EZEKIEL
and YHWH’s
Judgment
for the
Good News
PEOPLE
VOLUME XXX
War on Terrorism
EZEKIEL and YHWH’s
Judgment for the
Good News People
Volume XXX--War on Terrorism
by
an unworthy servant
And you shall know the truth,
and the truth will make you free.
(John 8:32)
Common Law Copyright, 2003 & 2005 CE, an unworthy servant, Calder, Idaho. The author claims his Right of exclusive ownership and control of this publication, the fruit of his labor, as a matter of Intellectual Property protected by the Laws of YHWH and as guaranteed by the US Constitution for the United States. Permission is granted to quote provided appropriate credit is cited together with the Publisher’s web site name and postal mailing address––WWW.AgeEnd.Com PO Box 473, Calder, ID 83808, USA.
Contents
Volume XXX--War on Terrorism
CHAPTER PAGE
- Cover Page 1
- Title Page 2
- Contents 3
- Publisher’s Preface 5
Part NNNN--Babylon and the Beast
469 Babylon and the Beast 6
470 War Means Profits 16
Part OOOO--War on Terrorism
471 War on Terrorism I 26
472 War on Terrorism II 36
473 War on Terrorism III 43
474 War on Terrorism IV 58
475 War on Terrorism V 70
476 Buying Allies 76
Part PPPP--More on 9-11
477 After 9-11 80
478 The Real Why for 9-11 90
479 More Plans for Tyranny 104
Part QQQQ--Iraq
480 Hitler of the Week 111
481 The Iraqi War I 117
482 The Iraqi War II 120
483 The Iraqi War III 127
484 The Iraqi War IV 133
485 The Iraqi War V 137
486 The Iraqi War VI 142
487 The Iraqi War VII 151
Part RRRR--Unplanned Trouble?
488 What May Happen 157
489 Some Views on the Bush War 165
SHEERIT YISRAEL
PO Box 473
Calder, Idaho 83808, USA
Publisher’s Preface
Greetings! The following presentation is volume thirty of a 36-volume production of some 6,000 pages on “Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good News People,” all of which is on the Internet at the www.AgeEnd.com web site.
This overall effort provides an interpretation of the Good News message in the New Testament, its linkage to the book of Ezekiel, and an application of both to the age-end prophecies relating to certain nations and peoples now out in the world. In order for this single volume to be understood and comprehended, it is imperative that the study be read from its beginning--from page one of volume one.
Anyone trying to read this volume or the study’s 6,000 pages at any mid-point will end up in a state of confusion without having read and digested the preceding material. It is crucially important that this work be read in sequence from its beginning--otherwise, the reader will almost certainly end up missing the essence of the message!
The effort was originally set on a Macintosh computer with Microsoft Word 6.0.1. It was set in Helvetica, 12-point type (18 pt on chapter headings); single line spacings; and margins: left 1.2”, right 0.8”, top 0.7”, bottom 0.8” and footer 0.6” (for page numbers).
For further information on obtaining this study in 18 computer floppy disks (IBM-formatted, high density, 2HD, 1.44 MB, 3 1/2 inches); in a single CD-Rom; or in hard copies (when the Internet or a compatible computer is not available); please write the publisher at the above address and send a stamped, self-addressed, long (legal-size), return envelope.
With a CD-Rom or computer floppy disks, the study is readable on Macintosh (systems 5.0 and later) or IBM/compatible (with Microsoft Word-Windows) personal computers. May The Great CREATOR and SOVEREIGN OF THE UNIVERSE bless you as you study His word to learn His will and to obey Him. Shalom (peace) to you and yours!
an unworthy servant, Hanukkah 2003 CE
Chapter 469--Babylon and the Beast
The Most Important Scriptural References
The Book has an enormous number of references pertinent to both Babylon and the Beast (in the prophetic sense). The sheer number of these remarks and the inherent personal limitations of this writer combine to make it extremely difficult to begin to cover these two supposedly separate parties or actors in any responsible and coherent way.
Actually, as will be shortly shown, it is a misnomer to address these two entities in a separate vein. Because, in fact, they are very close or almost one and the same.
Of course, Babylon, in its historic beginnings, was apparently a geographical reference to an area founded by the beast, rebel Nimrod--just after the flood.
Over the centuries, and despite its many ups and downs, Babylon gained some fame and notoriety in the 6th century BCE when Nebuchadnezzar came to power over the kingdom and began his conquest of the world--to include Palestine where the House of Yehudah was in power in Jerusalem.
After approximately a century of power and influence, Babylon passed off of the stage to be replaced by the Medeo-Persian empire. The Book seems to describe both the prophetic destruction of Babylon and the later actual event--at least, in an ante-typical fashion (Isa 47-48; Jer 50-51; Dan 5).
The End of Babylon?
Jeremiah 50:39 is especially relevant on this idea because it powerfully declares that Babylon, in her destruction, “shall be no more inhabited for ever.” For long centuries, Christian scholars and commentators looked upon this text as the historic end of Babylon. Many felt that Babylon could never be rebuilt.
In the 1930s and 1940s, radio preacher Herbert W. Armstrong (who was no scholar, but a very persuasive advertising man) seized upon Jeremiah 50:39 and some of the prevailing ideas to begin preaching that Babylon could never be rebuilt. Armstrong even used the concept as a proof of the Scriptures.
Well, the years passed, and sure enough, Armstrong and the many other procrastinators, who looked upon the end of Babylon, were themselves proven wrong when the modern nation of Iraq began to rebuild Babylon (primarily since 1980). This rebuilding process has intensified in the last several years because the former Iraqi leader, Saddam Hussein, likened himself to the historic ruler Nebuchadnezzar.
Interestingly, Armstrong and his Christian associates and colleagues should never have assumed the end of Babylon around 500 BCE. After all, there are an abundance of Scriptures describing its presence in the age end (like Rev 17-18). Assuredly, Babylon will one day end (when YESHUA returns and crushes it totally and completely). It just hasn’t ended yet (at least, not by early 2003).
More Than Just Land Area
Part of the difficulty in assessing Babylon is that Scripturally Babylon is more than just a geographical land area in the Middle East. True, the modern nation of Iraq occupies some part of the old Babylonian land area. But there is still more to the question. As discussed elsewhere herein, Babylon involves a system--a system made up of land, people, politics, commerce, trade, money, sociology, culture, etc.
Take, for instance, the former Babylonian people. The Scriptural evidence is that about the time of Nimrod, the kingdom was inhabited by Sabeans (or Sabines), who descended from Seba, the son of Cush, or possibly from Sheba, the grandson of Cush (“Young’s Analytical Concordance,” p. 829). The kingdom of Cush evidently started at the Euphrates (where the Cushite Nimrod lived) and extended West to Ethiopia.
With the fall of Babylon to the Medes and Persians, it seems that these Sabines left the area and moved West in the great disruption of kingdoms and movements of people out of the Middle East toward Europe (as discussed earlier herein).
In time, the Sabines settled Central Italy and eventually amalgamated (in the 3rd century CE) with surviving Romans (the Romans were apparently not Hamites, but evidently Shemites, possibly Israelites) and other peoples to become the modern Italians (“Concise Columbia Encyclopedia,” p. 740). But that’s only part of it.
Babylon was to become more than just a land area and people. Over the years, it evolved to encompass almost all facets of human existence--as found today in the present Western Christian civilization (just as Christianity has evolved, as discussed in former chapters).
In the 6th century BCE, the despot Nebuchadnezzar had almost the entire system put together; but not completely, since he did not totally rule the very minds, thoughts and thinking of people, as is happening in our time (with the new attention being placed on the thought police and thought crimes, as enunciated by Eric Blair in “1984”).
The Image
In any case, Nebuchadnezzar had a vision of his system and how it would evolve in the form of the great image of a humanoid character, as depicted in Daniel 2. This image had a head of gold, breast of silver, belly and thighs of brass and legs of iron and feet of a mix of iron and miry clay. The image was illustrative of all of the world’s governing kingdoms to persist until YESHUA returns to end man’s misrule of earth.
The head of gold was indicative of the Babylonian monetary system which was built on the use of gold (and silver to a lesser extent). Clay tablets found by archeologists readily confirm the obvious, as perceived from the Scriptures. The ancient Babylonian system was a capitalist system (similar in many ways to the modern US). Muscle and might were supplied by the military (an army of conquest and control).
Importantly, the kingdoms following ancient Babylon kept the essential system in tow and merely added to it or modified it slightly (thus, it has been evolving over the years). Certainly, the Medes and Persians used their military power to conquer and subdue other nations and to continue what Nebuchadnezzar had begun.
In the 4th century BCE, the Greeks came to power under Alexander the Great. The Grecian rule saw several new innovations. First, the ideas and concept of a democracy were introduced to the world (since the ancient Greeks had used this political system), although Alexander and his succeeding generals were imperial dictators who ruled by military might.
Next, though Nebuchadnezzar had successfully changed much of the thinking of the Jews when he conquered Jerusalem in his day (in money, commerce and economics; and in the use of Babylonian names and words to pay homage to the Babylonian gods), he really never accomplished much of anything with the Jews, in terms of their basic religion.
The Greek Push
But the Greeks had a new slant on religion with their many polytheistic gods. With the death of Alexander, his successors began an active campaign to force the conquered territories and peoples to adopt the Grecian language, names, culture, religion, policies, sociology, economics, commerce and trade (global), corporations, monetary practices, etc (in the form of the Western civilization).
While the Jews in Palestine didn’t submit to this Greek push (primarily because of the work of Judas Maccabees and the Hasmonian revolt which laid the groundwork for Hanukkah), the Greeks had much success elsewhere. Manifestly, the succeeding Roman Empire picked upon much of the thinking of the Greeks.
Rome adopted the role of gold, silver and capitalism (from Babylon) and global commerce and trade (to include the use of corporations, from the Greeks), culture, and language (from the Greeks). However, Rome offered a slight twist on the religion question. Imperial Rome never tried to force a particular religious belief on the empire (this would change with the later Roman Catholic Church).
Imperial Rome seemed to allow some measure of religious freedom--but always, in the vein that whatever religion prevailed, it had to exist on the premise that all of the diversified religions were valid and proper expressions of worship. It was this Roman system which has become the model now being followed in the religious world of ecumenicalism (as noted earlier and to be further addressed below).
The Beast
Importantly, Daniel 7 broaches the subject of the Beast governments and system in some detail. Daniel 8 follows up with another definition of governmental powers and rulership. Though Daniel does not directly link his various beasts to the four divisions of the image outlined in Daniel 2, this reality has become manifest with the passage of the years and the ensuing record of human history.
In other words, the various beasts of Daniel can be linked to the image seen and all of them can be identified upon an analysis of world history and the various succeeding world governments.
In looking at these beasts, it must be noted that their heads add up to seven (the lion, bear and indescribable fourth one have one each and the leopard has four). By tying this seven heads to the stipulated ten horns (Dan 7:7), one has a unique set of definitions which seem to reappear in Revelation 12:3; 13:1; and 17:3.
Not only does the Revelator Yohanan report upon the numbers seven and ten, but he goes further in Revelation 13:2 by linking the beasts of Daniel to the beast coming up from the sea at Revelation 13:1. Thus, as the “Concordant Commentary of the New Testament” (p. 396) concludes, Yohanan’s beast from the sea is a composite of the beasts of Daniel. This source also links the sea to the abyss (Rev 9).
The book of Revelation seems to connect the whole system together in chapters 17 and 18 where Yohanan ties Mystery Babylon to a beast--specifically a scarlet colored one (Rev 17:3). In “The Greek Testament” (v. 4, p. 706), Dr Henry Alford makes the case that the description of this beast in Revelation 17 makes it plain that it is the same one as in Revelation 13:1 which reflects the indescribable fourth beast of Daniel 7.
As pointed out earlier herein, the woman sits over many waters (people) and on the beast. Revelation 17:5 suggests that the woman is “Mystery Babylon the Great,” although Revelation 18 carries the context forward in the sense that the subject is the historic “Babylon the Great.” Possibly, the answer here is that the woman is virtually synonymous with “Babylon the Great,” at least as Yohanan saw her in vision.
The point of this seems to be that the image seen by Nebuchadnezzar, the beasts of Daniel 7-8, the beast of Revelation 13 and 17 and the harlot woman and her whore daughters of Revelation 17 all tie to Scriptural Babylon as she has been manifested over the years (in Isa, Jer and Rev 18). Again, Revelation 18 proves that her destiny is still in progress as these lines are being written in 2003.
The Role of Religion
The importance of this conglomeration is that the miry clay in the toes of the image seen by Nebuchadnezzar and present with the woman riding the beast in Revelation 17 is religion.
Yes, it is religion which holds the whole system together (as was commented upon in preceding chapters). The beast is a confederation of activities (political, economic, monetary, social, cultural, etc), but the whole mass is held together by religion.
Manifestly, the old, capitalistic sun cults, persisting in the Babylonian, Medeo-Persian, Grecian and Roman civilizations, have been carried forward into world dominating Christianity for at least the last 1,700 years (if not the last 1,960 years, since her inception by Simon Magus and Apollonius of Tyana in the first century CE).
With the evolution of this system, all of the wrongs introduced by ancient Babylon, Medeo-Persia, Greece and Rome have been perpetuated by Adamic man. And now, in the early 21st century CE, the role of thought crimes has been added to top off the multitude of depravity this system promotes. Yes, this Babylonian system has reached the pinnacle of success in attempting to control the very thoughts of people.
Of course, religion has not been the only ingredient holding the system together. From the time of Nebuchadnezzar forward to our times, the system has always had military power and muscle to employ on the conquered nations and peoples, if necessary. Even under the rule of the old Holy Roman Empire, the pope routinely and regularly had the military forces of his subordinates to clamp down on any dissidents.
The extreme importance of religion in this system was brought out by A. E. Knoch in his “Concordant Commentary on the New Testament” (p. 396). As Knoch wrote, worship, rather than rule, is the dominant note here. Knoch went on to conclude that these beasts bring a confederation bound by a common religion.
There is no need for expensive standing armies if a governing power has the benefit of a cohesive, powerful, ruling religion. So religion has been the focus, certainly since the fall of old, pagan Rome and its successors in the vein of the Holy Roman Empire. Obviously, the system Yohanan beheld in Revelation 17 and 18 will use religion extensively in exercising dictatorial control over the peoples of the world.
More on the Evolution of this System
As this system seems to be evolving, there have been some very interesting modifications which need to be recalled here. As commented upon in the previous chapters on the “The Murderers of YESHUA,” there seems to have been a development of a plutocratic money power even in the old Roman Empire. The evidence is that it was in Amalekite hands from day one.
When the Holy Roman Empire came on the stage after Constantine, and until its demise during the Protestant Reformation, it’s hard to say to what extent the plutocrats ruled. The Roman Church may have allowed some of them to be present, but only if they toed the line with Rome (and made many bribes and payoffs to the Catholic Church).
For sure, the Amalekite bankers had a hard road to travel in those days because many European countries either ran the Jews out or they imposed enormous restrictions on Jews. However, by the time of the Protestant Reformation, things began to loosen up considerably for the Amalekite plutocrats. Clearly, in the 18th century, the Rothschilds had emerged as a source of great power in Germany.
Corporations
While the corporate form of business organization started in ancient, sun worshipping Greece, the world was not totally obsessed in ancient times with huge multi-national and conglomerate corporations (as has happened today).
Again, when the Catholic Church ruled the roost, she wouldn’t tolerate any competition from giant corporations, which might have impeded upon her rule. If any existed, they had to make large pay-offs to Rome to stay in business.
But ever since the days of Nebuchadnezzar, the world has been plagued with the greed, get and acquire mentality of the capitalist society. While the question of private ownership of property is clearly a Scriptural teaching, the role of giant, greedy businesses (whether incorporated or however organized) is simply not Scriptural.
Now though, in the 20th and 21st centuries, there has been some modifications in this arrangement. For instance, the 20th century saw the rise of Fascism and Nazism where capitalism has been allowed to exist, but under strict government control and supervision. For the super rich plutocrats (who owned the giant corporations and also controlled the governments), this was no problem.
Another ism arising in the late 19th century and early 20th century has been Communism where government takes over everything--business, people, education, etc. Whether Communism is totally out or not is debatable (this writer suspects it will still have a limited, short-term comeback). Anyway, it has been important historically.
Socialism
Moreover, there has been the surfacing of a number of various socialist parties-- primarily in Europe; but also, de-facto in America and the rest of the White British Commonwealth countries. This socialist movement seems to be progressing in the context of International Socialism (which may be the ruling political belief in the future).
Through the years, and especially in the US, Fascism has been increasingly added to this International Socialism mix (though few, if any, political scientists would admit it). Thus, modern Socialism seems to be allowing capitalism to exist (in the form of giant, multi-national corporations), but almost all other activities are being placed into the hands of socialistic, government bureaucrats.
The sociology of the US, White British Commonwealth and much of Europe is plainly in the hands of socialists--in education, schools, entertainment and media institutions, etc. Even religion is taking a turn toward Socialism in the vein that all religions are equally proper and good (as apparently happened somewhat in the old Roman Empire).
Though there are dedicated socialists, super rich plutocrats, misinformed humanists, greedy businesses and corporations, ruthless gangsters and so forth all around and all busy trying to impose the new world order; surely, this coming world government system will not become reality unless and until religion makes it possible. Religion must and will lead the way--as Revelation 17 suggests.
The Religion Dilemma
For at least 1,700 years, the Catholic Christian Church tried to impose a one world religious system on Adam man by the use of sheer strength and force. Military armies, police and the powers of secular states were available and called upon by Rome to try to make everyone toe the line. In her greatest act of tyranny, Rome imposed the Catholic Inquisition to torture and murder millions in an effort to keep them in line.
But because of the work of John Huss, Martin Luther and numerous other reformers, whole populations of people in Northwest Europe began to wake up and realize that they were on a wrong ship (in the Roman Catholic Church). Multitudes were ready and willing to die in order to experience religious freedom.
The Catholic Church lost the battle to keep the people in line and especially as the Scriptures were translated into the vernacular in a number of countries. But despite this loss, Rome has always been in the background, working and pulling strings, in an effort to bring the daughter churches back to mother Rome. So far, this effort too has failed, though progress is being made today with the Christian ecumenical motion.
Since all of these systems and activities on-going at all levels are being directed and managed from behind the scenes by Satan and his demonic helpers, it is clear that something different from torture racks and burning people at the stake was needed to bring about a one world state.
Apparently, to deal with the problems, the present motion for world government has turned to the old, pagan Rome model where the state was fairly tolerant of all religions--if they treated each other as equals and paid homage, where necessary, to the state approved gods and deities.
And that’s precisely what is now unfolding on the global religious scene. All faiths are acceptable and can exist--providing that they toe the line on toleration toward other faiths and acceptance of all of the state approved social gods (which have been defined previously herein in the vein of racial integration and amalgamation, homosexuality, feminism, abortion on demand, etc).
Of course, the difficulty here surfaces for those sects and groups which actually have some measure of faith and belief in their religions. Essentially, these groups might be classified as the more fundamentalist types. Thus, we have sincere Christians, Jews, Muslims, etc who take their religions seriously and in the vein that their faith is the only way for morality and an after-life.
Yes, Fundamentalism
Manifestly, this type of religious fundamentalism surfaces regularly as news items in newspapers and on TV from time to time. Here, the focus has been on the Branch Davidians, most of the Sardis types (the Sacred Namers and much of the fall out from the old Church of God, Seventh Day), most of the Christian Identity movement, and even segments of other churches and groups that tend to be fundamentalists.
These fundamentalists believe that their faiths alone have the answers to morality and the afterlife and that other faiths and beliefs are lacking and/or are false. Also, many of these groups are not going to willingly accept all of the social gods being forced upon the people by the dictatorial state. Hence, there are problems within Christianity.
The same thing can be said for the Jews in the development of Ultra Orthodox sects and groups which are extremely dedicated and sincere in their faith. These people are not going to compromise their faith and belief without a fight (as discussed earlier).
Moreover, the same thing is happening among other religions and particularly in the Moslem world. Islamic fundamentalists are surfacing with regularity (involving people like Osama bin Laden, the Taliban in Afghanistan and the clerics in Iran and Pakistan). These people, too, seem to be extremely sincere and uncompromising in their faith.
One of the primary features of most of these fundamentalists is their unwillingness to compromise their individual faiths in order to have fellowship and goodwill with the developing ecumenical one world religion and its social gods (now coming together in all of the world’s major religions).
Coming Trouble
Many of these fundamentalist groups might could exist for awhile (in the New World Order) if they maintain an extremely low profile and keep their faith secret (if that is possible). But once the word is out that one of these groups is “different” and refuses to accept all of the New World Order gods and refuses to be acceptable and tolerant of other faiths, they are in trouble.
Previous chapters have mentioned the situation with the Ultra Orthodox, Christian Identity, Branch Davidians and Taliban in Afghanistan. The thing that has hurt all of these groups is that they have refused to accept the politically correct social gods of the New World Order. Too, they have not shown a willingness to worship/agree with the mainstream religions.
There is no point now in (re)addressing the Branch Davidians for wanting to own guns, the Ultra Orthodox Jews for refusing to pay homage to the so-called Holocaust, or the Christian Identity sects for being paranoid over the Jews. The situation with the Taliban in Afghanistan was only briefly cited a few times in terms of some of their beliefs.
These Taliban Muslim fundamentalists got themselves into trouble in several areas. First, they removed women from power and authority over men and made women wear veils (both of these actions are consistent with the Scriptures). Next, they expressed their disdain for queers and faggots (which was a very good Scriptural move).
Finally, they tore down some ancient statutes of Buddha (which, by the way, just happens to coincide with a mitzwah in the Torah). Frankly, this writer has a great love for history and ancient things (artifacts, remains, monuments, etc). However, there is a mitzwah commanding the destruction of these pagan gods. So it is difficult to condemn or criticize the Taliban over their religious efforts.
Yes, Trouble for the Non-Conformists
As already described heretofore, all of these groups and their allies and cousins in the generic fundamentalist motions have been in trouble with the secular states and the move to impose the New World Order. More trouble is coming for all religious beliefs which do not toe the line on religious ecumenicalism.
“The Tzemach Letter” (p. 10 for Oct 2001) had an article by Ken Garrison on “America under Attack or War between Principalities?” which focused upon the dilemma facing people who are serious and committed on their religions. Garrison suggested that the coming beast anticipated in the book of Revelation will be “religious in nature.”
He said that he believed that “it is very likely that such a religious beast will emerge from this present crises. Religious expression will be acceptable as long as it only deals with questions of moral lifestyle and the afterlife. Any religious expression which has geographical, political implications will be forbidden. The immediate application of this will be toward Fundamentalist Islam, however, Fundamentalist Christians and Jews will be close behind...”
Frankly, the writer of this study has some agreement with Garrison. Possibly, Garrison may not have it all right, but he makes some good points.
His primary problem area probably surfaces in his conclusion that a religion can be acceptable as long as it deals with questions of moral lifestyles. Actually, the evidence so far seems to suggest that certain fundamentalists are in conflict with the New World Order social gods precisely on morality and lifestyle issues. And this really gets them into trouble with the New World Order crowd.
Most all of these fundamentalist groups are strongly opposed to homosexuality and perversion, in all of their sordid forms. Once a group speaks out and condemns the prevalent sin found in the secular society, the New World Order people are then ready to pounce on the group and destroy it.
Scriptural Morality Is Under Assault
Scriptural morality, righteousness and human lifestyles are all under enormous assault with the new social gods defined as being politically correct in the various secular states. Any person or any group which refuses to accept any or all of these definitions are automatically enemies of the state and are marked for destruction.
Of course, most secularized religions (i.e. the Roman Catholic Church, most of the Protestants, mainstream Islam, Reform Jews, etc) will gladly compromise their faiths on all of these issues (actually, they have already compromised their faiths with the acceptance of these social gods producing social sin).
Mainstream religions, right and left, are not only accepting the New World Order social gods (racial integration and amalgamation, sexual perversion, feminism, abortions on demand, etc) but they have gone even further by showing a willingness to participate in joint religious worship ceremonies. Ecumenicalism, toleration and acceptance are the norms for today’s religious people.
Obviously, true fundamentalists of whatever kind are not going to go along with this trash and Satanic evil being forced upon the world. Many groups will fight first. And this idea opens the door to the reality that the state will murder and destroy them (with no discrimination, since Fundamentalist Christians, Jews, Muslims and so forth will all have to toe the line or face destruction).
Manifestly, the Christian Identity people, many of the Sardis groups, Ultra Orthodox Jews and Muslim fundamentalists all face trouble and trying days over their faiths.
Chapter 470--War Means Profits
The Need for War
It goes without saying that enormous pressures have been building up over the years for more and more wars, military conflicts and political intrigues to bring about world government. Surely, Satan and his demonic assistants have been at this business for quite some time now. Religious leaders, misinformed humanitarians and super rich plutocrats have all been making their plays to rule the world.
For the dark ages, it was mad Catholic monks and leaders who used military forces to conquer and subdue others in the vein of religion. With the Protestant Reformation, the plutocrats moved on stage to become the primary agency for conquest and domination. The Amalekite Jew bankers/masters have risen to the top in the Christian West to exert most of the influence in this arena since WWII.
Marine General Smedley Darlington Butler was quoted earlier when he outlined his personal knowledge of the plutocratic use of the US military in the 20th century, up until WWII. In his book “War is a Racket” (p. 1-2), he noted that only a small group of people on the inside understand what it is all about.
Butler (p. 8, 12-13) said that war “is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.” As the general noted, some 21,000 new millionaires and billionaires were made in America in WWI. While soldiers on the front lines might be making $20 a month, American business men were making vast profits of 20% to 1800%.
Profits
With this opportunity to make such huge profits and gains, US businessmen (who own the factories, businesses, etc that will provide the means to conduct the war) are always anxious, per Butler, for another war. When one war ends, these fat cats begin making plans for the next one. It is clear why these big shots are so anxious to make patriotic speeches and spur the nation on to war.
Actually, the same motion has been underway since the so-called war to end all wars (was that WWI or WWII? In truth, both of these wars were fought to supposedly end all future wars).
But since WWII, the role of war has increased dramatically. And the plutocrats clearly have found since 1945 their greatest ambitions in using the US military to make money and dominate the world. Naturally, prostitute politicians have gladly went along with this effort to gain political contributions which insure their reelection at the next voting time.
In terms of the US preparation for a war against Iraq, the Jan 6 & 13, 2003, “American Free Press” (p. 1) had a story by Ken Nichols O’Keefe on “Anti-War Protesters Risk Lives to Block Bombing of Baghdad” which focused upon O’Keefe and others who said that they would go to Iraq to be human shields against incoming US bombs.
O’Keefe added: “Those who suffer the most will be the innocent men, women and children in Iraq. Their crime? Simply being the powerless citizens of an oil-rich nation with a leader who no longer fulfills the needs of the Western powers that supported and armed him in the past.” Yes, that’s what it is all about. The US-Iraqi war development will be covered in future chapters.
Without taking the time to go over the multitudes of past wars, military activities and engagements since WWII (some of these have already been written on at length), one of the more recent US wars (before Iraq) will be highlighted and discussed in the following presentation to demonstrate how things can happen.
Reasons for the 1999 US War in the Balkans
Here, Clinton’s US war, on the Serbs, in the Balkans, in the spring of 1999, needs mention. The US launched her attack on March 24, 1999, and pushed it to the extreme until the plutocrats’ immediate goals and objectives were largely met.
Apparently, several things seem to have come together to precipitate the Clinton decision to commence acts of war against Yugoslavia. First, Yugoslavia was a small, insignificant country with no means to defend itself against a vastly superior US attack (hence, victory seemed certain--the US plutocrats love such wars against nations which cannot defend themselves).
Another key reason was that the war would help Slick’s legacy and his desire to emulate Franklin Roosevelt and WWII. Clearly, a Balkans war might could help fuel WWIII as the US pressed the Serbs and their Russian allies.
One more primary reason was the recent revelations of Red China’s penetration of the US defense establishment and the US White House--for campaign contributions to Slick Clinton in 1996.
Slick seemed to use acts of war against others as diversionary actions to take the gullible public’s mind off of him and his scandals and focus them on some external foe, like Saddam Hussein, and then on Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic (who he had labeled as another Hitler).
Too, acts of war benefit the bankers and industrialists in the military industrial complex (each cruise missile fired costs the US $1 million). As was discussed by Major General Smedley Butler, quoted above and earlier, US wars have traditionally been fought to make money for American businessmen. Wars can be enormously profitable!
More Reasons
Next, Amalekite plutocratic bankers have had their eyes set upon taking over Eastern Europe and exploiting and stealing everything possible there for quite some time now. Obviously, they have had their eyes set upon Yugoslavia where Yugoslavian President Milosevic had not cooperated in their take-over. With his consistent refusal to surrender to the Amalekite bankers, he had to go!
After some bombing and killing of people, the bankers can more easily move in and take over and particularly as they accompany NATO peace-keepers (Amalekite parasites and carpetbaggers have been following conquering armies into defeated nations for over 2,500 years--starting with the Babylonian entrance into Jerusalem in 554 BCE, into the American South with Grant’s army in the Civil War, into Germany and Japan after WWII and so forth).
There are a lot of valuable mineral deposits in the Balkans and particularly Kosovo which could be exploited by the fat cats if Milosevic would have been disciplined to accept the plutocrat takeover. If he wouldn’t agree to the banker take-over, there was always the option of taking him out completely (which is what ultimately happened).
Race
There was another important reason for Slick’s war against the Serbs. Howbeit, it is more subtle than some of the others. There is a racial dimension in that the attack would benefit the Albanian cousins (from Esau and Eliphaz) of America’s ruling Amalekites.
Edomites from Eliphaz are extremely clannish people and try to stick together. The racial factor is the reason why Irish Phoenicians (like conservative, radio talk show host G. Gordon Liddy) supported Slick’s war against the Serbs.
The Media
Since the US Amalekite-controlled media was pro-Albanian, the poor Serbs never had a chance to have their view presented.
Daily, the American people were told how evil the Serbs were and how Yugoslav President Milosevic was another Hitler (when, in fact, Slick has far more in common with Adolf Schicklgruber than anyone else in modern times). If NATO bombed and murdered dozens of Albanian women and children, the pro-Edomite media would bombard the airways with stories of how the Serbs caused the deaths.
Importantly, the just cited Adolf Schicklgruber discovered years ago that if a lie is told repeatedly to gullible people--soon the people will believe the lie and regardless of how stupid it is.
This happened daily with Slick’s press releases and press statements and how the media told lies, over and over, to make out that Milosevic was a war criminal guilty of gross atrocities (when, in truth, it was really Slick Clinton and Britain’s Tony Blair who were committing the atrocities).
Still More Reasons
There is one more profound reason for Clinton’s war on Yugoslavia--although it did not immediately become manifest to the public.
The April 1999 “America’s Promise” newsletter (p. 4) quoted Dr John Coleman and the Wall Street Journal of September 9, 1985, with remarks on the movement of 25-40% of the US heroin supply from Turkey through the Balkans to Albanian Mafiosi gangsters in New York.
With the prevailing racial factor, it is clear that the Edomite Albanians would be working with Edomite Turks, Edomite Sicilian gangsters and Amalek-Edomite bankers/masters to operate the heroin pipeline. Reportedly, Milosevic had been trying to clean the drug problem up in Kosovo. So the drug running Edomite Albanians there had been trying to break free of his control.
As the article noted, the Clinton plan of partial autonomy for the Kosovo Albanians (with their KLA revolutionaries) all but guaranteed that the province “will find itself controlled by the gunmen of an international drug-dealing Mafia masquerading as an idealistic liberation army.” Apparently, the Milosevic efforts to close this drug pipeline down was motivated by Serbian defense considerations.
The “Washington Times” (Jun 7-13, 1999, p. 22) had an AP story by Jerry Seper on “KLA buys advanced arms with illicit funds, report says.” This story focused on a NATO report which revealed that the KLA was pushing Middle East heroin on the US and Western European markets in order to raise large sums of drug money to buy advanced weapons for its war against Yugoslavia.
As established in former comments herein, the druggy Slick Clinton had close ties to the US drug trade while Governor of Arkansas and after he was in the White House. It was entirely logical that he would act militarily to keep the drug flow intact.
The Opportunity Was Clear
Since Milosevic was bogged down in a war of nationalism with Edomite, Albanian, Muslim separatists in his Kosovo province, here was the perfect opportunity for the plutocrats to attack Yugoslavia, destroy Milosevic and install a president who would conform to the New World Order. Several advantages were clear--viz:
First, the plutocrats would be able to move in on Yugoslavia like a bunch of leeches to steal everything that they have had their eyes set upon. Next, the Albanian Edomite drug traffickers would be able to continue moving Edomite heroin from out of the Middle East to markets in Europe and North America. Since Milosevic had the gall to try to shut this drug pipeline down, he could be shutdown.
Because the plutocrats are virtually all internationalists and since they have been working overtime to bring in the New World Order, the destruction of Milosevic and his Serbian power base would bring extra benefits. The Serbs are fierce nationalists and much of the conflict with the Edomite Albanians has been predicated upon Serb nationalism (involving racial, ethnic and religious dimensions).
Manifestly, the plutocrats and their prostitute politician, Bill “Slick” Clinton, must have licked their lips when they saw an opportunity to rush in and kill several birds with one stone. The destruction of Milosevic and his Serbian power base would fulfill the greatest of ambitions on Wall Street and in London and Switzerland (plus, it would be a shot in the arm for Clinton and his struggles over the Monica Lewinsky affair).
Clinton Attacked
The US launched her 1999 air assault against Yugoslavia in an attempt to ostensibly force Yugoslavia to accept US and NATO “peace-keeping” forces in her internal province of Kosovo, to join US “peace-keeping” forces in Bosnia and elsewhere in the Balkans.
The US attack on the Serb military seems to have resembled the situation in 1941 when the Japanese conducted an air assault on the US military at Pearl Harbor. In typical Christian fashion, Christian Americans began bombing and killing their fellow Christian Serbs.
The Serbs responded by increasing their attacks upon the revolutionary Moslem Albanians in Kosovo, who had been attempting to break off from Yugoslavia. The Kosovo rebellion was led by the 100,000 man Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) which was and is allied with the Arab terrorist leader Osama bin Laden and other Middle East terrorist groups (May 1999 “McAlvany Intelligence Advisor,” p. 3).
The US action placed America in league with her sworn enemy Osama, the accused bomber of the US embassy in Africa and the later assaults on September 11, 2001, on the Pentagon and World Trade Center (which will be discussed in detail in the succeeding chapters).
And More
Though Russia has a huge Assyrian population in its White Russian-Germanic segment, she is essentially a Slavic-Orthodox-Cyrillic-Japheth nation. Thus, she was and is strongly pro-Serb (which is also a Slavic-Orthodox-Cyrillic-Japheth entity) and has been much opposed to the continuing US actions in the Balkans that are anti-Serb.
Russian President Boris Yeltsin in the spring of 1999 warned of a possible global war. Prime Minister Primakov (who later lost his job on May 12, 1999) canceled a trip to the US and instead went to Yugoslavia.
Soon, Russia began her own deployment of ships to the Adriatic Sea and limited support operations for the Serbs (although she was restrained and held back by the IMF and big banks because of having to re-negotiate much of her international debt in April 1999). When America is under later attack, will Americans be able to understand why?
Greece and the other Orthodox nations were and are pro-Serb. Will the Balkans’ problem and the US presence there eventually throw Greece into the Russian sphere of influence? Will Greece be encouraged to eventually become one of the horns in the Russian led age end alliance against the US?
Will the Balkans’ war also precipitate new conflicts between Greece (from Japheth-Javan) and Turkey (from Esau-Eliphaz), like in Cyprus?
Even many Italians (most modern Italians are racially Hamitic Babylonians, although Sicilians and some Southern Italians seem to be Edomites from Eliphaz) disapproved of the attack. Will this US-British aggression ultimately bring on a split in NATO and pave the way for NATO to be dissolved (with its European fragments being consolidated into a new United Europe army)?
Anti-US protests and violence soon commenced in Macedonia, Russia, Greece, Italy and other parts of the world. WWI started in the Balkans in 1914. Will history repeat itself at some point in time?
More Adverse Fall-Out
News reports said that Yugoslavia coordinated her defense tactics against the US attacks with Iraq, which had had much experience over the last several years (discussed on the Rush Limbaugh program). This means that the Arab Moslems of Iraq had far more in common with the Orthodox Serbs than they did with their Muslim Albanian friends.
In other words, the enemy of Serbia was the enemy of Iraq--which meant that the two nations could be friends against their common enemy. Since Russia has been the power broker behind both Serbia and Iraq, it is no surprise that these three powers were and are coming together. No wonder hate against Americans is spreading worldwide.
The US attacks on Kosovo, coupled with the efforts of the Serbs to expel ethnic Albanians from Kosovo, created a condition where hundreds of thousands of Muslim Albanians fled the province for nearby Macedonia, Montenegro and Albania, completely flooding those countries with people.
To relieve the burden, the US and some of her European allies agreed to accept thousands of displaced Albanian refugees. This whole situation appears to be extremely prophetic for the people of the US and White British Commonwealth.
Yes--Prophetic
Per the Tanakh, the days are coming (in Yechezkel’s 32d-33d years) when multitudes of ethnic Anglo-Saxon-Celtic peoples will be forced from their lands to go into exile (and slavery) throughout the world. Since President Slick Clinton created the whole dilemma in Kosovo and since the American people sat back and allowed him to cause the crisis, the chickens will soon come home to roost.
American people (those that survive WWIII) will be expelled from their lands similar in some ways to what the Muslims and later the Serbs have experienced in Kosovo. The primary difference between the expulsions is that the Anglo-Saxon-Celtics will go into another Egyptian servitude and bondage.
Just as American war planes on several occasions attacked and killed Albanian Edomites trying to escape Kosovo, the same thing will apparently happen to Americans trying to escape their doomed land. They will be attacked and murdered by enemy air strikes.
During the Balkans’ war, on April 15, 1999, the FBI warned the US military and other sensitive federal installations that the Serbs may launch terrorist attacks against them in the US, based upon a memo circulated in the US Serbian Orthodox Church urging Serbian Americans to respond violently to the American attacks in the Balkans (Apr 15, 1999, “Spokesman-Review,” p. A13).
The same possibilities also exist with the Russians and Greeks and especially as the US presence in the Balkans drags on.
More US Trouble
On May 8, 1999, the US bombed the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, killing three and injuring many others. Chinese citizens retaliated by attacking the American embassy in Beijing for days. This US attack on the Chinese will not be forgotten. The Chinese have a long memory span. Will Americans understand when Chinese missiles start falling on American cities? There is a cause and effect relationship in matters like this.
The following May 27, 1999, the US and Britain pushed the International Criminal Tribunal in the Hague, Netherlands, to indict Yugoslavia President Milosevic and certain other leading Serbs as war criminals (eventually, Milosevic was arrested and shipped off to Holland to stand trail for his alleged war crimes).
While Slick Clinton and Tony Blair murdered far more innocent people in their aggression against Yugoslavia, it is interesting that the Hague decided to indict the Yugoslavians who have done little or nothing comparatively. Whether many of the Serbs will ever be arrested and tried remains questionable (beyond Milosevic).
As a follow-up, in order to do Milosevic in, the US offered a $5 million dollar reward for him in conjunction with using the CIA to commence student unrest in Belgrade in late June and July of 1999.
In any case, Slick and Tony made a mistake because when the conquering Russians, Chinese, etc arrive in Washington and London, they will arrest American and British politicians, right and left, and try and execute them for war crimes and crimes against so-called humanity. The chickens will surely come home to roost with both Slick and Tony Blair (and George W. Bush will face these same problems as well).
Russia, Boxed In
This strange turn of events made some ask why Russia would effectively abandon her Serb allies to essentially support the last NATO ultimatum on Kosovo (which was considerably changed from its first ultimatum). The answer seemed to lie in Russian attempts to re-negotiate outstanding IMF and big bank loans which were due in April 1999.
It appears that the Amalekite international financiers held Russia in hostage, preventing her from doing much in open support of the Serbs, and tied the loan re-negotiations into Russia’s role of forcing the Serbs to accept the NATO demands--although denied by US officials and super rich Amalekite bankers (this option was mentioned by Thomas Omestad and Alan Cooperman in their article on “ A minuet with Moscow, then a yes in Belgrade,” in the Jun 14, 1999, “US News & World Report,” p. 33).
But Moscow will not forget her humiliation and being blackmailed by the super rich bankers. Thus, the whole US role in the Balkans is not helping relations with Russia and the East. With US troops in Bosnia and now Kosovo, coupled with Russian troops also now in Bosnia and Kosovo, the stage is set for a major power conflict.
Clearly, it seems that the US-British attacks and partisanship in the Balkans will be one of the catalysts to bring on the Russian-Third World destruction of the US and her Anglo-Saxon-Celtic cousins in WWIII.
The Cease Fire
Based on Russian and Finnish negotiations with Milosevic on June 8, 1999, and the secret behind the scenes maneuvering of international financier Peter Castenfelt (discussed heretofore), the G-8 nations (the largest and most powerful, including Russia) met in Germany and agreed on a format to end the US led bombing assault upon Yugoslavia if the Serbs would accept an international peace-keeping force (not just NATO, as was originally stipulated) which would move into Kosovo with the departure of the Serbian forces.
On June 9, 1999, Serb and NATO representatives met and signed an agreement for the Serb army to withdraw from Kosovo and for the UN to approve a peacekeeping force to enter Kosovo. The peace-keeping force turned out to be an international force, including Russian soldiers.
By June 10, 1999, the Serb withdrawal from Kosovo commenced and the NATO bombing was halted.
Since the US had expended many of her cruise missiles and other key armament inventories in attacks upon Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and Iraq (reportedly, with only limited new production schedules in the pipeline), what will she do when WWIII strikes and she no longer has a large defense arsenal (and particularly, if the dollar tanks in the coming days)?
Not only did Slick Clinton draw down the US military in his years in office, but also, he steadily used up US defense armaments in his various military excursions around the world without replacements (61 Clinton wars involving US forces occurred by early 1999). Morale plummeted in the US military and experienced people wanted out. Too, the Clinton penchant for war has continued with GWB to add to the problem.
Another Possibility
The efforts of the US and Britain to enter Kosovo on the ground, and the reality that much of their cruise missile and bomb inventories were used up without replenishment (and especially, in the Afghanistan and Iraq wars in 2001-2003), brought up another interesting possibility.
Instead of continuing to surrender, what if some of the Yugoslavians choose to fight the US and British peace-keeping forces as guerrillas and snipers over the coming months? Actually, the Serb forces have kept a low profile since the US war. So far, they have not attempted any attacks on US peace-keepers (as of early 2003). But this option remains on the table in future days (as is happening in Afghanistan and Iraq).
There is also the problem of the KLA which will probably never disarm, nor will NATO require them to do so since the Amalekite bankers/masters are in control of NATO forces and are very much pro-Edomite (for their drug running operations, among other reasons).
In any case, the armed Kosovo Edomites did assuredly begin attacking and killing unarmed Serb people (to force them out of Kosovo) and NATO never stopped it. What if Russia (with their forces also on the ground in Kosovo) eventually intervenes on the side of the Serbs? Or what will happen if Russian and US-British forces get into some other confrontation in the Balkans?
Coming Judgment
What then will the US and Britain do in later years if and when they face a superior Russian, Chinese and Third World force which clearly has YHWH on their side?
When WWIII comes, guess who the good guys will be and who the bad guys will be? What a shock it will be to apathetic and indifferent Americans and Britons when they learn that YHWH is against them and has chosen to execute judgment upon them for their sins and wretchedness.
Chapter 471--War on Terrorism I
The Revelation
The Bush War on Terrorism is another recent war needing mention (as suggested in the prior chapters). It will be addressed at this time.
As will be covered in comments to follow, there were a series of events which preceded the so-called terrorists attacks in Washington and New York on September 11, 2001. Later, various magazines and newspapers will be quoted on this interplay preceding 9-11. One of these reports was a May 27, 2002, “Time” magazine (p. 27) story on “How the U.S. Missed the Clues” by Michael Elliott.
In an incredible revelation, Elliott says that the CIA prepared a plan before September 11, 2001, to attack al Qaeda in Afghanistan with heavy support from the Northern Alliance (the Russian allies). Actually, as things worked out, this is precisely what happened (for some strange reason--as if the US-Afghan war was scripted in advance).
The word from “Time” magazine is that this plan for war was on the desk of the president on September 10, 2001, awaiting his return from his trip to Florida (where he was when the attacks took place).
It is inconceivable to this writer that the CIA would, on its own initiative and without some direction from the White House, arbitrarily make plans to attack the sovereign nation of Afghanistan. There is no way to approach this subject other than to automatically assume that the president had ordered this plan and the accompanying attack order to be prepared.
Accordingly, it was made--obviously much earlier than 9-11 (as will be shortly established below in later revelations).
Manifestly, the US White House (which is a puppet agency of America’s ruling plutocrats) began making plans to attack Afghanistan (along with Iraq) quite early in the GWB administration. The only thing needed to launch this attack was the cause or motivation which would unite the American public against the Taliban.
This very situation could have a close parallel to what the plotting and conniving Franklin Roosevelt faced in 1941 when he was doing everything possible to goad the Japanese into an attack so that America could enter WWII. Something had to occur to unify the American people and push them forward into war (which many Americans simply opposed in 1941).
Inevitably, one must pause and take note of the situation in America in August of 2001. Was there a similarity to the situation in America in 1941?
Moreover, there is the reality of the sinking of the battleship Maine in Havanna on Feb 15, 1898, and the Lusitania on May 7, 1915, in the Atlantic (both incidents are discussed elsewhere herein). These events were used by the war hawks to get the US into war with Spain and later WWI. Is it possible that the 9-11 incidents were scripted to precipitate the so-called war on terrorism and invasion of Afghanistan?
Later Revelations
More revelations were forthcoming in August 2002 which revealed that indeed the US government started making preparations to attack al Qaeda, evidently in Afghanistan, under the Clinton administration in 2000 (per the Aug 16, 2002, “The Week,” p. 5). The Clinton people decided that the plan should be deferred to the incoming Bush people in January 2001.
The GWB team conducted an eight months review of the plan and George W. Bush approved the plan on Sep 4, 2001. Evidently, the actual US secret attack order was prepared by the CIA and put on GWB’s desk before Sep 11, 2001, while the president was in Florida. Presumably, he was to approve it on his return to Washington (as actually happened).
Now, the So-called US-Bush War on Terrorism.
Anyway, the US War on Terrorism, as launched by George W. Bush in the fall of 2001, is another war involving months of planning and one which offered an opportunity to accomplish a whole series of objectives to benefit the ruling plutocrats and to help pave the way for the installation of world government.
These two goals are clearly involved in the sense that there are gigantic oil and natural gas deposits in the Caspian Sea area (to include much of Afghanistan). The Jun 3, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 18) had a story on “War for Profit: The Awful Truth” which said that there are possibly $35 billion in gas and oil reserves in just the Kazakhstan area (more than even in Saudi Arabia).
Fat cat oil company people have paid the Kazakhstan government some $3 billion to secure those rights and have invested some $35 billion in plant and equipment assets to recover those resources (ibid, p. 18). Surely, these investments could mean fantastic returns from later oil and gas sales in the hundreds of billions of dollars.
Too, there seems to be large deposits of uranium, gold, silver, lead, zinc and beryllium across Afghanistan, according to geologist and anthropologist Bonita Chamberlin (Dec 17, 2001, “American Free Press,” p. 2).
The previously discussed Enron Corporation (with former ties to almost all important American politicians, including Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, the Amalekite Chucky Schumer and on and on) has long had its eyes set upon Afghanistan and the huge oil and gas deposits in the Caspian Sea area (and still has, following the Enron bankruptcy).
The Feb 11, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 10) had a story by C. Parvin Foner on “Global Perfidy of Enron/Anderson Coming to Light” which noted the mineral deposits and Enron’s planning efforts to build a pipeline from Central Asia, across Afghanistan, and on to India, to move natural gas to markets in India. Whether this effort by Enron will proceed or not is still not clear (although some other firm may do it).
A report by Christopher Bollyn, on “Mainstream Media Avoids Questions of 9-11,” in the Jun 24, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 3), quoted investigative journalist Tom Flocco that Enron had 20 active CIA agents on its payroll before its demise. Apparently, the CIA and Enron were jointly working on global projects of some sort. Possibly, the situation in Afghanistan was one of those joint efforts.
The Jul 15, 2002, “American Free Press” (p. 10-11) had a follow-up on the CIA-Enron links in a related story by Tom Flocco on “Mounting Evidence of Larger Conspiracy Begs More Questions Regarding 9-11 Insider Trading.”