordon Kahl or Randy Weaver or the victims of Waco. As we said: THE MEDIA IS THE ENEMY.”
Bernie Sanders
The Jul 15, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 1) had an article on the controlled US media which quoted US Congressman Bernie Sanders of Vermont. Sanders said:
“One of our best-kept secrets is the degree to which a handful of huge corporations control the flow of information in the United States. Whether it is television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books or the Internet, a few giant conglomerates are determining what we see, hear and read.
“And the situation is likely to become much worse as a result of radical deregulation efforts by the Bush administration and some horrendous court decisions.
“Television is the means by which most Americans get their ‘news.’ Without exception, every major network is owned by a huge conglomerate that has enormous conflicts of interest.”
Of course, Sanders is on the mark in his remarks. The only thing that he left out is that most of this control is exercised by a handful of Amalekite Jewish bankers/masters.
Harold Wallace Rosenthal, Revisited
Some years ago, US Senator Jacob Javits of New York (a certain, Amalekite Jew) reportedly had a young, Jewish, administrative assistant named Harold Wallace Rosenthal (a likely Amalekite, who was discussed in preceding chapters). Rosenthal, age 29, was killed on Aug 12, 1976, in an alleged sky-jacking incident on an Israeli airliner in Istanbul, Turkey.
In 1976, just before Harold’s death, Walter White Jr, editor of the “Western Front” magazine, interviewed Rosenthal for a story (per a pamphlet on “The Hidden Tyranny, the Rosenthal Document,” p. 1-18). Before publishing the report, Rosenthal was dead and White, himself, was badly beaten. White thinks Rosenthal was murdered by his own people (the Mossad?) because he had a big mouth.
In the interview with White, Harold was most revealing. For instance, he said: “We Jews continue to be amazed with the ease by which Christian Americans have fallen into our hands. While the naive Americans wait for Khrushchev to bury them, we have taught them to submit to our every command” (ibid, p. 1).
In terms of the US money given annually to Israel, Harold noted that “The naive politicians in Washington are gullible. Most of them are not too bright so the powerful Jewish lobbyists influenced this practice years ago and there is no one strong enough to stop it” (ibid, p. 6).
On anti-Semitism, Harold suggested that it “does not signify opposition to Semitism. There is no such thing. It is an expression which we Jews use effectively as a smear word--used to brand as a bigot like you guys--anyone who brings criticism against Jews. We use it against hate mongers” (ibid, p. 6-7).
Regarding why Jews change their names when moving into various countries--Rosenthal said that “Jews are the most intelligent people in the world so if it benefits them to change their names they do so. That’s all there is to it” (ibid, p. 8).
More From Harold
Going on, Harold noted that “...We would all have better understanding between each other--Jews and gentiles--if we spoke out more openly. Your people don’t have guts. We establish your thinking--we even place within you a ‘guilt complex’ making you afraid to criticize Jewry openly” (ibid, p. 11).
On Jewish control of money, Rosenthal said that “At first, by controlling the banking system we were able to control corporation capital. Through this, we acquired total monopoly of the movie industry, the radio networks and the newly developing television media. The printing industry, newspapers, periodicals and technical journals had already fallen into our hands. The richest plum was later to come when we took over the publication of all school materials. Through these vehicles we could mold public opinion to suit our own purposes. The people are only stupid pigs that grunt and squeal the chants we give them, whether they be truth or lies” (ibid, p. 15).
Regarding the silent majority, Harold pointed out-- “There is no such thing as the silent majority because we control their cry and hue. The only thing that exists is an unthinking majority and unthinking they will remain, as long as their escape from our rigorous service is the opiate of our entertainment industry. By controlling industry, we have become the safety valve of momentary pleasure. The television and movie industries furnish the necessary temporary distraction. These programs are carefully designed to appeal to the sensuous emotions, never to the logical thinking mind. Because of this, the people are programmed to respond according to our dictates, not according to reason. Silent they are; unthinkable they will remain” (ibid, p. 15-16).
In a comment on religion, Harold said “With our control of the text book industry and the news media, we have been able to hold ourselves up as the authorities on religion. Many of our rabbis now hold professorship in supposed Christian theological seminaries. We are amazed by the Christians’ stupidity in receiving our teachings and propagating them as their own... These deluded children of the Church defend us to the point of destroying their own culture... Through our influence of religion we were able to involve the ignorant white Christians in war against themselves which always impoverished both sides while we reaped a financial and political harvest. Anytime truth comes forth which exposes us, we simply rally our forces--the ignorant Christians. They attack the crusaders even if they are members of their own families” (ibid, p. 18).
Jack Bernstein, Revisited
A preceding chapter quoted an American Jew named Jack Bernstein. Jack went to the state of Israel before 1970 as an immigrant. Bernstein, an Ashkenazi, married a Sephardi girl and started a family. In time, he became disillusioned over the gross evil and wickedness that he found in the Israeli state. He returned to the US and began a program to inform Americans about conditions in the Israeli state.
Jack published at least a couple of writings to discuss his findings. One of them, “My Farewell to Israel, The Thorn in the Mideast,” was quoted extensively in a prior chapter on the Modern State of Israel. One of the subjects which Bernstein brought up in his Farewell booklet is the issue of the media and how the Ashkenazi Zionists control it.
In the first place, Jack charges that the Zionists and the Zionist oriented international bankers control the American media, TV, radio, magazines, newspapers, etc. With this control, they paint a false picture about the Israeli state which is designed to get America into one of their planned wars in the Mideast (ibid, p. 2).
Subsequent chapters and Appendix D will address the 2002 and 2003 moves of the George W. Bush administration to do precisely this very thing--as the drums of war have been sounding quite loudly for more Bush wars in the Middle East. For sure, Jack Bernstein’s prediction could have much merit.
Jack and the Protocols
Jack Bernstein quoted the “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion” extensively (which will be more fully broached herein in a succeeding chapter). While many Jews argue the validity of the Protocols, Jack wrote in the vein that they represent truth and the efforts of Zionist and Zionist oriented international bankers to control the world.
As already noted earlier herein, whether the Protocols are a Jewish writing or not matters little in the long run--because they have been coming true in the last 100 years.
The most important Protocol quotations from Bernstein was the 7th and 12th Protocols which addressed Ashkenazi Jewish control of the media (ibid, p. 14-15).
In the 7th Protocol, Jack noted that it cited the power of the Jewish controlled press to stimulate public opinion and force the goyim governments to adopt measures which support the Jewish plans for world conquest. Jack says that since the Zionists control the press, they give out the news they wish--tell the truth, distort it, or omit it. He goes on to say that they found out the power of controlling the press.
Protocol number 12 also tackles the media question by focusing upon Jewish control over the news media and publishing only what the Jews allow. This Protocol also asserts that the Jews already dominate the minds of the goyim and only allow them to see world affairs through colored lenses, which the Jews place before their eyes.
Jack says yes that the Zionists manipulate the minds of the stupid goyim and the average stupid Jew as well. He charges that goyim and Jews will continue in this vacuum as long as they read the Washington Post, New York Times and other Zionist owned publications.
The Effect of This Media Control
The above comments of Rosenthal and Bernstein bring up another subject. A previous chapter discussed the Doctor Laura program and how incredibly deceptive it has turned out to be for the whole American conservative movement--involving both Christians and Jews. As outlined heretofore, Laura is either a racial-ethnic Amalekite; or she, as a minimum, is a janissary robot.
As reported earlier, a man named Richard Hoskins of Lynchburg, Virginia used (and defined) this janissary term in some of his writings long ago--which evidently focused upon Amalek-Edomite Jews or at least upon the controlled media and entertainment industries and how Amalekite Jews and government authorities have been able to completely change American values and beliefs in the last 70 years.
In the context of its use, a janissary is a person who is not an Amalekite racially or ethnically. But he or she has been trained, brainwashed, mesmerized and indoctrinated to blindly believe in, support, teach, advocate and push the Amalekite agenda for the destruction of true Israelites with the same dedication, purpose, resolve and commitment as a real Amalekite.
As established in the previous chapters on this line, a janissary is a robot or zombiized individual who has no mind of his own, but only functions in a state of confusion and daze of blindly following the Amalekites and their agenda--without the foggiest notion of what the result will ultimately be for him and his people.
A preceding chapter on media control, in the context of humanism, assessed more of the several factors at work in the modern House of Yisrael nations to turn the generic Israelite population into janissary robots who blindly follow the evil Amalekites down the road to Israelite destruction. These remarks do not need to be repeated here.
Of course, this motion is propelled primarily by the media and entertainment industries (which today, are essentially in Amalekite Jew hands, as outlined above). However, there are other influences at work as well to also push and prod this condition into being. These were assessed in the former chapters and/or will be addressed in the following presentations.
Dan Israel
In his book on “Christianity Unmasqued” (p. 233), writer Dan Israel quoted a 1928 statement to Americans made by an apparent Amalekite Khazar Jew named Marcus Eli Ravage. Marcus said “You make much noise and fury about the undue Jewish influence in your theaters and movie palaces. Very good; granted your complaint is well founded.
“But what is that compared to our staggering influence in your churches, your schools, your laws, and your governments, and the very thoughts you think every day.” Ravage was an honest and perceptive Jew who understood the reality of America--even as early as 1928. Imagine how this influence has accelerated in the early 21st century.
Chapter 451--Amalekites in Many Places
A Surprise
While the economic might and political strength of numerous Jews (like the Rothschilds and Lazards, who are evident Amalek-Edomites) are well known in New York, London and Hollywood, not much of the general public has been cognizant of the fact that many leading, supposed Christians are also Jews of sorts, like the popular Roosevelt (or correctly the Rosenfelds) family as well as George W. Bush and Slick Clinton, all cited earlier.
Even much evidence has surfaced indicating that the original Christian Rockefellers were Jews (if so, clearly Amalek-Edomites because of their great propensity for evil, money and power).
This Amalekite possibility has been borne out in the fact that in his early years old John D. Rockefeller was an agent and partner of the super rich Rothschild in 19th century America (“The Elite Serial killers of Lincoln, JFK, RFK & MLK,” p. 76).
Messianic Jew Len Horowitz of Sagle, Idaho (while on a Prophecy Club speaking tour) is quite precise on this linkage in saying that the Rothschilds provided the initial funding for old John D. Rockefeller in his early years.
Manifestly, there was an early connection between the two families.
However, at some point in time, the Rockefellers and Rothschilds drifted apart and actually became opponents and competitors of sorts (as described earlier and as will be further addressed in later comments)--although they may be coming back together here in the age end (as elsewhere discussed herein in the merger of Rockefellers’ Chase Manhattan Bank and the Rothschilds’ Morgan Bank).
A Revisit to Adolf Schicklgruber
And most surprising of all people, the hated Adolf Hitler fooled almost all of the world as to his true racial origin. As noted earlier, the well known and hated Adolf Hitler was not, racially, a German named Hitler at all.
As pointed out several times earlier herein, Adolf was a Jew (a Catholic Jew) whose real name was reportedly Adolf Schicklgruber (per articles in the “Encyclopedia Britannica,” the “Universal Jewish Encyclopedia” and other authoritative biographical sources). As noted, there are several reasons to believe that Adolf was totally a Jew with so-called Jewish blood from all directions.
There are manifest reasons to believe that Schicklgruber was an Amalek-Edomite as well and not a true Yehudi at all. He certainly had the marks, signs, fruits and works of the wicked Amalekites. So he must have been one of them. Yes, when something walks like a duck, quacks like a duck and looks like a duck; it must be a duck.
And while it might be impossible for a person to try to ascertain the motives that were present and lurking behind the scenes in the twisted mind of Adolf Schicklgruber to propel him on in his quest for domination over others, the fact of his racial ancestry could be material. What a tragedy it is that the world has come to believe that this "kook" was a German man.
Along with Adolf’s Jewish ancestry, it is fascinating that his personal astrologer, Erik J. Hanussen, was an (Amalekite, ed) Jew who was born in 1889 in Vienna, Austria as Hershel Steinschneider (“To Eliminate the Opiate,” v. II, p. 208). Evidently, he, like the Schicklgrubers, decided to change his name (which is a common Amalekite trick, as noted in former chapters herein).
More Surprises
For years, the number two man in George Lincoln Rockwell’s American Nazi Party was a Jew (actually a secret Amalekite).
A number of leading Ku Klux Klan officials have been Jews (correctly Amalek-Edomites)--like the Klan group in Bristol, Virginia in the 1980s and more recently, the neo-Nazi Knights of Freedom, headed by Davis Wolfgang Hawke, who is really an Amalekite Jew named Andy Greenbaum (many Klansmen are also federal agents as a matter of fact).
The Jul 19, 2002, “Forward” (p. 1. 8) had a story by Seamus McGraw on “Supremacist With a Secret Named in Boston Bomb Plot.” The focus of this report was upon the trial of Leo V. Felton, an alleged “White supremacist,” who had spent considerable time in mental hospitals. He was arrested in Boston in 2001 on allegations that he and his girlfriend “conspired” to blow up Jewish targets.
As it turned out, Felton was a son of a Negro man (who must have had many White genes) and a supposedly White Catholic nun who had turned to lesbianism. Besides being part Negro, the “Forward” story revealed that his lesbian mother was part Jewish (surely Amalekite, ed). Poor Felton was born into this world with many curses from his mixed genes--Negro, Amalekite and perhaps even some White majority genes.
This strange presence of evil Amalekites in the American right wing movements was addressed in previous chapters and/or will be further assessed in the following comments. In the case of these persons, just mentioned, one must remember the grant of rulership made to Yehudah’s line many centuries ago, to be assessed in succeeding chapters (Gen 49:10).
Another Surprise
Yuri Vladiminovich Andropov (previously mentioned) was another interesting person who spent much of his life in hatred and persecution of Jews. Andropov was head of the Soviet KGB for years and always seemed to be one of the important people in the USSR to be feared.
In November 1982, the ailing Leonid Brezhnev died as head man (General Secretary) of the Soviet Union. He was succeeded by the sinister Andropov who had made his mark as one of the primary opponents and persecutors of Soviet Jewry over many, many years. The primary benefit to the USSR Jews, on this succession, was that Andropov was old and in failing health.
He died on February 9, 1984--not really having the time in power to cause serious trouble for the Jews, as was anticipated. However, one of the fascinating features of Andropov’s profile paralleled that of Adolf Schicklgruber. Like Adolf, Andropov was ethnically a (supposed) Jew or more correctly an Eastern European, Khazar, Amalek-Edomite.
Arabs or Amalekites?
Beyond the Roosevelts, Rockefellers, some Bushes, Andropov and Schicklgruber, it is also most interesting that Yasser Arafat could correctly be called a Jew--actually a Moslem Jew (as pointed out earlier). Reportedly, Arafat’s mother was Jewish. Hence, by Jewish law, her son would legally be a Jew (at least genetically), but he took the Islamic religion of his Arab father.
Somehow, Arafat has maneuvered the Israeli government into paying him a personal grant of $8 million monthly that is deposited into his personal account with Bank Leumi which transfers it to Paris (Oct 29, 1999, “Forward,” p. 1). The Israelis are not exactly stupid. If they are paying Arafat $8 million monthly, one can be sure that they are getting something in return.
Is it possible that Arafat is double-crossing his Arab colleagues with this Israeli payoff? It could be! Also, despite his recent marriage to a Muslim woman, he is alleged to be a homosexual pervert (besides a first rate terrorist). All of this suggests that he is really an Amalekite, posing as a Muslim.
In 1972, athletes from all over the world congregated in Munich, Germany for the Twentieth Olympiad. While the games were in progress, the Arab terrorist group “Black September” seized some nine Israeli athletes and held them for 21 hours before eventually murdering them when they saw that Israel would not meet their demands and the Germans were moving against them.
The significant thing about this Arab terrorist group is that the head man of the involved team was correctly a Jew of sorts (that is--his mother was a Palestinian Jew and his father was a Moslem Arab). Of course, he identified with his Arab father with a passionate hatred toward the Jews.
Otherwise, serious questions over the Saudi Arabian royalty appear in an article by Vendyl Jones on “Who Was His Majesty King Hussein,” in the Jan-Mar 2000 “Petah Tikvah” magazine (p. 55-57). Mr Jones alleges that the Faisal family of Saudi Arabia was originally Edomite slaves in the ancient Hashemite kingdom which took over the Trans-Jordan in the 20th century.
Jones claims that when Lawrence of Arabia tied with the Arabs, the British created the kingdom of Saudi Arabia and gave it to the Emir Faisal I, who was a slave to the Hashemite ruler, Sharif Hussein bin Ali, Emir of Mecca.
In another interesting observation, Jones suggests that many of the Palestinian people now in the refugee camps are a mixture of the Ishmaelites (Arabs) and Amalekites. He adds that Jordan’s King Hussein knew how treacherous they were. Jones did not explain how or when this mixture took place. Presumably, it could go all of the way back to Second Temple days or it could have surfaced in more modern times.